Woman kills herself after Nancy Grace interview

Steve Safran September 13th, 2006

The mother of a missing two-year-old killed herself after a phone interview with CNN’s Nancy Grace. Melinda Duckett, 21, shot herself to death a day after the taped interview, just hours before it aired Sept. 8th. Writes the AP: Before it was over, Grace was pounding her desk and loudly demanding to know: “Where were you? Why aren’t you telling us where you were that day?” (CNN Transcript) Some members of Duckett’s family say the media pressure pushed her to take her own life. Police, however, while not calling her a suspect, have been focusing on her movements at the time of her son’s kidnapping. On her show Monday, Grace said “I do not feel that our show is to blame for what happened to Melinda Duckett. The truth… is not always nice or polite or easy to go down. Sometimes it`s harsh, and it hurts.” (CNN Transcript)

253 Comments Add your own

  • 1. El Dangeroso  |  September 13th, 2006 at 5:26 pm

    Nancy Grace has displaced Bears atop my personal Threatdown.

  • 2. 7odd  |  September 13th, 2006 at 5:59 pm

    Of course Nancy Grace would say that she doesn’t feel her show is to blame. Nancy doesn’t feel at all.

  • 3. BetterLateThenNever  |  September 13th, 2006 at 6:37 pm

    Time to vote! You were forced to spend an hour watching one of 2 programs. Nancy Grace or Jenny Jones. What do you choose?

    I’m voting Jones. I’m thinking Jenny would have had a more respectible interview with this woman and Elizabeth Smart.

    Maybe CNN should consider the Jones/Grace double feature? That’ll pull in the ratings. As long as Grace is employed by CNN, I’m going to avoid the channel like the plague.

  • 4. Alyssa  |  September 13th, 2006 at 6:54 pm

    it’s like the plot of a bad episode of L&O

  • 5. Dave  |  September 13th, 2006 at 8:40 pm

    Grace is as disturbing as the people who actually watch a show like that.

    Bleh… pure exploitation of people’s awful situations for profit. Then again, a lot of news is like that these days.

    Maybe that’s why people are going to the net in droves…

  • 6. Cory Bergman  |  September 13th, 2006 at 10:30 pm

    Dave, you’re right on. People are watching increasingly less TV news for the internet because there’s no screaming or “live local latebreaking” or stupid anchor chatter.

  • 7. Woman kills herself after&hellip  |  September 14th, 2006 at 12:47 am

    [...] Lost Remote TV Blog Woman kills herself after Nancy Grace interview [...]

  • 8. Jake Lin  |  September 14th, 2006 at 1:27 am

    I as an asian man am tired of our women being exploited as whores by europeans and you americans. It looks to me like she got what she had coming, she was a disgrace before the child went missing. She did what was the only honorable thing. My family and friends who were aware of the case are all pleased and happy a women with such little respect for her people would finally do the right thing. Whore.

  • 9. thomas  |  September 14th, 2006 at 5:50 am

    Hmm, interesting point of view there Jake, slightly barbaric, but then again whom am I to judge. (sarcasm).

  • 10. themanhattanchannel  |  September 14th, 2006 at 6:00 am

    if jake’s pov was the prevailing one here we’d have a lot of dead ceo’s on our hands.

  • 11. Alyssa  |  September 14th, 2006 at 6:27 am

    is someone attempting sarcasm?

  • 12. Terry Claypoole  |  September 14th, 2006 at 3:04 pm

    I have stopped watching Court TV, beause of Nancy Grace.She is a loud mouth pour excuse of a woman.She should be fired from both Court TV&CNN

  • 13. Andrews  |  September 14th, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    I’d like to know if her parents are proud of her now that she by all rights has killed a girl. Way to go CNN. Ha HA

  • 14. Michelle  |  September 14th, 2006 at 3:37 pm

    Can we hang her,or has she done that all by herself.

  • 15. Mst2bad  |  September 14th, 2006 at 4:27 pm

    I will never ever watch cnn again as long as that bitch works there, they should send her to iraq.

  • 16. Brian  |  September 14th, 2006 at 5:43 pm

    remind me to stay away from “you Asians’” no offence to any sane respectable Asian but there is something generally psychotic about a person that thinks suicide is the “respectable” thing to do and not the cowards way out, anyway back to the real subject. Nancy Grace is nothing but a raging bitch with a vendetta against absolutely everyone and everything, and her only fans are over-bearing, over-protective bitch mothers that are trying to raise a boy in a bubble. if she ran this country the only thing on TV would be her show and the god damn wiggles. I personally count the days untill she is off television forever, unfortunately I’m sure she will scream and shout her ridiculous opinions such as banning violent video games forever, I’m pretty sure if your kid thinks it is ok to kill a cop because he pushed a button on a game and did it you have some serious parenting problems. furthermore there are little things on the game called ratings, do your job as a parent and pay attention to them if you have a problem with it.

  • 17. jason  |  September 15th, 2006 at 6:06 am

    It’s about time people saw her for what she is seen for what is, an angry, miserable, big headed, control freak. This is the lady that if she doesn’t like what you have to say and she disagrees with you she turns off the mic the guest are talking into. To hell with up to the minute 24 hour news channel this are the down fall of America.

  • 18. Yvonne  |  September 15th, 2006 at 12:36 pm

    Nancy Grace how do you sleep at night knowing, you pressured this young women into killing herself.

    Do you have children goodbless your soul. How do you feel now Miss Almighty Grace.

  • 19. Cher  |  September 15th, 2006 at 2:48 pm

    You all have missed the point here. Nancy Grace was trying to be the voice of a poor innocent child. The rant was an obvious last ditch effort to try to force the mother to give any information that might lead to the location of this poor baby. Nobody can force someone to take their own life and, judging from the other information they have aired, it would have happened sooner or later. Maybe we need more people like Nancy to step and be the voice for these children who are unable to speak for themselves. And if any of you have children, Yvonne, I would hope that if you lost your mind like Melinda obvioulsy did, you would be lucky enough to have someone else step in to try to help your child. Melinda Duckett obviously didn’t care about her child if she was unwilling to cooperate with police and deserved the pressure from Nancy, the police and the world on behalf of that little boy. You all need to wake up and see who the true victim is here………Melinda’s son!

  • 20. Chris  |  September 15th, 2006 at 4:17 pm

    Nancy Grace should be fired. She is arrogant, haughty, and exemplifies all that is wrong in American media. I believe that she is directly responsible for this young girl’s suicide. Many Americans fear the media more than the authorities because the media has no checks and balances and no controlling authority.

    To all you insensitive bastards that think Nancy has no responsibility in this, I hope one day you find yourself in the sights of our unsympathetic media where your guilt or innocence is determined by self-appointed media-judges. Wait till you can’t show your face without everyone pointing a finger at you. Try going to a job interview after your face has been displayed on everyone’s TV and PC. Our media has the power to destroy people’s lives permanently. Even if a court finds you innocent, you will still be guilty in the public’s eye. Can you imagine the despair that this young girl felt when she realized that Nancy Grace was going to paint her as guilty in the eyes of the viewing public?

    Nancy Grace once compared all defense lawyers to Nazi guards at a concentration camp. When questioned about her comment at a later date, Nancy said, “Under no condition is a defense attorney equal to a Nazi guard. That’s just an extreme example of someone refusing to take responsibility.” So by her own logic, Nancy Grace is now comparable to a Nazi guard.

  • 21. poo poo pebbles  |  September 15th, 2006 at 4:29 pm

    Nancy Grace is a wonderful person caught on a terrible station.

    Are we so PC (Politically Correct for you morons), that if someone yells at you, you are responsible for their own destruction? Please give me a flippin break. Wake up and smell the coffee, life aint sugar and spice. There was some obvious guilt involved in her suicide. I have children, and guarantee you if they were missing and I had nothing to do with it - someone like Nancy Grace yelling at me, would not make me kill myself. Listening to you morons would though

  • 22. Steve Safran  |  September 15th, 2006 at 5:26 pm

    I have deleted some comments because of foul language and inappropriate content. (And yes, I recognize the irony.)

    There are obviously a lot of new posters here, and you’re welcome to share your thoughts. Please understand that Lost Remote is, first and foremost, a forum for the exchange of ideas. We only ask that you keep things constructive, uninsulting, and clean.

    Agree with us, disagree with us, think we’re nuts. Write it all. But write thoughtfully, as though you wanted to improve a problem and not add to it.

  • 23. BG  |  September 15th, 2006 at 7:28 pm

    I thought that in America you were innocent until proven guilty….I live in the Leesburg area and most everyone that I have heard speak of Melinda Duckett, seem to be sure that she is guilty …Well I remember the Gainesville murders and how they were sure that they had the right person{I believe his name was Chris} and all along they had evidence to prove it was Rollings{sp}somewhere at the police station{a tape}…So until it is proven that this young lady did this, I am giving her the benefit of the doubt. God rest her Soul. And as far as Nancy Grace goes, she has to answer for her own ways, and what she puts out she will get back, even though we the public may never know. I hope and pray that where ever or what ever that the Good Lord has this little boy in his hands.

  • 24. Sarah  |  September 15th, 2006 at 8:16 pm

    I believe that this girl, Melinda must of had a lot of guilt. In the first place why wouldn’t you want to help the police with the investigation, i’ts your son thats missing! Second, she had no job and her life was falling apart she must of been fighting a lot of her demons(she may have lost it ) who knows what she could’ve done. Lastly, she must of let those demons drown her in her own guilt.
    Oh and in responce of Nancy Grace, I think we need more people like her I don’t think this was any of her fault. In fact. she just helped the police find the real criminal in this story.

  • 25. Chris  |  September 16th, 2006 at 8:00 am

    I found the perfect word to describe Nancy Grace. She is a ghoul.

    Webster defigns a ghoul as:
    1 : a legendary evil being that robs graves and feeds on corpses
    2 : one suggestive of a ghoul; especially : one who shows morbid interest in things considered shocking or repulsive

  • 26. Chris  |  September 16th, 2006 at 8:45 am

    It makes me ill to read posts from supposed “mothers” who are sure that they would behave differently if their child was abducted. None of you have any idea how you would react in that situation until you are there. Such posts smack of ignorance and braggadocio. If she did do it, as you are already convinced she did, and she was disturbed, depressed, and suicidal, then wouldn’t that dictate a lighter sentence, or an insanity plea? So many mothers with so little compassion. Perhaps women aren’t the fairer sex after all.

  • 27. Safran  |  September 16th, 2006 at 10:24 am

    Chris: Excellent definition. Let’s go as her for Halloween.

  • 28. chu99g  |  September 16th, 2006 at 8:28 pm

    If what someone says to you or if the way someone makes you feel can push you to the point of suicide something is personally wrong with you. It’s no secret who Nancy Grace is or what she does. Given this FACT, why would she agree to even be interviewed by her. Speaking personally as a mother of 9, if just one of my kids went missing, I’d do any and everything possble to get him/her back home safely. If that means talking to Nancy Grace, so be it! I’m not saying that young lady is guilty or not guilty. My point is this: We all have our own minds, whether it functioning right or not, it’s our own and noone person can be blamed for someone’s decision to take their OWN life.

