<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study: Weather at risk for local TV sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1069505</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1069505</guid>
		<description>I have feared that TV weather and news would begin to phase out as websites become more available. This could be a bad thing to weather and news personalities. Many local areas are just now realizing the power of internet as some people are just now getting highspeed internet. I am a Meteorologist for a local station and also own a satellite business where we are converting people to high speed internet on a daily basis. Some of these customers are telling me that they would rather just go online to get weather and news versus turning on the TV set! I think for TV personalities, this could be trouble brewing. Lets face it, Less people tune into local news than used to. There are hundreds of other channels that can be watched! Someone may be watching HGTV or FOODNETWORK rather than the local news now days!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have feared that TV weather and news would begin to phase out as websites become more available. This could be a bad thing to weather and news personalities. Many local areas are just now realizing the power of internet as some people are just now getting highspeed internet. I am a Meteorologist for a local station and also own a satellite business where we are converting people to high speed internet on a daily basis. Some of these customers are telling me that they would rather just go online to get weather and news versus turning on the TV set! I think for TV personalities, this could be trouble brewing. Lets face it, Less people tune into local news than used to. There are hundreds of other channels that can be watched! Someone may be watching HGTV or FOODNETWORK rather than the local news now days!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOJO</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-698685</link>
		<dc:creator>MOJO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-698685</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks for the excellent information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks for the excellent information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is your meteorologist off the mark? - Lost Remote TV Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-333940</link>
		<dc:creator>Is your meteorologist off the mark? - Lost Remote TV Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-333940</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve written about this before, but I believe it&#8217;s critical that TV stations shift their thinking and spending from TV to the web when it comes to weather. Standard weather coverage on TV will no longer be a reason to watch (breaking weather coverage is a big exception), and people are shifting online in droves. So create powerful weather technology online that allows users to personalize their experience, and then extend that technology to TV. In other words, meteorogists on TV should be using your web-based technology to deliver the forecast, re-enforcing the need in viewers&#8217; minds to use your website for the weather. Under this approach, the web is the primary forecast destination, and TV is a complement. If we don&#8217;t make this switch soon, we&#8217;ll give away our franchise to Weather.com, the portals and national news sites. It&#8217;s already happening. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve written about this before, but I believe it&#8217;s critical that TV stations shift their thinking and spending from TV to the web when it comes to weather. Standard weather coverage on TV will no longer be a reason to watch (breaking weather coverage is a big exception), and people are shifting online in droves. So create powerful weather technology online that allows users to personalize their experience, and then extend that technology to TV. In other words, meteorogists on TV should be using your web-based technology to deliver the forecast, re-enforcing the need in viewers&#8217; minds to use your website for the weather. Under this approach, the web is the primary forecast destination, and TV is a complement. If we don&#8217;t make this switch soon, we&#8217;ll give away our franchise to Weather.com, the portals and national news sites. It&#8217;s already happening. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imparare</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-277299</link>
		<dc:creator>imparare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-277299</guid>
		<description>Interesting comments.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments.. <img src='http://www.lostremote.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Promote the web in weather promos - Lost Remote TV Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-166596</link>
		<dc:creator>Promote the web in weather promos - Lost Remote TV Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-166596</guid>
		<description>[...] Cory’s post a couple of days ago about why “search beats promotion” reminded me of an unintended behavior promos may be encouraging, particularly weather promos. I know weather promos are suppose to get me to watch the news, but for me at least, they simply remind me to check the weather online. Why wait for the 11 o’clock news, when I can grab my laptop off my coffee table? I can’t image I’m alone on this. If a growing portion of our audience starts doing this (maybe that’s why late news broadcasts are down 10%), shouldn’t we promote our online coverage, as well as our on-air coverage in every promo? If our promos are reminding people to go online, shouldn’t we at least remind them to go to our websites? Thoughts? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cory’s post a couple of days ago about why “search beats promotion” reminded me of an unintended behavior promos may be encouraging, particularly weather promos. I know weather promos are suppose to get me to watch the news, but for me at least, they simply remind me to check the weather online. Why wait for the 11 o’clock news, when I can grab my laptop off my coffee table? I can’t image I’m alone on this. If a growing portion of our audience starts doing this (maybe that’s why late news broadcasts are down 10%), shouldn’t we promote our online coverage, as well as our on-air coverage in every promo? If our promos are reminding people to go online, shouldn’t we at least remind them to go to our websites? Thoughts? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Urgency for Local Media - Lost Remote TV Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-127406</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Urgency for Local Media - Lost Remote TV Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-127406</guid>
		<description>[...] For example, one of the most popular features on a weather website is the zip code forecast. It’s been a staple of Weather.com, Yahoo and others for years. But on many local TV websites, zip code forecasts have been buried because they offer National Weather Service results that occasionally disagree with the one-size-fits-all forecast provided by the TV meteorologists. News directors have been worried that it sends mixed messages, when in reality the decision to downplay it reduces the station’s competitiveness online. A recent study found that just 26 percent of web users go to local TV websites for local weather. Almost all of the rest go to national sites, such as Weather.com and Yahoo, where they type in their zip code. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For example, one of the most popular features on a weather website is the zip code forecast. It’s been a staple of Weather.com, Yahoo and others for years. But on many local TV websites, zip code forecasts have been buried because they offer National Weather Service results that occasionally disagree with the one-size-fits-all forecast provided by the TV meteorologists. News directors have been worried that it sends mixed messages, when in reality the decision to downplay it reduces the station’s competitiveness online. A recent study found that just 26 percent of web users go to local TV websites for local weather. Almost all of the rest go to national sites, such as Weather.com and Yahoo, where they type in their zip code. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2155</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2155</guid>
		<description>My local NBC affiliate simulcasts its local feed of Weather Plus on its website.  The local CBS affiliate streams a web-only version of its forecast in Real and Windows Media format.  The local ABC streams its live dopper radar.
Me, I'm content with raw text from the NWS, but my first web browser was Lynx, so I'm weird that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My local NBC affiliate simulcasts its local feed of Weather Plus on its website.  The local CBS affiliate streams a web-only version of its forecast in Real and Windows Media format.  The local ABC streams its live dopper radar.<br />
Me, I&#8217;m content with raw text from the NWS, but my first web browser was Lynx, so I&#8217;m weird that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank padula</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2107</link>
		<dc:creator>frank padula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2107</guid>
		<description>How do you fight simple convenience? 

