TV station reported accurately, loses suit anyway

Steve Safran October 21st, 2006

A Kansas jury has ordered KSNW-TV of Wichita to pay $1.1 million in damages to a man it named as a suspect in the BTK murders. And nobody is disputing the station reported the truth. Some things worth noting: the plaintiff, Roger Valadez, had his house searched in connection with the killings. The station reported that. In fact, the jury even agreed the station was right in calling him a “suspect.” The jury took issue with the extent of the coverage and was especially struck by the station’s ND’s testimony that he hadn’t taken Valadez’s feelings into account when deciding to run Valadez’s name. (Valadez was cleared in the case.) The kinds of arguments we comfort ourselves with in our editorial meetings don’t always mean something to actual juries, gang. Read the story.

3 Comments Add your own

Leave a Comment

(Please keep URLs out of the comment body or the spam filter will block you.)

hidden

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Most Recent Stories

Retail stores face scanning revolution
Newspaper site rips TV news in promo
Print journalist blasts new KATV.com feature
Generation of local TV anchors signing off
HuffPo lands more funding, to expand local
Details of CNN Wire emerging