  • 29. Cher  |  September 16th, 2006 at 8:47 pm

    I’m assuming, Chris, that you were born with a penis or are a woman with no children, otherwise you would understand the bond that us “actual”, not “supposed”, mothers feel. You’re right, you will never know how you will react until you are in the situation, but seeing how panicked I have been when my dog is lost and I can guarantee you I would do anything possible to assist authorities in finding my child if she were to disappear. Unless you are a mother, you can’t understand the bond, so don’t attempt it as you are failing miserably.

    chu99g, I’m with you!

  • 30. Alyssa  |  September 17th, 2006 at 8:25 pm

    Steve- I don’t think that there’s enough eye makeup in the Northeast for more than one of us to dress up as Nancy Grace for Halloween. Or enough hairspray.

  • 31. Billi  |  September 18th, 2006 at 7:58 am

    I DO NOT think Nancy Grace had anything to do with Melinda committing suicide. Nancy Grace did not ask Melinda anything that all of us wanted to know the answer to, I am more than sure that the police asked the same exact questions. If what Melindas lawyer says is true that Melinda killed herself because she had heard that Trentons body was found in a dumpster, then maybe thats where she put her child. Also I would like to know when Melinda told her lawyer this (before or after). The main and only concern is to find Trenton, which we were never going to find out thru Melinda, she made sure she took it to the grave with her. NO MOTHER would have acted like her if their child was missing. Many people fail polygraph test and that does NOT make them a suspect. A perfect example is when that little girl was buried alive in florida by a neighbor, the childs grandmother failed the polygraph but that did not make her a suspect. A polygraph can not be used in court for that reason. However, when someone REFUSES to take a polygraph, it WILL raise a red flag. As for her being advised by her attorney NOT to take the test, what did Melinda do, ask her attorney before her child went missing, because at the time that her child went missing Melinda only had a divorce attorney, and she would have had NO reason to call him.

  • 32. Billi  |  September 18th, 2006 at 8:11 am

    To DEb pok, I hope you come across my post, it is obvious to me that Tampa and Michelle are the same. Notice the sudden change in behavior and remember the multiple personalities. Miss posting to you. This site looks real nice and “Steve” states he will remove all post with foul language, That will be really great….well take care….hope to hear soon….

  • 33. ~Julie~  |  September 21st, 2006 at 3:03 am

    I watched part of the interview and it really suprised me how Melinda seemed to have absolutley no emotion. I know people deal with stress in different ways but I’ve seen people show more emotion after losing their cellphone. Anyways I don’t believe Nancy caused Melinda to kill herself. She was just asking her questions and getting evasive answers, and if I was interviewing her not only would I find that irritating but I would be mystified as to why a woman whose young precious child was missing wasn’t being open with details that might just save her childs life. Screw privacy! The truth will come out soon enough.

  • 34. tommy z  |  September 21st, 2006 at 7:30 pm

    take a close look at nancy grace,shes a vulture.

  • 35. John  |  September 21st, 2006 at 9:15 pm

    Nancy Grace had absolutely no right to do what she did. Of course the mother was emotionally unstable and was supposed to have been having suicidal thoughts but that does not make her guilty. I am a graduate student working on my masters in criminal justice and by no means an expert but ms. Duckett was absolutely justified in not giving Grace the info she was so desperately trying to beat out of her, Nancy Grace is not law enforcement, prosecutor, FBI, or anyone else involved in the investigation of this case. She inserted herself into the role of interrogator and Ms. Duckett owed her absolutely no information whatsoever. I agree with most of the media. Ms. should have never even been allowed to do this interview because of the obvious sensative nature of the investigation and the fragile condition she was in. Responsible producers in the media would have said “you know, this girl is in no shape to do an interview of the kind that Nancy doles out so lets just pass on it until she regains some composure”. To bad Nancy will forsake all decency and morality for ratings and obviously the same goes for her crew and producers and CNN. I heard some one say that now not only does Nancy have her fiances murder to deal with but add another victim. I’m not saying she killed her but I bet not a day will go by for the rest of Nancy’s life that she does not think about and, believe it or not, feel guilty about this incident.

  • 36. Shelly  |  September 22nd, 2006 at 6:36 am

    Nancy Grace did not do anything more than ANY person would have done in trying to find a 2 year old. Melinda Duckett killed herself out of guilt and facing jail for lieing on her husband…….I guess, how we feel about Nancy Grace depends on what side of the bars we are talking from……..Nancy Grace is all for the victims and alot of you perps out there resent her for that…….Nancy can not step on anyones toes if your toe is not out there…….The very reason that you are using for not liking Nancy Grace, you are doing yourself. All you haters out there sound just like “Jackie Peterson” when she was trying to cover up her son murdering Lacy and Connor……..listen to yourselves……No different…..

  • 37. Shelly  |  September 22nd, 2006 at 7:00 am

    Also!!!!! These low down “defense attornies” are in the same category as their clients, they can even be worse because they are covering up for the slime. Westerfield was a perfect example, his lawyer knew his client was guilty of killing that child and still tried to convince the jury otherwise. I do not hear anyone downing these vultures. But you find time to down a woman “Nancy Grace” for trying to find a missing 2 year old that it is SO OBVIOUS that HIS OWN MOTHER is responsible for him missing……Find out where your priorities go before posting….I have not heard any one speak of the ONLY inocent one “TRENTON” . Your uncaring attitude is mixed with hate for Nancy Grace and you are letting that obsorb your better judgement. Nancy Grace asked all the questions that MOST of us wanted the answer to. NOT one question presented to Melinda Duckett was hard for her to answer “unless she was hiding something”. Children are ALL OUR CONCERN, whether they are ours or not. My impression of people like you are that if you seen a child being abused you would look the other way…..IF THE AUTHORITIES did their job right , than “Trenton” would NOT be missing right now……Melinda Duckett did what she felt she had to do when she knew she was caught up in her own web…..so stop putting the blame to a person who was and is trying to find a MISSING 2 year old and return him to his father where he belongs. Due to the coverage of the 11 day old kidnapped baby by Nancy Grace the baby was found alive, but of course you would not think about that, your hate for the woman overpowers your concern for the VICTIMS.

  • 38. Justin Simpson  |  September 22nd, 2006 at 9:56 am

    I personally think that our justice system, though sometimes failing, needs to be the one that handles justice. Not the press. What Nancy Grace did was use her “power” as a reporter to push someone over the edge. Even though it appears that Melinda Duckett could have been involved it still should be handled in a respectfull manner. Her agenda is the ratings and a paycheck.

  • 39. Stephanie  |  September 22nd, 2006 at 10:11 am

    Although Nancy wasnt in proper protocol…I believe that she knew that Duckett had to do something with her owns son’s disappance. If Duckett had nothing to do with her sons disappearance, then she would have been able to answer the question (s) with no problem at all…I am deeply saddend that it ended with a death and still a missing child…Rest In Peace Melinda Duckett

  • 40. Shelly  |  September 22nd, 2006 at 10:22 am

    Melinda Duckett was NOT under arrest when she agreed to be interviewed via phone by Nancy Grace. Diane Sawyer interviewed Scott Peterson in person and asked some pretty good questions, but nothing came of that. Melinda could have gotten off the phone at any time (which is what she did when she couldnt answer even one easy question like). Where did you go on the day Trenton went missing”? If it was me, I would have told them every step of the way, in hope that it would help find my child. Every media news caster does exactly the same thing, it is to be expected, and WHY would any mother evade every question asked. The media is your only friend at a time like this, you want your childs picture all over so viewers can help in the search. UNLESS OF COURSE YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE. We can not blame Nancy Grace for doing what they all do, because even if they annoy us and accuse us, they are STILL helping us and at a time like that a mother needs ALL the help she can get. There is no time to want to speak to your attorney, there should be no need to. So NO, I do not think Nancy Grace did anything wrong…

  • 41. allan  |  September 22nd, 2006 at 12:30 pm

    hey shelly you should apply for a job on court tv.

  • 42. Shelly  |  September 22nd, 2006 at 12:41 pm

    Allen: No thank you, I’m retired and loving it. Have all the time in the world to watch it though… And, No, I do not particulary like Nancy Grace, but I just don’t think she did anything wrong here. I’m sensible enough to not let my dislike for her judge her. There were many a times when I wanted to reach thru the screen and strangle her, but not with this case…… Nancy Grace asked ALL the questions I wanted to know the answers to…..I just hope and pray that she gave Trenton to someone and didn’t hurt him…The father seems to think that Melinda wouldn’t hurt him..I hope he’s right…Well nice chatting with you…

  • 43. John  |  September 22nd, 2006 at 8:13 pm

    Hay >>>>>>>>>>>>>Jake Lin I am going to go have SEX with all the Asian women i can now…. thank you. :)

  • 44. Shelly  |  September 25th, 2006 at 5:50 am

    Melinda Duckett left 2 notes before she took her own life.The notes might have moved the public, but after finding out that she composed and emailed herself a threatening letter indicating that her husband sent it in order to gain full custody of her son, I certainly do not believe a single word of it. That is how cunning Melinda Duckett was, and the system did not check into the authenticity of that threatening letter, if they had maybe Trentons dad would have had him that weekend and he would not be missing right now. I’m sorry, but I do not feel sorry for Melinda Duckett. She knew perfectly well that she had written that email to herself YET it was the first thing she showed to the police when Trenton came up missing, therefore she deliberately tried to put the suspicion to her husband when she knew good and well he did not take Trenton. THEREFORE that leaves the obvious, SHE DID IT AND TRIED TO COVER IT UP. THEN when she realized it wasn’t working and that the police knew the letter was a fraud (which she had just found this out) she ended her life rather than go to jail for the rest of her life…..That is why Melinda Duckett took her life….Not because of a 10 minute interview with Nancy Grace…..Melinda Duckett knew that once she was arrested she would not have a chance to kill herself so she had to do it before they came to arrest her……Everyone should get off Nancy Graces case about this….Nancy Grace does bad enough without this case……Trenton should be the only concern now, not a lieing cunning individual who took the cowards way out…

  • 45. Shelly  |  September 25th, 2006 at 6:32 am

    To the owner of this web, why dont you call it “SPEAK YOUR MIND ABOUT NANCY GRACE” because right now I feel like I’m posting to myself and thats no fun…..I enjoy other peoples opinion sometime. Thank You, Shelly

  • 46. Sal  |  September 27th, 2006 at 3:45 am

    If Nancy Grace screamed at me the way she did this girl, I would have told her to shove off. She’s already marked her guilty without any evidence to back it up. She’s a loud mouth wench, with a huge ego and irritating voice. I will not tune in to see her badger people to feeling guilty, while at the same time trying to look like some hero in the public’s eye.

