<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best and worst of Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 08:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: teen girls hot 18 gallerys</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-193005</link>
		<dc:creator>teen girls hot 18 gallerys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-193005</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;upper elementary stories...&lt;/strong&gt;

jon renau wigs erotic clothing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>upper elementary stories&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>jon renau wigs erotic clothing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flotsam</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-16248</link>
		<dc:creator>flotsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-16248</guid>
		<description>"Term of art?"  Heavens how we wrap what we want to defend in literary cloth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Term of art?&#8221;  Heavens how we wrap what we want to defend in literary cloth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Safran</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15810</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Safran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15810</guid>
		<description>Oh, the term is very silly and a little self-congratulatory. ("We're not like the first screwups - we're 2.0!") But adm and Warley are right - it's a term of art now and there is at least a vague understanding of what it means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, the term is very silly and a little self-congratulatory. (&#8221;We&#8217;re not like the first screwups - we&#8217;re 2.0!&#8221;) But adm and Warley are right - it&#8217;s a term of art now and there is at least a vague understanding of what it means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adm</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15735</link>
		<dc:creator>adm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15735</guid>
		<description>My favorite Web 2.0 site is Ning.com, which lets you easily create web-based applications, or instantly copy the ones other people have made. Ning really understands the social aspects of the web, as well as the revolutionary aspects of application cloning and streamlined development.

Although it is overused, I think the phrase "Web 2.0" still serves to make a useful distinction between what came before and what some of these newer sites are delivering. The essential features of Web 2.0 seem to be: a social network/framework, an API, and AJAX components in the interface that make the site feel more like an application and less like a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite Web 2.0 site is Ning.com, which lets you easily create web-based applications, or instantly copy the ones other people have made. Ning really understands the social aspects of the web, as well as the revolutionary aspects of application cloning and streamlined development.</p>
<p>Although it is overused, I think the phrase &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; still serves to make a useful distinction between what came before and what some of these newer sites are delivering. The essential features of Web 2.0 seem to be: a social network/framework, an API, and AJAX components in the interface that make the site feel more like an application and less like a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flotsam</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15710</link>
		<dc:creator>flotsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15710</guid>
		<description>so it''s default of safran then...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so it&#8217;&#8217;s default of safran then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Warley</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15678</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Warley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15678</guid>
		<description>flotsam I agree with you completely, but more often then not, I find myself defaulting to the term "web 2.0" and many other meaningless buzz words, so people can understand what I am talking about!  I also wish people would stop using MBA terms!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flotsam I agree with you completely, but more often then not, I find myself defaulting to the term &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; and many other meaningless buzz words, so people can understand what I am talking about!  I also wish people would stop using MBA terms!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flotsam</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15672</link>
		<dc:creator>flotsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15672</guid>
		<description>are we ever going to deep six "web 2.0?"  it's become a meaningless buzz phrase for anything new that anybody is doing and is mostly being used by those who missed web 1.0 and now want to sound on top of things.

come on safran, lead this charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are we ever going to deep six &#8220;web 2.0?&#8221;  it&#8217;s become a meaningless buzz phrase for anything new that anybody is doing and is mostly being used by those who missed web 1.0 and now want to sound on top of things.</p>
<p>come on safran, lead this charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safran</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15663</link>
		<dc:creator>Safran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15663</guid>
		<description>Google Calendar is an integral part of my life now. It exports to Outlook and Mac Mail, and sends me text reminders on my phone. It's my fave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Calendar is an integral part of my life now. It exports to Outlook and Mac Mail, and sends me text reminders on my phone. It&#8217;s my fave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15631</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/20/best-and-worst-of-web-20/#comment-15631</guid>
		<description>The collaborating / sharing idea is cool, especially for group work in college. 

Although, let's be real. MS will rip this off for the next installment of Word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The collaborating / sharing idea is cool, especially for group work in college. </p>
<p>Although, let&#8217;s be real. MS will rip this off for the next installment of Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