Easy one, "you create it".  I don't think i have seen one local stations wx site displayed in a clear fashion.  Always to much info that is watered down further by boring fcst discussion that i know i hate writting, etc.  We need graphics!  they are quick and dirty, to the point, and if people are creative enough they will draw you in.  I'm not taking about a temperature map clottered with text, but a graphic that illustrates the mood of the information and caters to its audience.  With the what am i getting out of this mentality.  The weather channel rocks, because they make it FUN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you fight simple convenience? </p>
<p>Easy one, &#8220;you create it&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t think i have seen one local stations wx site displayed in a clear fashion.  Always to much info that is watered down further by boring fcst discussion that i know i hate writting, etc.  We need graphics!  they are quick and dirty, to the point, and if people are creative enough they will draw you in.  I&#8217;m not taking about a temperature map clottered with text, but a graphic that illustrates the mood of the information and caters to its audience.  With the what am i getting out of this mentality.  The weather channel rocks, because they make it FUN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former TV Weather Person</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2062</link>
		<dc:creator>Former TV Weather Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2062</guid>
		<description>What almost every outlet does NOT do is go live online -- STREAMING -- how about using the weather talent to be in front of the green screen which would be shown, just like it is on tv, during times of any significant precipitation or weather event.

Why not have the weather talent use devoted weather watchers to chime in via voice, use Gmail chat or any other VoIP and have their voices piped in to reinforce what is going on in a locale?  And use these reports constantly, so there is something fresh every few minutes.  

ANd what is the purpose of stations which have spent tens of thousands on a radar unit to show it on a few lousy weathercasts?  Why not stream live a feed of that radar, quit wasting people's time by having the Java applets or whatever to load of a loop.

