diary of a young girl book scan…

scat queens belin…

riding pussy porn…

psp nude codes…

ryan phillippe nude gallery…

free xxx sex vidoes…

the fake celebrity porn pictures list…

Peter

The video quality is fine, but the interface sucks and it takes over my system.

Steve, you’re right on regarding Flash being a huge reason for YouTube’s success. I can’t believe the number of huge broadcast companies that settle for embedded Windows Media controls on their pages, when the UI looks nothing like the rest of the website.

Great design matters. Clean design matters. YouTube got the design and implementation right.

We’re not advocating lousy quality. We’re obsessed with quality. And we believe putting high-quality tools in people’s hands will result in a higher quality product than what we have now.

After all, all the HD cameras and TVs in the world do not equal fantastic, unparalleled enterainment. We have those now. Is news really so fantastic as a result?

It’s not the tools. it’s the craftsman. And sometime’s it’s not even the craftsman - it’s just the craft. The act of making something.

I appreciate the point you are making, but I respectfully suggest you are misinterpreting mine. Democratization of information does not mean $35,000 video cameras and Avid suites for everyone. It means there is room for everyone. High-quality production, medium quality - and lousy quality.

Do you suggest YouTube should have waited until a perfect HD codec was available and then only allowed people to upload HD video shot and edited on pro equipment? Of course not. Do I suggest YouTube replace all conventional television? Of course not.

But what traditional media has to understand is that there is room for all of this. Snobbery will not win this argument. Nothing communist about the best products winning. It’s just that there’s more than the video that made YT the best.

And believe me, I know stations that won’t play music off MP3 players because the audio isn’t “broadcast quality.” Take those same MP3s, put them on a CD, and audio will play them without thinking twice.

My favorite radio growing up was the crystal radio I make wrapping copper wire around a tube. The audio quality was, indeed, awful. But I made it. It was MINE. It’s not that it had an 8-inch subwoofer. It’s that I didn’t need to be Panasonic or pay them $99 to listen to the radio. That’s what this is about - ownership of the experience.

Still, I wish you luck. I simply disagree with your vision.

You can make flash look as good as you want during
encoding. But most people who use Flash, use it
because of the low bitrate possibilities.
And quality does matter in this world.
But with all our choices theses days,
we can now each choose our quality level.

You sound like the communists of old.
“More than one kind of bread? Why?”

It’s amazing to me how far you have all gone
toward the idea that quality of video and audio
and production doesn’t amount to a hill of beans
anymore. It’s the lowest common denominator rules.
Seems to me it means something to the millions of
folks who are shelling out real cash for HDTV sets
every day. But what do I know. Who cares right?
TV SETS? Are people just NUTS?
Who would want to watch something bigger than
3 inches by 4 inches anyway?
Not watch a TV show or Movie on a computer monitor?
Are you Crazy?

There is only one answer to everything and it is
crappy video. More is better with you.
Forget DVDHD.
Forget Stereo. Forget 8 inch woofers.
Who needs it. Music should sound like what I hear
over the phone, right?

I’m so very happy you guys aren’t responsible for
producing TV sets, HiFi gear, iPods, Macs, DVD
players, Washington State Cabs, Restaurants that
care about good food, Bartenders that strive to make
the perfect Martini. Producers and directors and
writers who work hard to create good stuff.

It’s just so sad the world you live in…..
the Microsoft world really, where “it’s good enough”.

Dan