Comments on: McGraw-Hill’s KGTV training VJs http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/ Where TV Finds the Future Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:36:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: registered sex offender in virginia beach virginia http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-152881 registered sex offender in virginia beach virginia Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:56:02 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-152881 <strong>zoo fucks girls fucking zoo beast zoo fuck...</strong> nude pics of britteny spears... zoo fucks girls fucking zoo beast zoo fuck…

nude pics of britteny spears…

]]> By: men putting there penis in girls uterus http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-147454 men putting there penis in girls uterus Sun, 28 Jan 2007 02:26:38 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-147454 <strong>free teen images...</strong> porno and tits ad pusy... free teen images…

porno and tits ad pusy…

]]> By: Current Thinking » Blog Archive » Michael Rosenblum http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-26738 Current Thinking » Blog Archive » Michael Rosenblum Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:09:05 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-26738 [...] Rosenblum also trained a small contingent of staffers at San Diego’s ABC affiliate, KGTV. [...] [...] Rosenblum also trained a small contingent of staffers at San Diego’s ABC affiliate, KGTV. [...]

]]> By: ben theredunthat http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4779 ben theredunthat Sat, 02 Sep 2006 06:01:53 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4779 Rosenblum is a joke. He;s been pitching this thing since 1994 and it has done noting but fail in the United states. http://www.digitaljournalist.org/platypus/platypus3.html He's a great salesman though. Notice that he has saturated the tv message boards trying to create as much buzz as possible about this vj thing. He's trying to create the false impression that everyone is doing this when they are not. It's a lame attempt to make money and right now, he is just glad that the KGTV management has fallen for his scam. Rosenblum is a joke. He;s been pitching this thing since 1994 and it has done noting but fail in the United states.
http://www.digitaljournalist.org/platypus/platypus3.html
He’s a great salesman though. Notice that he has saturated the tv message boards trying to create as much buzz as possible about this vj thing. He’s trying to create the false impression that everyone is doing this when they are not. It’s a lame attempt to make money and right now, he is just glad that the KGTV management has fallen for his scam.

]]> By: Telling It Like It Is http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4462 Telling It Like It Is Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:19:53 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4462 McGraw-Hill's income for its TV stations is extremely low. Most of it comes from their financial companies and educational services. Keeping two mid-20 market stations and mid-120 market stations in dead last while saving a few bucks doesn't affect anyone's Christmas bonus in that company -- it just makes the television folks work harder. I've seen WRTV's newscast. I nearly hurt myself laughing. I can't imagine how much worse it's going to look when one person is expected to do the work of two. Gradual implementation or not, the system is destined for failure. No news assignment desk on the planet will send two people to a story if they've been trained as a VJ and have a remote possiblity of putting two stories on the air instead. Thusly, their spot-news coverage (among other stories) will always, always, always fail. Traditional crews will simply steamroll VJs over and over. Viewers in San Fran and Nashville have noticed, and not surprisingly, aren't attracted. You don't have to be in television to understand what that means. thedetroitchannel: work on your analogies. That "off the cliff" thing was pretty lame. McGraw-Hill’s income for its TV stations is extremely low. Most of it comes from their financial companies and educational services. Keeping two mid-20 market stations and mid-120 market stations in dead last while saving a few bucks doesn’t affect anyone’s Christmas bonus in that company — it just makes the television folks work harder.

I’ve seen WRTV’s newscast. I nearly hurt myself laughing. I can’t imagine how much worse it’s going to look when one person is expected to do the work of two.

Gradual implementation or not, the system is destined for failure. No news assignment desk on the planet will send two people to a story if they’ve been trained as a VJ and have a remote possiblity of putting two stories on the air instead. Thusly, their spot-news coverage (among other stories) will always, always, always fail. Traditional crews will simply steamroll VJs over and over.

Viewers in San Fran and Nashville have noticed, and not surprisingly, aren’t attracted. You don’t have to be in television to understand what that means.

thedetroitchannel: work on your analogies. That “off the cliff” thing was pretty lame.

]]> By: Allen http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4235 Allen Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:43:54 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4235 July ratings? Please. Maybe it didn't have a negative effect on the ratings, but did they improve? And you simply cannot tell me the quality of your newscasts has not gone down because it has in dramatic fashion. If counting beans is why you are in this business then I wish you much success. Granted, being in last place you have to pull out all of the stops in an effort to try to right the ship, but making drastic cuts is not the answer, imo. Then again, I don't get paid the big bucks like Rosenblum so what do I know? July ratings? Please. Maybe it didn’t have a negative effect on the ratings, but did they improve? And you simply cannot tell me the quality of your newscasts has not gone down because it has in dramatic fashion. If counting beans is why you are in this business then I wish you much success.

