<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: End this word: &#8216;Gubernatorial&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 507c1559065c</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-948032</link>
		<dc:creator>507c1559065c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-948032</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;507c1559065c...&lt;/strong&gt;

507c1559065c0abd1fbe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>507c1559065c&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>507c1559065c0abd1fbe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-698855</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-698855</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks for the excellent information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks for the excellent information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediaburn</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-23507</link>
		<dc:creator>mediaburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-23507</guid>
		<description>Contemporary english has its place, but an all-out ban?

It doesn't hurt for people to hear the one proper word that that sums the entire event up--at least once in a while--rather than having to rewrite entire sentences to sound "forced conversational..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contemporary english has its place, but an all-out ban?</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t hurt for people to hear the one proper word that that sums the entire event up&#8211;at least once in a while&#8211;rather than having to rewrite entire sentences to sound &#8220;forced conversational&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark SHepherd</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-23023</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark SHepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-23023</guid>
		<description>I believe it was Linda Ellerbee who once wrote "Even Gubernators" don't say "Gubernatorial."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it was Linda Ellerbee who once wrote &#8220;Even Gubernators&#8221; don&#8217;t say &#8220;Gubernatorial.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22866</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22866</guid>
		<description>too much weed in the 60's?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too much weed in the 60&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Catalano</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22602</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Catalano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 03:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22602</guid>
		<description>Um, like, that's how the kids have spoken since the 1970s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, like, that&#8217;s how the kids have spoken since the 1970s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Dangeroso</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22594</link>
		<dc:creator>El Dangeroso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22594</guid>
		<description>If we truly wrote conversationally, we'd use the word "like" every third word.

That's how the kids speak these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we truly wrote conversationally, we&#8217;d use the word &#8220;like&#8221; every third word.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how the kids speak these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22556</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22556</guid>
		<description>It's too close to Goobernatatorial - having to do with Gomer's cousin's swimming - so could cause confusion.  And these days, we know the voters are so easily confused - "Let's see... shall I vote for the Republicans who claim to have democratic ideas, or the Democrats who believe in republican ideals?" No wonder so many of them tend to just memorize one word "incumbent" and one phrase "vote against"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too close to Goobernatatorial - having to do with Gomer&#8217;s cousin&#8217;s swimming - so could cause confusion.  And these days, we know the voters are so easily confused - &#8220;Let&#8217;s see&#8230; shall I vote for the Republicans who claim to have democratic ideas, or the Democrats who believe in republican ideals?&#8221; No wonder so many of them tend to just memorize one word &#8220;incumbent&#8221; and one phrase &#8220;vote against&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Catalano</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22497</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Catalano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22497</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected. 

My Webster's Unabridged Second Edition (1948) also lists senatorial as a proper word, giving examples such as "senatorial duties" or "senatorial dignity." 

I should have checked first. (And I know this isn't simply because dictionaries are more descriptive than proscriptive of language these days.) My error; that's what I get for dashing off a comment before coffee.

However, I'm a huge fan of using a simpler word rather than more complex one if the simpler word will do in conversation. "Senate race" and "Governor's race" both have that conversational simplicity going for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected. </p>
<p>My Webster&#8217;s Unabridged Second Edition (1948) also lists senatorial as a proper word, giving examples such as &#8220;senatorial duties&#8221; or &#8220;senatorial dignity.&#8221; </p>
<p>I should have checked first. (And I know this isn&#8217;t simply because dictionaries are more descriptive than proscriptive of language these days.) My error; that&#8217;s what I get for dashing off a comment before coffee.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m a huge fan of using a simpler word rather than more complex one if the simpler word will do in conversation. &#8220;Senate race&#8221; and &#8220;Governor&#8217;s race&#8221; both have that conversational simplicity going for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thewashingtonchannel</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22477</link>
		<dc:creator>thewashingtonchannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22477</guid>
		<description>also, senatorial describes the occupation which many republican candidates will hold following this next election; a  janitorial position combined with the prestige of having been a senator in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, senatorial describes the occupation which many republican candidates will hold following this next election; a  janitorial position combined with the prestige of having been a senator in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22452</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22452</guid>
		<description>Not to get off the mark, because I happen to agree with Safran on this, but the American Heritage Dictionary says that not only is senatorial a word, but so is senatorially.  Doesn't mean you should write either one into your copy though.