  • 47. Shelly  |  September 27th, 2006 at 6:10 am

    Sal: You’re right, you would have told her to shove off, but you would NOT have killed yourself. For a 10 minute phone interview (which Melinda gave the phone to her grandmother in the midst of the conversation) that had not even been aired yet, I find a little hard to absorb that Nancy Grace caused Melinda Duckett to kill herself. Think for a moment: Melinda went thru a custody battle for which she committed fraud by sending herself an e-mail which allowed her to get a restraining order against her husband..Melinda went through hard times with her parents in the past…Melinda was going through a divorce….Melindas son comes up missing while she is entertaining friends in the next room….NONE of this made her kill herself…BUT TALKING TO NANCY GRACE OVER THE PHONE FOR 10 MINUTES DID? Does that even sound logical to you…Nancy Grace has alot of faults, she does not need this added to it for her to look any worse…..I do not and will not believe that Nancy Grace contributed in any way what so ever to Melinda Duckett taking her own life. Melinda had this whole thing planned for awhile, and she had already decided that if it didn’t turn out the way she wanted she would kill herself….I hate to talk about the dearly departed but Melinda Duckett was evil…she did not even have enough motherly feelings about her own son . Her hate for her husband was stronger then her love for her son…..that is EVIL…..Alot of people are saying she was just a kid..WRONG!!! Melinda was a married 21 year old with a 2 yr old son…the only KID was TRENTON…

  • 48. ERIN  |  September 27th, 2006 at 9:17 am

    I don’t think anything Nancy did or said was wrong. Anyone who agrees to do an interview with Nancy Grace knows of her aggresive personality. This is her job. If Melinda Duckett wanted someone to be sympathetic to her she should have done an interview with Oprah or Barbara Walters. Nancy is not to blame for her death, just the victim’s unstable mind.

  • 49. jarnigan  |  September 28th, 2006 at 3:25 am

    I don’t think Nancy Grace did or said anything that she should be sorry for. I watched the whole interview and I have to say that I would have been harder on her than Grace was. It was obvious that the girl was holding back information and for what, I thought that’s why she was on the show, to get her information out there to help in finding her son. I know more information has come out recently that further proves that the girl was a absolute nut job. I know many people who grab a shotgun, diaper bag, and there baby and go driving for eight hours through the forest looking for some target practice only to say that there baby vanished from the crib only hours later after there exciting day of being fucking insane. Give Grace a round of applause, she is one of the only ones that would ask questions like that, everyone else would have just set there and asked questions that have no significance. It’s hard to believe that people would have a problem with a reporter asking questions of a guest that willingly came on there show. Do you really think the girl didn’t see this coming. I have a new respect for Nancy Grace since this interview and the fact that she didn’t back peddle and try applogise for the questions she asked and stuck behind what she believed.

  • 50. Chrisstie30  |  September 28th, 2006 at 5:29 am

    When will the American people actually stand up and be accountable for their own actions? It’s quite apparent that Melinda had some serious mental issues and would have pulled the trigger no matter what, I appluade Nancy Grace for trying to get the truth out there.
    Yes, Dave…I’m apparently one of those…as you say “disturbing people” who watch her show. Let me ask you…are you out there trying to find out where the missing children are? People are so damn critical and judgmental!! I often wonder how the people who are so judgemental can lay their head down on their pillow at night and sleep??
    And to Chris who says “She is arrogant, haughty, and exemplifies all that is wrong in American media.” Let me ask….Do you walk on water?
    KEEP UP THE GREAT JOB Nancy Grace!!!

  • 51. Shelly  |  September 28th, 2006 at 12:14 pm

    I particularly enjoyed Nancy Grace show last night when she lit into TV GUIDE for their write up about her. TV Guide should be ashamed of themselves for taking time to write hate words about Nancy Grace instead of printing something that would help in the search for Trenton. This poor inocent child is God only knows where and the only thing that the Nancy haters can think about blameing her for Melindas death… I said it before and mean it, Nancy Grace had NOTHING to do with Melindas suicide. Melindas own evilness did that to herself, she was at the end of the rope that carried all her lies. I also understand that Melindas family refuses to cooperate with the authorities, Maybe one of them have Trenton…Melinda was gone for 8 hrs, she could have gone a long way and back with Trenton in 8 hrs. It is just so, so sad that the very one that a child looks to for protection (a mother) is the very one that some children have to be protected from. As Joshua said last night on Nancy Grace show, DCF should have never given Trenton back to Melinda after being removed 3 times. Someone was not doing their job and the poor child has to suffer for it. And to all you Nancy Haters, what side of the bars are you talking from? Nancy Grace is a “VICTIMS ADVOCATE” so I wouldn’t expect you haters to appreciate what she does for the victims…….

  • 52. Chrisstie30  |  September 28th, 2006 at 12:26 pm

    Nancy Grace is tough…that’s for sure! But, her passion is helping the victims and their families….if this is the way she earns her living..so be it, she’s damn good at what she does!

    For those who don’t like her…don’t watch her and keep your negative comments to yourself…oh, what a minute…this is America, we all have freedom of speech, right? So…Nancy Grace has a right to speak her mind…like I said before…if you don’t like it…turn the channel!

  • 53. Shelly  |  September 29th, 2006 at 7:56 am

    To Chrisstie: Well said………

  • 54. ERIN  |  September 29th, 2006 at 11:15 am

    I’m glad to see not everyone is oblivious to the fact that Melinda is a suspect and even though she is now deceased she still is. Melinda was not brought onto the show so we could all poor out our sympathy to her but mainly to get answers to the whereabouts of her missing son. Nancy is acting as a voice to this innocent child. And as others have said, “If you don’t like it turn the channel.” Instead of wasting your breath on it or printing an article about it use that air and ink for Trenton. You could be asking questions or printing his picture and the FBI’s contact info. instead of worrying about an interview and taking that attention away form Trenton. REMEMBER: we’re trying to find two year-old, TRENTON DUCKETT.

  • 55. Chrisstie30  |  September 29th, 2006 at 12:19 pm

    The problem with America today…
    EASILY OFFENDED PEOPLE! If we all focus on helping fix the problem, rather than B**CH about it, this world would be a better place!

    p.s. Thanks Shelly!

  • 56. Shelly  |  September 30th, 2006 at 8:43 am

    I agree fully, if all these Nancy haters would focus more on this innocent child instead of nit picking every word Nancy Grace says, they might be able to understand the purpose of the show (to find Trenton). As Chrisstie says “all you have to do is change the channel”. I do believe all those haters are products of Nancy’s prosecution days., and they have become obsessed with their hate. I DO NOT have time to hate like that, I might not agree with everything Nancy Grace says but I don’t agree with most of the other news casters. Nancy Grace is a “victims advocate” therefore she can come across NO other way….I like her show and watch it all the time. AND SO DO THE HATERS WATCH IT ALL THE TIME, thats how they can comment on her every word. My thoughts are on Trenton, and praying that he is OK. The more I hear about Melinda and the things she has done in the past, it worries me for Trentons safety. I’m hoping that she gave him to someone and whomever it is, doesn’t want to give him up, which is why they have not come forward yet, at least then he would be alive. Joshua seems to feel as though he is still alive, and I still hold that hope….But I think Nancy Grace is doing a great job in putting out Trentons pictures and keeping the story going. Melinda is no longer someone whom anyone should be concerned about, she took her own life which to me, showed little to no concern for her child. Melinda’s family are also not cooperating with the police in the search and that leads me to somewhat believe that they might know where Trenton is and do not want to let the poilce know. I did not and still do not believe Nancy Grace was responsible in any way for Melinda taking her own life, it was obvious she had planned that for some time. It is absurd to think that a 10 minute phone interview, that had not even aired yet, can cause a mother of a missing child to end her life. The people who believe that are the Nancy Grace haters, and only them, because no logical person would even entertain that thought.

  • 57. Sue  |  October 2nd, 2006 at 10:09 am

    It has been reported and confirmed that Melinda Duckett had been taking online forensic courses a short time before the disappearance of little baby Trenton. This by no means is any indication of guilt on the part of Melinda Duckett but I do find it quite curious. These were forensic science courses not just general criminal justice courses. She had never expressed an interest in forensics until shortly before Trenton went missing. She also did not tell friends or family that she was taking any online courses, especially in forensic science. I personally would find it a very interesting and exciting course of study and would tell people close to me about it. But She did not. Again, not an indication of her guilt, but unusual. I think it certainly begs the question, “what was her motivation in pursuing these online forensic courses?” Apparently, she was not an avid Court TV watcher or a fan of forensic shows either. That is clearly evidenced by the fact that she agreed to do a live interview with Nancy Grace. If she was genuinely interested in this particular area of study of criminal justice, I think she would have known all the big name players, like Nancy Grace and would have been familiar with Nancy’s “no holds barred” questioning technique and would have been better prepared for Nancy’s cross. I personally feel the only reason Melinda Duckett took those online forensic courses was for the purpose of covering up her intended acts of malfescence.

  • 58. Shelly  |  October 3rd, 2006 at 5:40 am

    Sue, I hadn’t thought of that but it sounds just about right. I still want to hold out hope that Trenton is still alive, but its getting harder and harder to keep that train of thought. Melinda was also diagnosed with being a compulsive liar and well as suffering with depression. I believe the compulsive liar part and she was good at it. I just hope and prey that they find Trenton no matter what so that the family can have closure. Trenton is such a beautiful child that came into this world never realizing what was in store for him…It is so VERY sad that he should have had to be protected from his OWN mother. Melinda had to have planned this whole thing which is what makes it so scary. Joshua tried his best to let the authorities know about Melinda, but they would not listen…Melindas family should have seen the signs as well, and should have tried to do something to prevent this tragedy. The way I see Melinda is, cunning, manipulative, liar, vicious and a person that would do anything to get her way and to hurt her husband. That e-mail she sent herself told ALL, and when she knew that the police was on to her she took the cowards way out. She didn’t even have enough heart and love for her child to let it be known where he was before she ended her life. For this reason, I can not find it in my heart to feel sorry for Melinda in anyway. In my opinion Nancy Grace, did NOT contribute to Melinda taking her own life, in any way at all. That was in the making long before her interview with Nancy Grace, if things did not go her way that was going to be her way out. Its also odd that in all 3 of her suicide notes, not once did she mention concern as to where her child was, it was all about Melinda.

  • 59. Leeanne  |  November 27th, 2006 at 9:53 am

    Nancy Grace is the only only media person who still talks about that poor girl in Aruba who went missing. She isa only doing this trying to get the justice these people deserve. Really where was this girl when her 2 year old went missing. I think she killed herself out of guilt. I am sure Naancy was not the only reporter/police/detective/family memebers/general public that was asking her the same questiion. They have still not found this poor little man. He was a little baby and she was his mother. I know that Jake guy may have sounded crazy but I do agree with one thing IF she is guilty then she did the honerable thing.

