<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbes.com and fuzzy web stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/28/forbescom-and-fuzzy-web-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/28/forbescom-and-fuzzy-web-stats/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MOJO</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/28/forbescom-and-fuzzy-web-stats/#comment-698655</link>
		<dc:creator>MOJO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/28/forbescom-and-fuzzy-web-stats/#comment-698655</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks for the excellent information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks for the excellent information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themanhattanchannel</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/28/forbescom-and-fuzzy-web-stats/#comment-3659</link>
		<dc:creator>themanhattanchannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/28/forbescom-and-fuzzy-web-stats/#comment-3659</guid>
		<description>coming soon to forbes.com: America's Drunkest Billionaire Heiresses...Topless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coming soon to forbes.com: America&#8217;s Drunkest Billionaire Heiresses&#8230;Topless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Heaton</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/28/forbescom-and-fuzzy-web-stats/#comment-3584</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Heaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/28/forbescom-and-fuzzy-web-stats/#comment-3584</guid>
		<description>Rafat had some good info on this in &lt;a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/the-story-behind-forbescoms-numbers" rel="nofollow"&gt;PaidContent today&lt;/a&gt;. Including this gem:

"...some competitors argue that Forbes.com’s popularity derives in part from racy, provocative or wealth-obsessed lifestyle features that have little to do with traditional business news — examples from this year include “The Hottest Billionaire Heiresses,” “Top Topless Beaches” and “America’s Drunkest Cities.” Also, competitors say that while eye-catching lifestyle stories may attract lots of readers, those readers are more transient and less likely to be the kind of high-powered professionals that advertisers pay more to reach."

If any of that sounds familiar, let's not be surprised by their numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rafat had some good info on this in <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/the-story-behind-forbescoms-numbers" rel="nofollow">PaidContent today</a>. Including this gem:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;some competitors argue that Forbes.com’s popularity derives in part from racy, provocative or wealth-obsessed lifestyle features that have little to do with traditional business news — examples from this year include “The Hottest Billionaire Heiresses,” “Top Topless Beaches” and “America’s Drunkest Cities.” Also, competitors say that while eye-catching lifestyle stories may attract lots of readers, those readers are more transient and less likely to be the kind of high-powered professionals that advertisers pay more to reach.&#8221;</p>
<p>If any of that sounds familiar, let&#8217;s not be surprised by their numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