It seems harsh, but the news people seem to saturate coverage with items that have absolutely NO impact on local viewers.  Take for example the JonBenet Ramsey murder; it received the BREAKING NEWS label in markets thousands of miles from Boulder, Co.  Why?  Meanwhile, I'm guessing that scores of local markets had murders the same day as the Ramsey suspect's capture, but how many of these markets reported on these murders?  Some of them likely involved children.

Why not use Google Maps to display the crime committed in a community on a daily basis?  

And since Google is thrashing the ad revenue, why not take some of these newscasts out on the road to these area, say Shopping Malls and the like.  Have the sales departments work with these outlets to offer 5 to 15% off (or more) by coming out to kiosks at the malls.  Have some news talent on hand and have town hall meetings about specific issues within the mall.  If not malls, why not shopping plazas?

What I don't understand is that the market I reside in, four stations send a camera person to shoot the baseball game (a AAA team) for a couple of seconds of highlights.  There is hardly any post game interview or anything decent for a true sports fan to watch.  This is a good example of how GMs and NDs should contact each other and aggree to pool coverage for the highlights.   Or put the onus on the team to have some intern drive the highlights over (edited!).  It seems like a waste of time, resources, etc. for somebody to be sent over to shoot 2-3 hours of baseball for less than 20 seconds of a double, runner scores, pitcher strikes out someone, catcher jumps up and handshakes ensue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What almost every outlet does NOT do is go live online &#8212; STREAMING &#8212; how about using the weather talent to be in front of the green screen which would be shown, just like it is on tv, during times of any significant precipitation or weather event.</p>
<p>Why not have the weather talent use devoted weather watchers to chime in via voice, use Gmail chat or any other VoIP and have their voices piped in to reinforce what is going on in a locale?  And use these reports constantly, so there is something fresh every few minutes.  </p>
<p>ANd what is the purpose of stations which have spent tens of thousands on a radar unit to show it on a few lousy weathercasts?  Why not stream live a feed of that radar, quit wasting people&#8217;s time by having the Java applets or whatever to load of a loop.</p>
<p>It seems harsh, but the news people seem to saturate coverage with items that have absolutely NO impact on local viewers.  Take for example the JonBenet Ramsey murder; it received the BREAKING NEWS label in markets thousands of miles from Boulder, Co.  Why?  Meanwhile, I&#8217;m guessing that scores of local markets had murders the same day as the Ramsey suspect&#8217;s capture, but how many of these markets reported on these murders?  Some of them likely involved children.</p>
<p>Why not use Google Maps to display the crime committed in a community on a daily basis?  </p>
<p>And since Google is thrashing the ad revenue, why not take some of these newscasts out on the road to these area, say Shopping Malls and the like.  Have the sales departments work with these outlets to offer 5 to 15% off (or more) by coming out to kiosks at the malls.  Have some news talent on hand and have town hall meetings about specific issues within the mall.  If not malls, why not shopping plazas?</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is that the market I reside in, four stations send a camera person to shoot the baseball game (a AAA team) for a couple of seconds of highlights.  There is hardly any post game interview or anything decent for a true sports fan to watch.  This is a good example of how GMs and NDs should contact each other and aggree to pool coverage for the highlights.   Or put the onus on the team to have some intern drive the highlights over (edited!).  It seems like a waste of time, resources, etc. for somebody to be sent over to shoot 2-3 hours of baseball for less than 20 seconds of a double, runner scores, pitcher strikes out someone, catcher jumps up and handshakes ensue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2012</guid>
		<description>Even more than the Weather.com convenience factor is the fact weather is becoming ubiquitous: Google, Yahoo, RSS readers, DVRs and cable TV start screens, to name a few.