  • 60. Michelle from Madison  |  December 8th, 2006 at 8:04 pm

    On Friday Dec 8th, Nancy Grace was a guest on the Glen Beck show where she tried to come across as being “confident” regarding the Duckett lawsuit against her. But, Nancy only came across as someone in great fear of the likely upcoming outcome of that case. Sorry Nancy, don’t forget to bring your check-book with you to court. You are going to have to pay huge bucks on this case. Perhaps, Nancy, it may be cheaper for you just to not victimize the victims. It would also save lives if you did that Nancy.

  • 61. Michelle from Madison  |  December 9th, 2006 at 8:14 pm

    Curious as to why Billi posts comments in so many different names. (Billi, Alexis, Shelly, Shelley, Pycho-defender, Biliie, Bulli, and others. Wonder if that is to attempt to drum up some support to her illogical positions. Not sure, but just curious. If you search other sites, she/he does that all over the place. She/he did say she/he is currently being treated for some “mental deficiencies”, wonder what is up. Go ahead and vent out through whatever name you choose Biili. If you have the time, you may want to research the facts first before you continue to post illogical comments in your support of Nancy Grace the criminal. Good luck.

  • 62. Michelle from Madison  |  December 10th, 2006 at 4:10 am

    Ohh damn-it Leeanne (from Nov 27th @9:53am), I forgot to respond to you first, sorry. But, what poor girl in Aruba? Hope you are not insinuating NATALEE HOLLOWAY, because she is surely not some poor girl in Aruba, she was basically a “tramp” in Aruba. Not offense intended or implied. But, if you stay true to the reported facts of the case by the Aruban authorities, Natalee was confirmed to have had sex with no less than eight different males on her last known night on that island between a less than eight-hour period, and that number was just confirmed from the last several hours of her known where-abouts. Let alone all the other days Natalee was accounted for on all of the other nights on the island. Sounds like you need to read up on the facts first before you alleged Natalee was some “poor girl” on the island. Natalee was nothing more than a prostitute on Aruba, and she was treated as such. Read the facts! While I do feel bad she was not yet recovered, I still believe she is still alive and working off-shore making a bunch of money for sex, which she demonstrated in Aruba she was good for.

  • 63. Billi  |  December 11th, 2006 at 2:00 pm

    Is that you, Cross Dresser from Detroit? I post under what ever name I want. I still wear the same cloths for my own sex (which is FEMALE) lol..lol..lol..

    Now I know why you hate women so much, you want to be one. Well, sorrrrrrry, you will just have to keep dressing like one (that’s the closest you’ll get) Ha,Ha,Ha

    Oh, by the way Michelle from Madison is not from Detroit, HE is really from Madison New Jersey….
    That’s to throw you off….

    Do you wear High Heals too? Just curious…

  • 64. Michelle from Madison  |  December 11th, 2006 at 2:42 pm

    Billi, Alexis, Shelly, Shelley, Pycho-defender, Billie, Billy, or Bulli, or whatever name you are going by today, your cross-dressing tendencies are something you should keep within your own experiences and not flaunt out your undesirable tendencies out upon the net as you continue to do on this and other sites. Keep to the topic at-hand, Nancy Grace. While I do sympathize for the psychological difficulties you stated you are still in counseling for, I would suggest to you to talk about those issues with your Psychologists, your Psychiatrists, and your medical physicians, and not here on the Nancy Grace sites. Perhaps it might serve you well to print out all of your comments to show your doctors how you spend your time attacking others that still try to help you. I have a list of some sites of your attacks/rants that they can get from directly from me if they believe that could assist them. I know you mentioned before that you stopped taking your meds before, and perhaps that is part of the problem you are displaying currently. Dr. Michaels should be your first contact, and he can disseminate your problems to your other professional-contacts for you. Good luck.

  • 65. Michelle from Madison  |  December 12th, 2006 at 10:28 pm

    Listen Shelly, (Billi, Alexis, Shelley, Pycho-defender, Billie, Billy, or Bulli), or whatever name you are going by today, you should really first indicate to the readers of your posts that you have been “routinely” involuntarily been incarcerated at your Psych-Ward during your continued rants about defending Nancy Grace for the crimes Nancy continues to inflict against more non-convicted victims. You almost always have to proceed with a multitude of rants to justify your confirmed deficient-rant. Look back even on this site alone. You see? Is it beginning to make sense you to you Shelly, Billi, or what ever name you are going by right now today? Sounds like we need to forward this outburst-rant or yours to some of your doctors. On your behalf, I have forwarded your latest rants to your Dr. Michaels. Cost you six months of your freedom the last time you did that Billi/Shelly, remember? Stay on your meds this time, hopefully things will seem brighter to you soon.

  • 66. Billi  |  December 13th, 2006 at 10:12 am

    Oh Michelle, Mitch, cross dresser, lawyer, Nancy Grace wanna be, psychiatrist…whatever? Who cares? You are the most unimportant individual I have ever been in contact with. You are unable to hold anyones attention in your crusade against Nancy Grace.

    By the way, is Dr. Michaels one of your shrinks or a colleague of yours? Just curious. You seem to know alot about psyche wards. I thought you were only in the one in New Jersey? I must of mis-understood you.

    I received an E-mail from an old poster. You have to remember, “Respectfully yours from Madison New Jersey”. He was asking how you were progressing, if at all. I advised him that you were kicked off a few more sites and that you had been showing some improvement there for awhile but must have went off your MEDS again. He told me to send his regards and asked me to tell you, not to give up, that there is still hope for you..He also asked me if you were the one that Nancy Grace had arrested recently for stalking her, but I advised him that it could not have been you because you were still around., and that person was behind bars..

    What was it you said that you take again, “lithium” ? Is that for when you are cross dressed or when your back to being a man…Tell me, do they allow you to cross dress in that psyche ward where you are at? Is that part of your theropy? I hope they can make some progress with you hating women so much. That is really not healthy.

    Well Mitch/Michelle, hope you feel better soon. Try real hard this time and tell them to keep the female clothes away from you, that should help a little.

    I will out of town for the holidays but certainly looking forward to corresponding with you when I get back January 2nd………..

  • 67. Billi  |  December 13th, 2006 at 10:24 am

    One more thing before I leave, I heard the “law suit” against Nancy Grace was getting thrown out. I also heard that Joshua was going to take the advice of so many people that he heard from about him sueing Melinda’s family for leaving a “LOADED GUN” with her while they went out to eat, when they were fully aware that Melinda was suicidal..

    And one MORE thing…..HOW COME YOU DO NOT USE ONE OF YOUR SO CALLED “MANY COMPUTERS” TO GET BACK ON THE “NANCY GRACE SHOULD BE FIRED” SITE. I, MEAN, THEY ONLY BANNED ONE COMPUTER FROM YOUR SO MANY COMPUTERS. ONE WOULD THINK THAT YOU COULD VERY EASILY JUST SWITCH COMPUTERS……..

    OR COULD IT BE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE “ONE” COMPUTER IN THAT PSYCHE WARD?

    Bye, Bye, for now, you SICK CROSS DRESSER…………

  • 68. Michelle from Madison  |  December 13th, 2006 at 8:53 pm

    Listen Shelly, (Billi, Alexis, Shelley, Pycho-defender, Billie, Billy, or Bulli), or whatever name you are going by today, you should really discuss your current problems with your Dr. Michaels about your unfounded and illogical rants, and not continue to attack others that are simply still trying again to help you. I did file a formal-complaint about you with your IP-monitor regarding your rants (You are welcome). No damages are being sought at this period in time, however, the authorities have allowed for revisions based upon additional information obtained against your actions. Your continued rants contain indicators that your physicians will address for you, and not the posters on this site, or on any other sites. As you stated before on another site, your current “trip” until January 2nd is your continued in-patient stay. Good luck on that, and hopefully it will not be extended like it was earlier this year, and last year as well. Really, good luck this time. As you stated before, you have made some recent improvements, but consistency in your continued attendance is necessary and crucial of your own best chances of maintenance and rehabilitation. Good luck.

  • 69. Billi  |  December 14th, 2006 at 6:02 am

    Just checked in before catching my flight out of town for the holidays. I believe that is something YOU Mitch oh I’m sorry Michelle from Madison New Jersey is unable to do. Sorry you are stuck in that mental institution again for this holiday. Everyone was really wishing that would get a pass this year. I will inform all my E-mailers of the SAD news. But think of it this way…at least Nancy Grace can relax and have a great holiday knowing that you are locked away and wont show up at CNN stalking her..

    Tell me, when is it you hate Nancy Grace the most when you are dressed like a woman? Please discuss that with your psychiatrist…..I’m more than sure he can offer some help.

    I received 27 E-mails yesterday regarding you, that broke the record. Usually I only receive about 5 or 6. I don’t have time to discuss the details about all of them but basically they all said they were glad you would be off the streets, however they indicated some pity for you.

    Well I really have to leave now, but I will return on January 2nd, you can count on that.

    Make the best of the holidays, maybe next year you can go home if you behave yourself..

    TRY TO BREAK THAT ‘CROSS DRESSING’ THING {THAT MIGHT HELP}. ONE THING FOR SURE IT CAN’T HURT YOUR CONDITION….KEEP THE FAITH IN ANY CASE AND KNOW THAT THERE ARE A FEW (VERY FEW) BUT A FEW PEOPLE HOPING YOU MAKE IT OUT BY NEXT YEAR…(OF COURSE NG IS NOT ONE OF THEM)…AND NEITHER AM I.

  • 70. Joel F.  |  December 14th, 2006 at 8:11 am

    whats going on here, i sense a little misunderstanding among posters. has anyone heard anymore about baby Trenton? i can not find anything on the case i’m really curious. thank you

  • 71. Michelle from Madison  |  December 14th, 2006 at 10:08 am

    Sorry about the rants by Billi, there Joel, but Billi tends to do with when he is unser some personal pressure or trauma and he tends to attack other posters on many sites when Billi is out on leave from the center. She has another appointment over the holidays there and hopefully her physicians will address her issues then. Sometimes his rants are simply related to her missed medications and usually is a simple “fix” for him. Hope so. There are nineteen sites that I know of where Billi does these types of rants, but the number flexuates a bit. as far as Trenton, there is some speculation that he was “handed-off” to someone Melinda may have known before Melinda committed suicide within hours after she was verbally battered by Nancy Grace. The lawsuit will address the inapprpriate and unprofessional conduct of Nancy, and the criminal investigation is not yet closed either. The goal of the grandparents of Melinda is to keep Trenton away from Josh. Can’t wait for the case aginst Nancy on this lawsuit, appears like a slam-dunk case for the Plaintiffs.

  • 72. Michelle from Madison  |  December 14th, 2006 at 9:09 pm

    Nancy’s Thursday story was a better story for Nancy to cover. It was about the three missing hikers on the mountain. Yes, that approach may be a better way for Nancy to deal with stories because her interviews during an active police investigation like Melinda Duckett only results in the possible death to non-criminally charged individuals. Great damage-control, Nancy. Stay on those types of topics where you can actual serve a purpose, and not hurt anyone.