American Heritage Dictionary 
sen·a·to·ri·al (sn-t�r-l, -tr-)  adj.

   1. Of, concerning, or befitting a senator or senate.
   2. Composed of senators.

sena·tori·al·ly adv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to get off the mark, because I happen to agree with Safran on this, but the American Heritage Dictionary says that not only is senatorial a word, but so is senatorially.  Doesn&#8217;t mean you should write either one into your copy though.</p>
<p>American Heritage Dictionary<br />
sen·a·to·ri·al (sn-t�r-l, -tr-)  adj.</p>
<p>   1. Of, concerning, or befitting a senator or senate.<br />
   2. Composed of senators.</p>
<p>sena·tori·al·ly adv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Catalano</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22376</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Catalano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22376</guid>
		<description>While we're at it, let's nuke a word that's frequently used in broadcasting that is not actually a word: Senatorial.

It's Senate.

As in "Senate race," not "Senatorial race." This is a textbook example of someone taking a real word ("Senator") and adding letters to it, forgetting that the word "Senate" is the right one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re at it, let&#8217;s nuke a word that&#8217;s frequently used in broadcasting that is not actually a word: Senatorial.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Senate.</p>
<p>As in &#8220;Senate race,&#8221; not &#8220;Senatorial race.&#8221; This is a textbook example of someone taking a real word (&#8221;Senator&#8221;) and adding letters to it, forgetting that the word &#8220;Senate&#8221; is the right one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safran</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22112</link>
		<dc:creator>Safran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 02:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22112</guid>
		<description>I don't see the problem with writing in "contemporary English." There's a tendency to romanticize the old - excuse me, "olde" - but language evolves. (Not that *anyone* ever used "gubernatorial.")

Language evolves, and thank goodness. We don't speak English the way that was considered proper at the start of the 20th century. And I'm sure the "thee" and "thou" speakers of the 17th century would be horrified by our use of the familiar "you" forms.

English has, depending on who you believe and how you count them, between 500,000 and a million words. That makes it, far and away, the language with the most words. Hardly one for dummies. And hardly one that will be "dumbed down" by subtracting a word from TV newswriting that nobody uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the problem with writing in &#8220;contemporary English.&#8221; There&#8217;s a tendency to romanticize the old - excuse me, &#8220;olde&#8221; - but language evolves. (Not that *anyone* ever used &#8220;gubernatorial.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Language evolves, and thank goodness. We don&#8217;t speak English the way that was considered proper at the start of the 20th century. And I&#8217;m sure the &#8220;thee&#8221; and &#8220;thou&#8221; speakers of the 17th century would be horrified by our use of the familiar &#8220;you&#8221; forms.</p>
<p>English has, depending on who you believe and how you count them, between 500,000 and a million words. That makes it, far and away, the language with the most words. Hardly one for dummies. And hardly one that will be &#8220;dumbed down&#8221; by subtracting a word from TV newswriting that nobody uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rooney</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22100</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 02:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22100</guid>
		<description>Amen, Steve!  I will go to whatever lengths needed to avoid using that word when I'm writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, Steve!  I will go to whatever lengths needed to avoid using that word when I&#8217;m writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22060</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/09/30/end-this-word-gubernatorial/#comment-22060</guid>
		<description>And let's not call it a Presidential race. Let's call it a President's race! :)

Sure, it may not be kosher with our very laid-back, contemporary english, but anybody who actually cares about who's running for governor will know *exactly* what Gubernatorial means. 

We don't need to dumb EVERYTHING down to MTV-level. There's still a role in our socialcultural climate for big words. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And let&#8217;s not call it a Presidential race. Let&#8217;s call it a President&#8217;s race! <img src='http://www.lostremote.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sure, it may not be kosher with our very laid-back, contemporary english, but anybody who actually cares about who&#8217;s running for governor will know *exactly* what Gubernatorial means. </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need to dumb EVERYTHING down to MTV-level. There&#8217;s still a role in our socialcultural climate for big words. ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