The keys to me would be:

1) Simplicity and cleanliness of presentation
2) Easy personalization (automatically remembers me)
3) Easy wireless delivery of personalized info
4) Weather storytelling and personality that brings local context and experience to conditions. 
5) Cool but easy-to-use technology that's mirrored from TV to online.  See it on TV, use it yourself online.
6) Emphasizing local expertise and proven track record in expanded promotion efforts, but don't use TV-like "TRIPLE DOPPLER 6000" promotion style.
7) Aggressive distribution of branded weather coverage to other information providers and platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even more than the Weather.com convenience factor is the fact weather is becoming ubiquitous: Google, Yahoo, RSS readers, DVRs and cable TV start screens, to name a few.</p>
<p>The keys to me would be:</p>
<p>1) Simplicity and cleanliness of presentation<br />
2) Easy personalization (automatically remembers me)<br />
3) Easy wireless delivery of personalized info<br />
4) Weather storytelling and personality that brings local context and experience to conditions.<br />
5) Cool but easy-to-use technology that&#8217;s mirrored from TV to online.  See it on TV, use it yourself online.<br />
6) Emphasizing local expertise and proven track record in expanded promotion efforts, but don&#8217;t use TV-like &#8220;TRIPLE DOPPLER 6000&#8243; promotion style.<br />
7) Aggressive distribution of branded weather coverage to other information providers and platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>Okay, I'll bite. What can be done?

I mean, lets face it. At this moment, if I say "Find me a weather forecast", even I, who runs a TV news Web site, will probably reflexively go to weather.com. It's quicker to type and flits to mind immediately.

That's despite the fact that, often, if I want any sort of drilled-down weather info, it's much faster to go to a local site than navigate the myriad menus at weather.com. And if I want decent radar, I sure shouldn't be going to weather.com.

Sure, they have a 10-day forecast. Know why we don't? Because the 10-day is wrong more often than right. So how do you show people that?

But in the end, it will _always_ be _easier_ to type weather.com than it will to type MyFoxNY.com, ABC13.com or anything with "channel" in the name. 

How do you fight simple convenience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll bite. What can be done?</p>
<p>I mean, lets face it. At this moment, if I say &#8220;Find me a weather forecast&#8221;, even I, who runs a TV news Web site, will probably reflexively go to weather.com. It&#8217;s quicker to type and flits to mind immediately.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s despite the fact that, often, if I want any sort of drilled-down weather info, it&#8217;s much faster to go to a local site than navigate the myriad menus at weather.com. And if I want decent radar, I sure shouldn&#8217;t be going to weather.com.</p>
<p>Sure, they have a 10-day forecast. Know why we don&#8217;t? Because the 10-day is wrong more often than right. So how do you show people that?</p>
<p>But in the end, it will _always_ be _easier_ to type weather.com than it will to type MyFoxNY.com, ABC13.com or anything with &#8220;channel&#8221; in the name. </p>
<p>How do you fight simple convenience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1997</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1997</guid>
		<description>SkyCams!  User controlled SkyCams will solve our problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SkyCams!  User controlled SkyCams will solve our problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedetroitchannel</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>thedetroitchannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>allocate some resources to a stronger door?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>allocate some resources to a stronger door?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Heaton</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Heaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>I've been writing about this for a long time, and the threat is very real. It's THE key niche for local broadcasters, and to give it away without a fight is pretty foolish. I'm sorry; a "useful weather app" on your site is important, but it doesn't address the real changes that are taking place in online news consumption. When you've got deep pocketed internet pure plays knocking at the local weather door, it's time for a little humility, resource commitment, and some creative thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been writing about this for a long time, and the threat is very real. It&#8217;s THE key niche for local broadcasters, and to give it away without a fight is pretty foolish. I&#8217;m sorry; a &#8220;useful weather app&#8221; on your site is important, but it doesn&#8217;t address the real changes that are taking place in online news consumption. When you&#8217;ve got deep pocketed internet pure plays knocking at the local weather door, it&#8217;s time for a little humility, resource commitment, and some creative thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/16/study-weather-at-risk-for-local-tv-sites/#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>Well yea, who wants to look at rehashed NWS text surrounded by flashy ads.

Now if you have some actual useful weather app on your site, that is a whole 'nother story - for example, while it hasn't been linked to on their site for years so you need to know the direct URL, KREM has a nifty java app that shows realtime current weather conditions outside for all over the area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yea, who wants to look at rehashed NWS text surrounded by flashy ads.</p>
<p>Now if you have some actual useful weather app on your site, that is a whole &#8216;nother story - for example, while it hasn&#8217;t been linked to on their site for years so you need to know the direct URL, KREM has a nifty java app that shows realtime current weather conditions outside for all over the area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