  • 73. Joel F.  |  December 15th, 2006 at 6:00 am

    i personally do not think Nancy Grace did anything wrong in her interview with Ms. Ducket. i feel as though that mother was guily in relations to her missing son. Nancy Grace was only doing her job and i saw nothig wrong in the questions the mother was asked. i saw the interview and unless all was not aired, i saw nothing that would have caused an innocent person not to have answered, especially if she was sincere in wanting to find her child. i believe she had a deep rooted problem that probably should have been addressed years ago before something like this could happen. The child had to suffer for this problem as well as the mother killing herself. this is a very sad situation. but what is going on now i have not heard any more about the case.

  • 74. New Yorker  |  December 15th, 2006 at 6:45 am

    No one put the gun to Melinda’s head but Melinda.
    End of conversation/////////////////////////////////////////////////////

  • 75. Michelle from Madison  |  December 15th, 2006 at 5:00 pm

    Nope, there New Yorker. Your assessment may be correct when you are speaking about an emotionally and psychologically-stabil individual, but not when you speak about the crimes Nancy Grace committed against Melinda Duckett. You need to consider both the elements of the Law, as well as the elements of Psychology (which the courts will do against NG/CNN) when you assess the actions Nancy committed against a psychologically-fragile young mother. To ignore those facts, is to not understand how Psychological-battering in the events of NG/CNN will be held accountable for. The good thing is that both Nancy Grace and CNN has not yet been engaged with any direct connection to the deaths of any more victims of Nancy Grace this past week.

  • 76. Giovanna  |  December 16th, 2006 at 1:22 pm

    I have a couple things and would love any thoughts….(I have never posted here, just stumbled upon it but looks like an interesting) well, first - quickly, Nancy did not do anything “wrong” with the interview and many people have said that. BUT — However my problem with her is airing the interview OVER AN OVER AND OVER and I think thats where the law suit really comes from. Imagine someone in your family died like this and for THREE months after you keep hearing CNN and Nancy playing this interview. You keep hearing your dead relatives voice on tv ! c’mon! Thats the kicker right there. No respect. Show the interview once or twice, or 20 times - got it, enough already!! Now she cannot say a word about it, due to the pending legal suit. Do you notice there has been no talk of it like anywhere on CNN?? (If you even watch that station.) Everyone has their opinions on this but I got a little annoyed to hear it being played 24/7 for ratings. That was cold and totally sensationalized. Bad choices.

    Now the “your thoughts part” - I know of people who have tried to help with this case by raising money for the father. I know for a fact people, friends have contacted Nancy personally months ago saying what was planned. No response. They contacted Josh, no response. They contacted Nancy again to say what they were doing, no response. And this city was not too far from Leesburg. I wonder why if she was so hot on this case, when people are trying to do something positive to help find Trenton, neither Nancy or Josh or anyone bothered to respond - ever! My friend is a professional yet very sad that not one word was received - not even a “good luck” or anything. Its been a while since the “fundraiser” and still not word from anyone after many attempts, isn’t that strange? Thoughts??

  • 77. Michelle from Madison  |  December 16th, 2006 at 8:14 pm

    The reason Nancy Grace aired the “interview” over and over and over was for one reason only: DAMAGE-CONTROL. Because both Nancy and CNN knew ahead of time the instability of Melinda Ducket who had a confirmed “psychologically-distraught” background. Nancy has made every comment, assertion, and speculation based totally upon the notion of damage-control because she knew her contact with Melinda Duckett resulted in violations of the Law. Hence, the justifications of the latest lawsuit against Nancy. If you read the actual Complaint filed against Nancy, CNN, and Josh, you will clearly see why the Plaintiff’s have a strong argument for the miscarriage of justice confirmed of Nancy which resulted in the death of a psychologically-fragile non-convicted mother of a missing child.

  • 78. Giovanna  |  December 17th, 2006 at 8:24 am

    Yes, I do know all that — anyone have any thoughts on my comment about last post? what do you think of no one- NO ONE responding to actions to raise money for Josh and all that. And, this goes back months, before a law suit was in motion, when it was her hot topic.

  • 79. Michelle from Madison  |  December 17th, 2006 at 9:55 am

    In the latest lawsuit against Nancy Grace right now, it is identified by the suit filed by the “estate” of Melinda Duckett that there is a request for accounting of all the money, if any, that was received in the aspirations of finding Trenton. Josh and Nancy Grace are going to have a lot of explaining to do on that issue. There are reports Josh has blown a great deal of money on items like a motorcycle, electronics, ect. I do expect CNN to attempt to settle this case monitarily before trial, but hopefully it doesn’t go that way. CNN often settles their lawsuits before trial since they were sued and lost over 25 million dollars by the Jenny Jones lawsuit about nine years ago or so for a case with many similarities to the latest misconduct of Nancy Grace and CNN. Some lawsuits wins won against Nancy have had some good results. Just this year alone, a court ordered Nancy to have at least one of her Psychologists “on-site” during any taping or live-airing of the Nancy Grace show. The Order also required counseling for some of her staff. Nancy better plan to bring her check-book with her to court this time. And, do not forget, the criminal investigation has not yet been closed either.

  • 80. Michelle from Madison  |  December 18th, 2006 at 9:36 pm

    SHOCKING NEWS from Nancy Grace from her show on Monday night, December 18th. Regarding the missing three climbers on Mt. Hood, Nancy questioned a guest regarding the two of three still missing, and said “Is there any legal liability to the two climbers that left ‘him behind?” There, mark my words, that too will be another upcoming lawsuit against Nancy Grace, and possibly CNN too. But, a another lawsuit against Nancy for sure. Nancy really better start to stop victimizing the victims. Simple as that. That will save Nancy and CNN probably millions of dollars in the upcoming latest lawsuits against Nancy Grace. Eventually, Nancy will have to be replaced with a person of some credibility, instead of CNN relying upon such a discredited “windbag” who does not understand the Law, or even has any compunction for victims of any crime. Because, Nancy has never been a victim of any crime, and Nancy has such a documented horrendous record as an attorney before the City of Atlanta removed her ability to ever practice Law anymore. Nancy better bring her check-book with her to court, she will have to pay out hugely!

  • 81. Giovanna  |  December 19th, 2006 at 7:14 pm

    Hi Michelle - you know ton, I am familiar with some suits but seems like there is more that I even thought. I did know all about having the psych. on set/staff etc. I dont even think the staff needs any help, its for her I bet. I wonder how long CNN will actually keep her…I mean, yes she has a “different personality” and attracts viewers - and the ratings are decent, not great but ok enough I guess. So they must not care how much they have to shell out for her “loose behavior.” I am very close to all the Atlanta history as well. Not good. I did not even think about the words with the recent hikers, you think something will happen with that?? Wow.
    What are your predictions?

    Also - Seems like in today’s world everything is about being famous and getting ratings no matter how bad you are (ie: Britney, Paris, miss SkankAmerica, etc.) Looks like Nancy Grace is riding the ratings, celeb train or whatever. She has changed greatly in the past couple years I’ll tell ya that…..

    I have not heard too much more about the money of Josh, etc. I told my friends group to NOT send any money and send it to an organization with more cred. Did he really buy a motorcycle, etc? That’s sick.

  • 82. New Yorker  |  December 22nd, 2006 at 5:56 am

    Michelle, not for anything but you sound like a nut. Whats up with this Nancy Grace thing you have? Do you know her personally or something? Where did you read that Joshua bought all these things, I would like to know because I know for a fact that it is not true. If it is published anywhere I will show it to Joshuas lawyer for an added counter law suit. So please let us posters know where you get your info from. Melinda off’d herself all by herself, the only aid she had was having a gun on hand, and might I add, supplied by her own grand parents.

  • 83. Michelle from Madison  |  December 24th, 2006 at 2:52 pm

    NY, no, I do not know Nancy disGrace personally, and I know of noone that has ever had any direct contact with her either. I simply stand up for the victims. The information I have seen about Josh’s actions and cinappropriate conduct is available on the internet. Gosh, I was really surprised to see just how many people believe Josh is, simply put, a piece of trash, but some have worded it much more severe. I did see that Josh has violated another Court-Order throughout this whole fiasco case. I believe the police should pick him up on that violation and hold him accountable for his violation. The police should also review if Josh should be held accountable as a co-conspirator in the death of Melinda Duckett that Nancy Grave initiated against Melinda. If you look on the Psychology sites, you will see violations that Nancy Grace and CNN committed against Melinda and will have to pay for in the lastest lawsuit filed. There are more suits against Nancy Grace still pending. (It is suspected that the Duke defendants will be the next the sue Nancy Grace, and then Joran Vandersloot through his attorney Joe Tacopina for the crimes Nancy documented against joran. The list of upcoming suits is too long to list here, sorry).

  • 84. Michelle from Madison  |  December 24th, 2006 at 3:47 pm

    Here is more info on the pathetic excuse of a father of Trenton. The article states “In the Duckett case, DCF documents obtained by the WESH 2 I-TEAM indicate that Melinda Duckett completed the DCF’s case plan, underwent court ordered psychological evaluations and passed them.
    Those same documents state Joshua Duckett didn’t complete the case plan, and on at least one occasion, violated a court order.” Here is one of the many links on Josh’s despicable conduct. But, the letters have a deliberate two-space gap in it so it would be allowed to be posted here. So, copy the site-name, remove the double-spaces, and then you will have the link needed to see some (there is a ton of info available) of the stuff available about this scumbag Josh.
    h t t p : / / w w w . w e s h . c o m / n e w s / 9 9 4 8 4 5 3 / d e t a i l . h t m l

  • 85. Michelle from Madison  |  December 26th, 2006 at 3:57 am

    Joe Scarborough’s show of MSNBC broadcasted another show that indicates that there is now a “suspect” (person-of-interest) in the Trenton Duckett case, and that the investigation is still on-going as of this date. The clip also confirms that “Nancy Grace is scared to death” about the Duckett lawsuit (and more lawsuits) coming against her and CNN for Nancy’s unprofessional and illegal conduct documented thus far in the Duckett case. If criminal charges come against Nancy, wonder if CNN will cover what Nancy gets served for dinner after she goes to prison? Hope the tickets are available soon for the upcoming trials against Nancy for her direct connection in the deaths of more people who were never criminally convicted including Melinda Duckett. Maybe Nancy will receive “chicken-on-bone” meal with a small cup of ice-cream.” If that is the case, maybe the public should conjure up a public-out-cry against Nancy for getting chicken and ice-cream in prison where she will likely also have access to a television too, but not to cable-television to watch Nancy’s replacement on her show. Ohhh, too bad Nancy. People have told you Nancy, you cannot continue to victimize the victims. Sounds like Nancy’s civil-illegal actions are finally catching up to Nancy, as it does with most criminals. h t t p : / / w w w . y o u t u b e . c o m / w a t c h ? v = l F - w 0 0 B f R S 0

  • 86. Michelle from Madison  |  January 1st, 2007 at 2:56 am

    Nancy Grace is charged with another violation of the Law. Does anyone else fimd that offensive?

  • 87. Giav.  |  January 4th, 2007 at 9:10 am

    testing

  • 88. Giav.  |  January 4th, 2007 at 9:17 am

    I have written a few posts recently and they never would go thru - anyone else have that problem?

