<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Networks may announce YouTube rival soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/18/networks-to-announce-youtube-rival-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/18/networks-to-announce-youtube-rival-soon/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: thedetroitchannel</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/18/networks-to-announce-youtube-rival-soon/#comment-102096</link>
		<dc:creator>thedetroitchannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/18/networks-to-announce-youtube-rival-soon/#comment-102096</guid>
		<description>agreed.

i was only pointing out the fact that their argument seemed to morph along with the success of youtube.

first was something like "who will watch homemade video?", next was something like "napster reincarnated", add your own at any time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed.</p>
<p>i was only pointing out the fact that their argument seemed to morph along with the success of youtube.</p>
<p>first was something like &#8220;who will watch homemade video?&#8221;, next was something like &#8220;napster reincarnated&#8221;, add your own at any time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/18/networks-to-announce-youtube-rival-soon/#comment-101973</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/18/networks-to-announce-youtube-rival-soon/#comment-101973</guid>
		<description>thedetroitchannel, they didn't have a business model that was completely clear but because someone is too conservative doesn't mean that they were wrong in their decision making.  Can the big "Networks" successfully make a clone of YT, yes they probably can.  Will it be successful, I don't think so because I doubt they have a vision to create something that will draw users away from YT, not that YT is all that visionary, they just got lucky and make a few bucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thedetroitchannel, they didn&#8217;t have a business model that was completely clear but because someone is too conservative doesn&#8217;t mean that they were wrong in their decision making.  Can the big &#8220;Networks&#8221; successfully make a clone of YT, yes they probably can.  Will it be successful, I don&#8217;t think so because I doubt they have a vision to create something that will draw users away from YT, not that YT is all that visionary, they just got lucky and make a few bucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedetroitchannel</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/18/networks-to-announce-youtube-rival-soon/#comment-100984</link>
		<dc:creator>thedetroitchannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/18/networks-to-announce-youtube-rival-soon/#comment-100984</guid>
		<description>another attempt at doing it on-the-cheap?

had they partnered prior to the goog deal they could have owned the original!!!

oh, that's right... THAT youtube had no business model.

sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another attempt at doing it on-the-cheap?</p>
<p>had they partnered prior to the goog deal they could have owned the original!!!</p>
<p>oh, that&#8217;s right&#8230; THAT youtube had no business model.</p>
<p>sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