Granted, being in last place you have to pull out all of the stops in an effort to try to right the ship, but making drastic cuts is not the answer, imo. Then again, I don’t get paid the big bucks like Rosenblum so what do I know?

]]> By: Just a VJ http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4173 Just a VJ Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:09:42 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4173 I’ve always appreciated the fact these guys post the numbers everyday for all of us to see. Actually our morning numbers are up and we're giving WSMV a run for their money between 5 and 7am. Big story in the evenings is WTVF falling off dramatically and Channel 4 with Dr. Phil and Oprah doing very well. 10pm we're simply getting slaughtered and I think that's why the anchor change happened. I was very pessimistic about this switch and still have some doubts from time to time but it didn't have any negative effect on ratings. You wanta take shots go ahead but the ratings don't support your argument at all. Just saying. I’ve always appreciated the fact these guys post the numbers everyday for all of us to see. Actually our morning numbers are up and we’re giving WSMV a run for their money between 5 and 7am. Big story in the evenings is WTVF falling off dramatically and Channel 4 with Dr. Phil and Oprah doing very well. 10pm we’re simply getting slaughtered and I think that’s why the anchor change happened. I was very pessimistic about this switch and still have some doubts from time to time but it didn’t have any negative effect on ratings. You wanta take shots go ahead but the ratings don’t support your argument at all. Just saying.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4055 Anonymous Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:38:53 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4055 Mcgraw-Hill only acts like it cares about ratings. In truth, they'll gladly let their stations live in the cellar if it keeps their stockholders fat and happy in the penthouse. Mcgraw-Hill only acts like it cares about ratings. In truth, they’ll gladly let their stations live in the cellar if it keeps their stockholders fat and happy in the penthouse.

]]> By: thedetroitchannel http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4037 thedetroitchannel Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:44:14 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4037 boy, i love a good argument. mcgraw hill must be looking to have the cellar all to themselves, eh? boy, i love a good argument.

mcgraw hill must be looking to have the cellar all to themselves, eh?

]]> By: Allen http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4035 Allen Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:04:58 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4035 Correction: "dead" not "deal". Sorry. Correction: “dead” not “deal”. Sorry.

]]> By: Allen http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4034 Allen Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:04:23 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4034 Oh, it's "deal" alright. Dead last. Nobody is watching. The system is a ratings failure. If it were a horse it would have been put to sleep a long time ago. Oh, it’s “deal” alright. Dead last. Nobody is watching. The system is a ratings failure. If it were a horse it would have been put to sleep a long time ago.

]]> By: Z http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4033 Z Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:02:08 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4033 If by paying for two people they make three times as much as the guy paying one, yep, they'll stay the course until someone becomes number one using VJs. Then the bandwagon will become full. If by paying for two people they make three times as much as the guy paying one, yep, they’ll stay the course until someone becomes number one using VJs. Then the bandwagon will become full.

]]> By: thedetroitchannel http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4031 thedetroitchannel Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:41:09 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4031 yeah, they wouldn't want to get stuck on the tracks when the others go off the cliff from carrying all that dead weight. yeah, they wouldn’t want to get stuck on the tracks when the others go off the cliff from carrying all that dead weight.

]]> By: Allen http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4028 Allen Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:31:12 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4028 Of course the VJ backers will always point to the money side of the issue. The "Little Engine That Could" stations are still dead last in the markets (Nashville and San Fran) that went vj. Apparently they never left the train station. Of course the VJ backers will always point to the money side of the issue. The “Little Engine That Could” stations are still dead last in the markets (Nashville and San Fran) that went vj. Apparently they never left the train station.

]]> By: thedetroitchannel http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4015 thedetroitchannel Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:33:07 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/08/30/mcgraw-hills-kgtv-training-vjs/#comment-4015 it's also called twice the expense, tom. is the product so superior that the beancounters are willing to cough up twice the union scale to produce it??? me highly thinks not. i always liked the story of the little engine that could. i think it was #4 in a 3 locomotive market too. it’s also called twice the expense, tom.

is the product so superior that the beancounters are willing to cough up twice the union scale to produce it???

me highly thinks not.

i always liked the story of the little engine that could. i think it was #4 in a 3 locomotive market too.

]]>