    Anyway, cant remember all I wanted to say but first I DO kind of know Nancy Grace, just a bit, limited contact, she was never very responsive with me or my people - not impressed. (I don’t work in that arena any longer.) I could go on but won’t. Not worth it.

    I would like to know more about those suits, I see the general internet stuff and have not seen or heard much else. What other suits are there? CNN still stands by her but yes, eventually the tables may and should turn. I don’t wish her ill will but think her and her show have gone way down hill.

  • 89. Michelle from Madison  |  January 4th, 2007 at 7:13 pm

    Well G., Nancy Grace is on her THIRD different Damage-Control Specialist (firms) since Nancy violated the Civil Law against Melinda Duckett. Wonder why the first two DC Specialists quit trying to help Nancy. It would be interesting to find out the facts about that, and to see Nancy try to blame the DC Specialists for their quitting. Nancy would certainly not acknowledge it was Nancy’s fault. Maybe it might come out during her upcoming lawsuits, another is pending by Vandersloot through Joe Tacopina.

  • 90. Giav.  |  January 5th, 2007 at 9:13 am

    She will not admit anything is her fault, are you kidding? Never. I look forward to see how all these play out, Joe Tacopina is tough too. I do notice that 99% of the guests and analysts she used to have on are never on now, I have a feeling she may have made many people very angry, from some of the vic’s families, lawyers and so on.

  • 91. Michelle from Madison  |  January 5th, 2007 at 11:03 am

    I totally agree with you G.

  • 92. Bridget  |  January 5th, 2007 at 12:07 pm

    Nancy Grace is a straight shooter. I appreciate that. I love her show and I think she’s an extremely intellgient woman. I think the questions she asked tTrenton’s mother were justified. If she refused to answer these questions when asked by police I think she should have been locked up while they conducted their investigation, because her answer (or lack thereof) certainly made her appear guilty, even if she wasn’t. Unfortunately, I guess we will never know….

  • 93. Giav.  |  January 6th, 2007 at 7:15 am

    I don’t really think she was responsible fo the “death” BUT she is responsible for such poor taste in running the interview 2,000 times after. How would anyone feel to constantly hear their dead loved ones voice over an over and over 2 months later? Total bad taste for ratings only and I hear that is one of the main reasons she is being sued. She is a straight shooter, good qualities agree (to a point), I used to love her but she and the show have gone so down hill since it started. I have watched her since 2001 and see a huge difference in her from even early 05 til now. Plus knowing the personal aspect, I am NOT a fan any longer. I watch the show sometimes as I am for victims rights etc. but “her” no thanks. Not sure how long you have been watching but I see demise (sp?) Just my opinion.

  • 94. Michelle from Madison  |  January 6th, 2007 at 11:22 pm

    To not believe Nancy Grace has some culpability to the death of Melinda Duckett may be true if you are dealing with the facts pertaining to a psychologically-stabile individual. But, the facts are that both Nancy and CNN knew ahead of time of some of Melinda’s documented psychological instabilities, yet both NG/CNN still continued to pursue their approach in a manner more acceptable to individuals with a more “normal” psychological ‘state-of-mind‘. There in lies some of the problems Nancy and CNN are facing now in the Duckett lawsuit. As well as the other suits that are coming against Nancy and CNN according to the Scarborough interview just days ago.

  • 95. Giav.  |  January 8th, 2007 at 6:31 pm

    I hear ya. I want to know about those! Cant find any info. I flip on the show just to see how far down hill she is going and yep, its and she is going down hill big time. Everything about it & her. Tell me where there might be any info on other suits if you remember.

  • 96. Whit Whitworth  |  January 8th, 2007 at 11:47 pm

    Nancy Grace is dumber than a box of rocks. How anyone with her lack of intelligence ever got a law degree is beyond me. But then again, she was woprking in Georgia - probably don’t need to be very smart there.

    I worked for 29 years as a police officer and never encountered anyone in the law profession as dumb as she is, male or female. If they continue to keep her on television, they should move her show to Comedy Central, because it’s a joke !!!!

  • 97. Michelle from Madison  |  January 9th, 2007 at 2:33 pm

    Well said Whit!!!

  • 98. Giav.  |  January 13th, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    If Nancy Grace is SOOO for the victims how come today when the two boys were rescued (yesterday) #1-she didn’t do her show last night, there was a fill in who is way better than her & 2- every prosecutor in the world was making comments today on Fox and CNN about the press conferences etc. BUT NO NANCY. Unless she was in the Arctic Sea or there was a major death in the family, I cannot believe that she didn’t even call in. Greta V. and Kimberly and a ton more called in early in the morning on the shows, then appeared live later. But…no Nancy anywhere and she was soooo worried about the boy making a personal plea. Maybe she is not ALLOWED to make any comments (ie: Duckett case.) I think she is totally slipping and even if she is on live tonight, which I am not watching, too little to late. Someone like her should have been on it stat this morning. Guess she needs her weekends off. Big advocate…righhhhttt!

  • 99. Michelle from Madison  |  January 14th, 2007 at 3:22 pm

    Giav, Nancy Grace is suspected to be again “in-patient” at her psychiatric hospital at the time of that taping you mentioned. Since Nancy has several lawsuits pending against her according to reports on the internet, her “stability“ has been greatly affected. Nancy Grace “claims” to be for victims for ratings sake only, not for any real caring of any victims. Because Nancy was never a victim of a crime herself, she has no clue at all what true justice is. She has accomplished nothing for any victim, and Nancy only continues to disintegrate the criminal justice system by her sometimes illegal involvement in active police investigations by hindering the investigations and allowing alleged suspects to go free uncharged.

  • 100. Giovanna  |  January 16th, 2007 at 6:48 pm

    DId you see where Larry King dissed her in a Miami paper recently. Said basically he doesn’t like her interviewing style, etc. and was no too kind. I knew they no longer got along.

    So - what’s this about her in a psyche hospital!? Is that true, how do you know? I am totally surprised that she has been MIA since last week when all this news broke. I don’t get why she could not call in or show up for a bit with this huge news about the boys. Soledad on CNN was doing the show LIVE from the house this am, no Nancy anywhere. I dont get it, she would have to be locked up to not be on. I checked tonight quick and she is not on her show….somethings up!
    She claimed on Glenn Beck recently that she was totally fine, that NOTHING bothered her about all these suits. BS. You think she’s really in a “hospital”?!

  • 101. Giovanna  |  January 17th, 2007 at 5:53 am

    Missing kids my arse! Heard from the real deal that miss Nancy Grace has been on vacation and that is why she has not covered, called in or anything about the missing boys recovery. I was really trying to sort of stick up for her - give the benefit of the doubt, etc. But since over the months her show has gone in the toilet — and this missing kid story of the century (as I have heard it put) happens and –oh, she’s on a little vaca. Um, wasn’t the entire xmas hliday a vaca.? Nice how the rest of us go back to doing our jobs & miss justice for kids goes away for more r&r. I dont care if I were in the Baltic Sea, I would get to a phone and cover this amazing story. Her dedication is no longer, if so - she would have chimed in somehow - phone whatever….. So to all who stick up for poor nancy “working so hard,” put this in your pipe and smoke it & get real. I thought maybe somethign happened with her family, maybe she is ill. Nope, needs more vaca. If I had it planned a trip for two years, I’d get back and re-schedule, people with money can do that. Dedication my arse.

  • 102. Michelle from Madison  |  January 17th, 2007 at 8:33 pm

    Nancy “on vacation,?” Ha, ha, ha, ha, that is really funny. Nancy does come up with some real clever and stupid reasons to try to cover up her trail when she is in her CNN-mandated treatment facilities (one in Florida and the other in Texas). She does go into these places “in cognito” which was recently publicized through a Florida newspaper when Nancy was over in Florida making her mandated “rounds” in her continuing treatment plan. Ever since February of 2005, which also is substantiated on the article on the net, Nancy has been continuing her treatment plans and is often off the air as she continues her mandated treatment-regiment. Also, as of that date, Nancy can no longer do any broadcast on any television show for CNN where she is not accompanied by at least one of her mandated Psychologists, Psychiatrists, or Physicians per CNN. If you dig deep enough on Nancy, the information is obtainable. Still, that she is “on vacation” is just hilarious. Thanks G for the update.

  • 103. Michelle from Madison  |  January 18th, 2007 at 4:52 am

    Great to “see” you again Bill(i), glad you have been released again from your treatment facility. Hey, that is where Nancy is allegedly at right now. Guess you missed her shows and all of her fill-in-hosts recently. Her show definitely does much better when Nancy is away. As I have responded to the hundreds of direct-emails sent to me by those familiar with the Duckett case and the four pending lawsuits against Nancy Grace, it is clear to those informed to the facts that Nancy continues on her self-destructive path. Nancy is again suspected to be “in-patient” according to the information on the net about her recent re-admission into her hospital, as she is apparently feeling some stress due to the multi-suits against her right now and her dealing with the third of four Damage-Control firms that have abandoned her cause (her defense). Poor Nancy. But, perhaps if Nancy would stop victimizing the victims, she may find that she herself violates the Law much less often if she were to chose that preferable option. Good luck Nancy, stay on your meds, and stop inflicting emotional harm against non-convicted victims resulting in devastating consequences to non-convicted victims. And, good luck in your recovery too Bill. It is glad to see you released once again. Hopefully, you will have better luck this time around. Bill(i) has just been re-released again. So, if Bill(i) returns here to post her comments. (sometimes she uses other names). Please understand that she has undergone some traumatic psychological difficulties as of late, and she remains under constant mental-supervision to attempt to correct some of her difficult entities of her struggles. Let her “spout” and make unfounded claims, at least she is now mandated to be in an approved treatment program. We welcome her back. Good luck Bill(i). Better luck to you this time around.

