<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google takes on local TV staple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/07/25/local-tvs-loosening-grip-on-weather-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/07/25/local-tvs-loosening-grip-on-weather-traffic/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: discreet_chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/07/25/local-tvs-loosening-grip-on-weather-traffic/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>discreet_chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nowbreaking.com/?p=116#comment-221</guid>
		<description>PS) I just belatedly read the Reuters piece and I see that they mention Yahoo! and say that it doesn't yet do phones. I don't think any of these national services would hold a candle to a well-run local source like a TV station or a newspaper because the locals have local info and local tipsters, while the nationals are relying on "official" sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS) I just belatedly read the Reuters piece and I see that they mention Yahoo! and say that it doesn&#8217;t yet do phones. I don&#8217;t think any of these national services would hold a candle to a well-run local source like a TV station or a newspaper because the locals have local info and local tipsters, while the nationals are relying on &#8220;official&#8221; sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discreet_chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/07/25/local-tvs-loosening-grip-on-weather-traffic/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>discreet_chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nowbreaking.com/?p=116#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I'd be interested to see how Google's number of cities compares to Yahoo's, especially considering that Yahoo! has been doing traffic for maybe a year, so they have a big headstart. And, I don't really know whether you can get Yahoo's traffic on your phone, there's no reason for anyone to do traffic in my small town, so I've never looked.

Though, it was kind of neat to see that Google's added a "default location" feature, I guess if you'd like for them to do the obvious, you need to get the NYTimes and the blogosphere to make fun of them. And, I also guess congratulations should be in order because Google has obviously been expanding their image library. Finally, they have a picture of my house that rivals the quality of the one from Microsoft and both of them beat the drill-down depth of the satellite image licensed by the beta of Yahoo! Maps for my rural community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see how Google&#8217;s number of cities compares to Yahoo&#8217;s, especially considering that Yahoo! has been doing traffic for maybe a year, so they have a big headstart. And, I don&#8217;t really know whether you can get Yahoo&#8217;s traffic on your phone, there&#8217;s no reason for anyone to do traffic in my small town, so I&#8217;ve never looked.</p>
<p>Though, it was kind of neat to see that Google&#8217;s added a &#8220;default location&#8221; feature, I guess if you&#8217;d like for them to do the obvious, you need to get the NYTimes and the blogosphere to make fun of them. And, I also guess congratulations should be in order because Google has obviously been expanding their image library. Finally, they have a picture of my house that rivals the quality of the one from Microsoft and both of them beat the drill-down depth of the satellite image licensed by the beta of Yahoo! Maps for my rural community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/07/25/local-tvs-loosening-grip-on-weather-traffic/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 03:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nowbreaking.com/?p=116#comment-199</guid>
		<description>I was playing with this tonight on my Samsung A900 (Sprint) phone. Being somewhat over the age of 16, using the keypad to type a location is a little cumbersome for me, but otherwise it works very well. And no, it's definitely not something to use while driving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was playing with this tonight on my Samsung A900 (Sprint) phone. Being somewhat over the age of 16, using the keypad to type a location is a little cumbersome for me, but otherwise it works very well. And no, it&#8217;s definitely not something to use while driving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Bergman</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/07/25/local-tvs-loosening-grip-on-weather-traffic/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Bergman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nowbreaking.com/?p=116#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Haven't tried the new Verizon phones, but Google remembers your optimum view, so once you have it zoomed to the right location you just load the application up and it rather quickly displays the traffic conditions.

And it's all free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t tried the new Verizon phones, but Google remembers your optimum view, so once you have it zoomed to the right location you just load the application up and it rather quickly displays the traffic conditions.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s all free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/07/25/local-tvs-loosening-grip-on-weather-traffic/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nowbreaking.com/?p=116#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Is it easier to use than the interface on the new Verizon Navigator phones? I tried one out this weekend and wasn't too impressed. (I imagine I'd have an accident if using it while driving).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it easier to use than the interface on the new Verizon Navigator phones? I tried one out this weekend and wasn&#8217;t too impressed. (I imagine I&#8217;d have an accident if using it while driving).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
