<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV still first choice for news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/10/03/tv-still-first-choice-for-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/10/03/tv-still-first-choice-for-news/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: flotsam</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/10/03/tv-still-first-choice-for-news/#comment-23738</link>
		<dc:creator>flotsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/10/03/tv-still-first-choice-for-news/#comment-23738</guid>
		<description>Whoa. It is LOCAL tv news that is cited in that survey.  

What's that say for the network boys and the life of over-the-air broadcast news?

This is a BIG deal this observer would offer.

And the point about anything that begins RTN doing an 'objective' survery on news sources is, agreed, not a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa. It is LOCAL tv news that is cited in that survey.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s that say for the network boys and the life of over-the-air broadcast news?</p>
<p>This is a BIG deal this observer would offer.</p>
<p>And the point about anything that begins RTN doing an &#8216;objective&#8217; survery on news sources is, agreed, not a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