  • 104. Billi  |  January 20th, 2007 at 3:29 pm

    The ONLY in patient around is “MICHELLE FROM MADISON NEW JERSEY” the CROSS DRESSER…

  • 105. Michelle from Madison  |  January 20th, 2007 at 8:20 pm

    Thanks, Billi, for confirming again that my previous posts were totally correct about you and Nancy Grace. Did you check out any of those University sites regarding your conduct pertaining to your recent documented (AAOP) actions-against-other-posters and diagnosis yet? They work off of your IP (Internet Provider) info available every time you use the internet. Hopefully your attorney would have advised you of that by now, it was pointed out to you by other posters trying to help you on some other sites already. It is not published information (AAOP), but is obtainable to some depending upon their degree of sophistication in the use of the internet. I have been provided with a tabulation-count-sigma (TCS) that has a floating-rate for you specifically, Billi, plus many of your known aliases. (Page 14-22.) The count as of January 18, 2007 at 10:32am is 91.38 percent disagree with your assertions you have made against others including myself, and 80,2 percent feel a need for more in-patient treatment for yourself by professional staff. That last percentage number also had an “Appendage” that indicates you (Billi) are “highly susceptible to being self-injurious” again without more professional treatment. Your SBI (study-base-information) has been forwarded onto more professionals in the fields to gain you more treatment options once you again are re-institutionalized, and the information has been logged into the CSSI (Computerized Suspected Self-Injurious) monitoring sites that you are undoubtedly familiar with by now. Their records go back more than a year and three months regarding your (Billi’s) latest “attacks” against others on different sites, and it also indicates a “high probability” of continued civil infractions “being performed by this suspect”. I was amazed they used that word (suspect) to describe you Billi. The municipality’s own word, not mine, look it up yourself. And, it is all verifiable, as you already know Bill. But, I do happen to agree with their findings posted as of that date about you Billi. Check them out. You may want to do that while you are in the presence of a competent and capable adult to assist you with explaining and defining some of the criteria and results. You are part of an on-going study, as you have been advised quite some time ago, the “Notification-Date (ND)” was something you had acknowledged on another site after you attacked many other posters there, per the sites written-rules-of-posting (WRP). That site also monitors complaints filed against you pertaining to violations of civil law, and generates a statistical data report to victims of your abuse, as you already know. I was surprised just how many people have already filed requests for actions against you. It is just nice to know you are being “monitored.” Best of luck to you, and hopefully you do not get locked up again in your pursuit of your “perceived-needed” rants. Good luck.

  • 106. Michelle from Madison  |  January 20th, 2007 at 9:34 pm

    Ohh yeah, Billi, it has been confirmed a poster on another site who reportedly also works in a position of Law enforcement, also had some verifications on why you claim everyone you oppose documented facts of, is because you do not either understand the true facts, or, you have not yet verified the facts against your current contentions. That report also suggests that you (Billi) were arrested during an incident back in November of 1999 where you (Billi) were arrested in the commission of a crime and it was discovered that you(Billi) were “crossed-dressed” at the time of your arrest. That report (#CC18910748-99) also indicates that you refused to acknowledge your real gender even after the results were done by the police physician. There is a record of that incident as well as referenced by the Complaint Number. You can obtain that document through the Freedom-of-Information-Act. Your whole psychological mannerisms and distortions, Billi, are slowly beginning to make some sense. Best of luck to you, and hopefully you do not get locked up again in your pursuit of your “perceived-needed” rants. Good luck.

  • 107. Michelle from Madison  |  January 21st, 2007 at 11:34 am

    Watched an awesome video where Nancy Grace is included in it. It states “what dopes injustice sound like?” and it shows a picture of Nancy Grace. The video also shows a picture of Nancy in front of an American flag. The picture looks accurate of Nancy, but Nancy should never be seen around any American flag because Nancy stands for everything that is not American. Cool clip, just click on the name by the number.

  • 108. Michelle from Madison  |  January 21st, 2007 at 12:31 pm

    Opps, a typo in my last post above. it was intended to read “what does injustice sounds like?”. Must have been an unintentional typo, but it is hard to isolate out the “dopes” from communications regarding Nancy Grace. She’s the biggest dope there is.

  • 109. Michelle from Madison  |  January 22nd, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Thanks again Billi, for proving all my prior points about you again. Don’t give up on Billi, there posters. I receive a ton of direct-emails each week about Billi suggesting options from having Billi re-committed into her psych-unit again, to suing Billi for her continued attacks against every poster that posts facts that Billi is unable or unwilling to understand or verify on her/his own. Well, people, that is one of the many reasons Billi lost custody of all of her children some years ago, and why Billi calls other people she feels inferior to nasty names or different names, and often says those people are cross-dressers and have been institutionalized, or are currently institutionalized like she is or has been. There is not a single psychological facility in the United States, contrary to Billi’s claim, that allows any of their patients to communicate unsupervised on the internet. Educated people know Billi is just exhibiting some of her documented schizophrenia-responses, and see her/him as nothing more than amusing entertainment. The latter info is found on the University-site under the POLLS option. She/he is definitely “Job-Security” for the mental health professionals. Good luck Billi, hope you can remain on the “outs” for a longer period of time this time, then what happened during the recent holidays. Again, try to focus on the topic of the site-page, and not on your attacks on everyone you feel so inferior to. Good luck.

  • 110. Michelle from Madison  |  January 24th, 2007 at 12:28 pm

    It now alledged that Trenton Duckett is now overseas. So who did Melinda Duckett kill before she committed suicide? Nancy Grace alleged Melinda killed someone before melinda committed suicide, but who?

  • 111. Michelle from Madison  |  January 24th, 2007 at 1:30 pm

    It now alledged that Trenton Duckett is now overseas. So who did Melinda Duckett kill? Nancy Grace alleged Melinda killed someone, but who? Sounds like Melinda Duckett handed off Trenton before she killed herself after being falsely accused of killing Trenton by Nancy Grace. Ouch, that is surely going to hurt Nancy Grace in her upcoming lawsuits. And, good for Melinda to save that child from that dispicable trash of a dad Josh.

  • 112. Michelle from Madison  |  January 25th, 2007 at 8:00 pm

    On the Nancy Grace show tonight on Thursday, Nancy finally covered some of the Trenton Duckett case where Nancy is alleged to have assisted and been connected to assisting in Trenton’s mother’s death. Nancy finally spoke about some of the information that Trenton is likely overseas right now, which I suspected from Day-One in many of my posts on the sites that cover some of Nancy’s illegal and unprofessional conduct. She sure is slow now-a-days getting to the up-to-date facts. That news is more than four months old already. I guess the stress she is experiencing facing the potential loss of millions of dollars is finally starting to get to her demeanor. It has already cause Nancy to fire her first two-of-three Damage-Control Specialist Firms, and has gotten her on an in-patient status three times since Nancy contributed to Melinda’s untimely death. Nancy had on Josh, that scum-bag sorry-excuse-of-a-father idiot and he just proved himself useless again on the show. Hopefully, Josh ends up with sanctions after the upcoming cases against him and Nancy get some true justice. Like MSNBC television has stated before, Nancy is scared to death right now. Good for Nancy. She should stop victimizing non-convicted victims. .

  • 113. Michelle from Madison  |  February 8th, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    Another victim of Nancy Grace’s unfounded slanderous allegations, and confirmed acts-of-criminal-defamation and erroneous speculation, dies today. Poor Anna Nichol Smith. What is the “magic number” of victims of Nancy’s ‘bashing’ will it take before Nancy is finally behind bars where she belongs for the crimes Nancy continues to inflict against non-convicted victims?

  • 114. Giav  |  February 11th, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    It will never happen, people like that have this crazy luck - she’ll never get what she deserves. Just doesnt work that way unfortunatley…..she’s like a cat with 9hundred lives. She was so rude to my people who were doing great work, needless to say none of them like her any longer. She is NOT what she preaches. Maybe years ago yes, now - she’s just a fake.

  • 115. photo girl asian cg&hellip  |  February 24th, 2007 at 5:02 pm

    yahoo groups sex…

    adult only beach vacations in texas…

  • 116. Michelle from Madison  |  March 1st, 2007 at 10:38 am

    Another lie from Nancy Grace verifiable on the net.
    Nancy Grace claims to be the father of Anna Nichol’s baby.
    Nancy Grace is now claiming to be the father of Anna Nicole’s baby.
    When will Nancy Grace stop lying? It is highly suspected that Nancy
    is simply just stating yet another lie, and her recent claim is
    probably not even close to being true, as much of what she states
    already proves incorrect. Perhaps, it may be time again for
    another “stay” in her Psych Ward. One of sound-mind might conclude
    that Nancy might be busy enough trying to generate up some type of a
    defense to some of her current lawsuits against Nancy to keep her busy
    enough to help eliminate Nancy from making such a fool of herself
    again. But, it does not appear Nancy is capable from not acting like
    a fool.

  • 117. Michelle from Madison  |  March 1st, 2007 at 2:23 pm

    Regarding the above story:

  • 118. Michelle from Madison  |  April 6th, 2007 at 8:47 pm

    On Thursday April 6th, Nancy Grace again complained why people are so “fascinated” with the topic of OJ Simpson. Part of the reason is directly due to people like Nancy Grace. Nancy is so consumed with all of her previous wrong “predictions” in the OJ murder case that she has been obsessed with her disparaging now-current position as a credible “journalist.” Nancy was wrong not only on that case, but wrong on most vases Nancy has ever attempted to cover over the years. Nancy has no credibility to anyone educated to the facts of the cases, and to those who have any professional experience in the fields of either Law or Psychology. Nancy truly is mere amusement to any viewer that is well educated. The problem remains, however, that uneducated and under-educated people tend to believe that Nancy Grace has any truth or substance to her rantings. There in-lies the continued problem with Nancy Grace, and why Nancy should stop victimizing victims.

  • 119. Michelle from Madison  |  April 11th, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    Nancy Grace was proven wrong again on Wednesday April 11th after the charges were all dropped against all of the Duke Lacrosse players. Nancy was wrong again on all assertions Nancy has made about this case, and she will be facing more lawsuits against herself for the crimes she committed against the non-convictism victims of this case too. Turns out that Howard Stern of the Anna Nichol case is also going to file another suit against Nancy for her crimes of character-assassinations Nancy did against Stern according to his attorney. Even the attorney of Joran VanderSloot of the Natalee Holloway case has mentioned filing another suit against Nancy as well for the crimes Nancy committed against Joran. Better bring your checkbook Nancy, you are going to have to pay hugely on your continued crimes against non-convicted victims. Perhaps it might be cheaper for Nancy to simply stop victimizing victims.

  • 120. Michelle from Madison  |  April 23rd, 2007 at 6:59 pm

    Nancy Grace was proven wrong again on all of her assertions on the Winkler case on Thursday April 19th. Doesn’t CNN management ever watch Nancy’s shows anymore?

    Nancy Grace has documented herself to be incorrect, in some fashion, on just about every single case Nancy has attempted to cover over the recent months. While Nancy continues to rack up more potential lawsuit cases against herself and CNN for her continued defamation, slander, libel, and even the wrongful death Nancy is currently linked to by Nancy’s own possible illegal actions, it is well documented that Nancy Grace is not un-willing to commit even more such crimes against even more and more victims.

    Some Courts have already reprimanded Nancy Grace for some of her documented misconduct. But, Nancy continues to rack up more and more violations of Civil Law, and possibly even Criminal Law too, and it is hard to keep up with the continued violations-count, and her seemingly constant violations Nancy has been committing against victim after victim after victim.

    The Lawsuits that are soon to be coming from VanderSloot, Howard Stern of the Anna Nichol Smith case, and others against Nancy infractions (according to the attorneys) and the upcoming Lawsuits from all the Duke defendants, as well as possibly from Winkler herself according to her attorney Ferese, Nancy’s continued law violations appear to be occurring on nearly every single day Nancy is on television.

    My goodness, Don Imus just lost his job for stating something that could, in-fact, may have been a factual and accurate statement by his derogatory statements towards the women’s basketball team. How CNN can allow Nancy to document even more violations against even more and more victims is just senseless and a total shame for CNN to just stand by and allow this irreprehensible behavior to continue against more and more victims from Nancy Grace. It is truly just ridiculous. Perhaps it is time to change from CNN to broadcasting Nancy Grace on something like comedy central where her conduct more appropriates is representative.

    Has CNN already forgotten that Nancy Grace has current lawsuits filed against her for Nancy’s role in the death of a non-convicted victim who Nancy Grace had called on the telephone? Wake up CNN, Imus had to apparently be removed from the airways, and he wasn’t even directly involved in connection of someone’s death. Nor was Imus continuing to victimize more victims as Nancy has documented that she is continuing.

    Maybe you, CNN, can provide the public with the “magic number” CNN feels is the appropriate-limit that Nancy has to achieve with her slanderous, libelous, her connections to a possible wrongful death actions Nancy has documented against another victim(s), and her defamational statements against victims before CNN will take similar actions as MSNBC had to do towards Don Imus.

    Everyone will be anxious to hear what the “magic number” CNN will tolerate as the group of victims of Nancy Grace grows and grows from her illegal, immoral, and illicit conduct towards so many victims.

    And, how can CNN allow a person like Nancy Grace to be around any true victim at Virginia Tech while Nancy has current lawsuits filed against her for Nancy’s alleged involvement in an early death of a emotionally distraught young mother. The management of CNN needs some serious investigation-measures to be implemented immediately, for the safety of current and potential future victims of the unprofessional conduct of Nancy Grace.

    How CNN can allow Nancy Grace to have any access to victims at Virginia Tech is a matter that should, perhaps, be investigated by the authorities and by attorneys for the potential victims of her unprofessional conduct. There is a reason Nancy Grace has lawsuits pending against her, with more lawsuits expected in the near future. For CNN to allow Nancy Grace to have contact with any victim is a crime in and of itself, and needs further consideration by the authorities and by attorneys for the victims sake and safety. Allowing Nancy Grace to have access to any victim is like placing a Predator
    near a schoolyard while the trial is ongoing for the alleged Predator. It should just not happen.

  • 121. Michelle from Madison  |  April 24th, 2007 at 4:26 am

    Nancy Grace was proven wrong again on Monday April 23rd from all of Nancy’s assertions that KENNETH GLENN HINSON was guilty of crimes including kidnappings, sex crimes, and assault with intent to kill two teen girls in an underground bunker located in Darlington, South Carolina last year. Remember Nancy’s unfounded rants?

    After Nancy Grace pummeled, ridiculed, slandered, and defamed Hinson on multiple shows aired by Nancy Grace/CNN, the court jurors acquitted Hinson today of above charges that Nancy Grace implied repeatedly Hinson was guilty of. Hinson was facing the possibility of a life sentence without parole, and Nancy had conveyed her apparent desire that a death sentence against Hinson may be more appropriate for Hinson.

    But, sorry Nancy Grace, one has to found guilty of those crimes before those measures can indeed be taken. Nancy, is wrong again. It appears that the only crime and miscarriage of justice committed in this matter was the coverage of the case by Nancy Grace. It is suspected that Nancy Grace will need more direct-counseling, more “damage-control measures”, and possible more medications for the stresses Nancy is experiencing being proven wrong over and over and nearly every single day Nancy Grace broadcasts a show through CNN.

    Get your checkbook ready Nancy, you are certainly going to be writing some big checks soon to help cover some of these upcoming lawsuits against you. Hinson’s defense attorney, Rick Hoefer, will likely soon sue Nancy Grace and CNN of even more civil crimes that Nancy Grace has documented against herself.

    The upcoming lawsuits against Nancy Grace, alleging Nancy committing crimes against a suicide victim and estate, against all the Duke Lacrosse defendants, and against victims like Joran VanderSloot of the Natalee Holloway case are just a few upcoming lawsuits that will be filed soon against Nancy Grace and CNN according to many defense attorneys and blogs.

    It is clear that CNN Management does not even bother to watch any of Nancy’s shows. If they did, they would never allow Nancy Grace to ever be around any victim of any crime. Nor would they allow her to commit more crimes against more victims as Nancy continues to document against herself. How CNN can allow this unprofessional misconduct by Nancy Grace to continue to occur is beyond all sensible and rational reasoning. To make some money-profits over the best interests of victims is not a choice most well-educated and caring people would choose.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18273283/

    and

    http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/player.jhtml?ml_video=85250&ml_collection=&ml_gateway=&ml_gateway_id=&ml_comedian=&ml_runtime=&ml_context=show&ml_origin_url=%2F&ml_playlist=&lnk=&is_large=true

  • 122. Michelle from Madison  |  May 10th, 2007 at 2:33 pm

    It is finally beginning to catch up to Nancy Grace. It appears that Nancy should not have continued to victimize so many victims, because CNN recently (March 2007) cut the number of hours Nancy Grace could participate on Court TV. But now, CNN is cutting Nancy Grace altogether on Court TV (May 2007). They are yanking the plug on her, finally.

    CNN is not yet “bashing” Nancy Grace for her documented misconduct and incompetence, but it will surely come eventually from CNN. Especially since CNN has so much misconduct and un-professionalism documented against Nancy Grace. I suspect that CNN is simply attempting to minimize their connection to Nancy before all of those upcoming lawsuits, filed and un-filed, come into the public domain.

    Most of the lawsuits discussed by attorneys of victims that are, or will be filed against Nancy Grace, involve aspects including defamation, slander, libel, harassment, Nancy’s direct role within hours of the suicide of an emotionally-fragile young mother of a missing child, the list is far too lengthy to list all violations here.

    It was a matter of time before things started to catch up to the “Gracester“. Criminals can usually hide for only so long. It is further evidence that Nancy Grace should not victimize victims, and her breaking civil laws at the expense of victims for some media ratings will cost Nancy Grace hugely.

    I suspect the court systems will need to find a huge courtroom to hold all the Plaintiff’s against Nancy Grace and CNN, possibly rent out the Astrodome. Most cases against Nancy are expected to be settled out-of-court, as most cases against Nancy Grace have been resolved for years already. It appears to be the “policy” of CNN to quickly settle cases that they know for sure they will lose; cost-effective.

    It will still cost the network big bucks. Let’s congratulate all the Plaintiffs for their efforts in assisting to remove such a negative and pathetic victimizer Nancy Grace. Keep up the good work for the sake of all victims.

  • 123. Michelle from Madison  |  May 16th, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    Every single guest on Nancy Grace’s show on Wednesday May 16th disagreed with Nancy on some point or another, and Nancy just had a “fit” tonight. That “emotional-meltdown” by Nancy may require additional treatment from her mandatory CNN-Psychologists since Nancy is stressed out by her pending lawsuits involving civil crimes Nancy committed which lead to the death recently of a non-convicted emotionally-distraught young mother of a missing child. It has become apparent why Nancy was recently first reduced from Court-TV last month before Court-TV finally kicked her butt off their show last week for good. Some of her guests on her show tonight even brought up how wrong Nancy Grace was about other cases like the run-a-way bride case, and why Nancy was incorrect of her demand that a lie-detector test is absolutely necessary for each and every case, and the results will determine the true guilt or innocence of any suspect as long as the lie-detector test is failed by the suspect. Nancy’s position of a suspect passing a lie-detector test is that the test must not have been preformed correctly, and every suspect would never be a suspect if they were not guilty of a crime. Well, it is clear why the city if Atlanta threw Nancy out on her butt years ago, and why they removed her ability to ever practice Law anymore anywhere within the 50 states of the United States. And, why Court-TV kicked her off their show too. Nancy Grace has no credibility to anyone who is educated to the facts of any case. Facts continue to be a big obstacle to Nancy, and it appears that the facts that indicate innocence to any suspect are a major cause of frustration to Nancy who wants every suspect sentenced to life without parole or executed for the sole reason of simply being a suspect.

  • 124. Michelle from Madison  |  June 9th, 2007 at 11:10 am

    Nancy Grace screwed up again on Friday June 8th when she attempted to cover the case of PARIS HILTON. Even several of the guests on her show disputed Nancy’s horrendous and unfounded comments and assertions made against Paris by Nancy. Hopefully. Paris’s attorney will view that episode of the show and will file yet another lawsuit against Predator Nancy Grace for the civil violations of the Law perpetrated by the Predator Nancy Grace. One might suspect that Nancy would have been more careful to not document harsh sentence expected to come again Nancy Grace. Too bad Nancy can not stop victimizing more victims, perhaps due to her documented even more civil violations of the Law by Nancy, especially considering the fact that Nancy Grace has several lawsuits currently pending against her with even more lawsuits coming from the attorneys of more victims of Nancy Grace. Nancy did say tonight “I did a bad thing.” So, maybe that should be viewed as a good thing for Nancy Grace admitting again that she truly is a bad thing and not an advocate for any victims. Perhaps at Nancy’s upcoming court cases her attorneys can use Nancy’s recent admissions that she is both “sick” (admission documented 06/08/07 by Nancy) and that she admitted that she has “done a bad thing” may help to alleviate some of the psychological instabilities. Poor, poor Nancy, no wonder the city of Atlanta threw Nancy out on her butt and removed her ability to ever practice Law anymore anywhere with any of the 50 states of the United States. And, why Court-TV just recently fired her butt. Get some more help Nancy, and at least try to stop victimizing more victims.

  • 125. Michelle from Madison  |  June 9th, 2007 at 11:11 am

    There is another “rumor” of another CNN-payout to stop another lawsuit against Nancy Grace, collected by the alleged victim of the more illegal slanderous and defamation-statements made against another victim by Nancy Grace on her Friday night show. The “rumor” issues are of that the Sheriff-person that was ultimately in charge of releasing Paris Hilton. That person ultimately may have, or may be, collecting some money for the documented illegal and defamation-statements made by Nancy Grace towards the Sheriff department. Nancy made many unfounded and false allegations against the department on her Friday show including civilly-illegal statements by Nancy stating that the department was “IN CONTEMPT”, which is contrary to facts and contrary to the Law. Sounds like Nancy should have just kept her big mouth shut and saved CNN another big bunch of money. But, CNN seems used to it, and will be paying out hugely soon once again to those current cases that will be coming soon to court against the Predator Nancy Grace. Gezzze, CNN could have contributed to a victim-help-fund instead of wasting more hundreds-of-thousands of dollars trying to pay off all the lawsuits and settlement cases involving the Predator-Grace. Seems simple to those informed to the actual facts of the crimes Nancy Grace continues to document against more and more victims.

  • 126. Michelle from Madison  |  July 3rd, 2007 at 7:10 pm

    It is now rumored on Tuesday July 3rd that Nancy Grace may actually have been fired, or perhaps suspended or sanctioned by CNN or something as Jane Valez-Mitchell is continuing to host the Nancy Grace show because Nancy has not hosted the show since sometime last month and only Jane has hosted the show all of July. If that is true Nancy was again suspended or finally and rightfully fired by CNN, Nancy should have known her lies would eventually catch up with her, and CNN