<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AgencyNext rebuts my criticism of its blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/agencynext-rebuts-my-criticism-of-its-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/agencynext-rebuts-my-criticism-of-its-blog/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/agencynext-rebuts-my-criticism-of-its-blog/#comment-698861</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/agencynext-rebuts-my-criticism-of-its-blog/#comment-698861</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks for the excellent information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks for the excellent information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discreet_chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/agencynext-rebuts-my-criticism-of-its-blog/#comment-102245</link>
		<dc:creator>discreet_chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/agencynext-rebuts-my-criticism-of-its-blog/#comment-102245</guid>
		<description>Uh - "obviously isn't" and not "isn't obviously", plus "Winter" not "Wnter"...
Oh, how I miss that old "preview post" feature, your old software offered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh - &#8220;obviously isn&#8217;t&#8221; and not &#8220;isn&#8217;t obviously&#8221;, plus &#8220;Winter&#8221; not &#8220;Wnter&#8221;&#8230;<br />
Oh, how I miss that old &#8220;preview post&#8221; feature, your old software offered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discreet_chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/agencynext-rebuts-my-criticism-of-its-blog/#comment-102239</link>
		<dc:creator>discreet_chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/agencynext-rebuts-my-criticism-of-its-blog/#comment-102239</guid>
		<description>You know that I really like LR and if I didn't say it enough, I'm sure you could tell from my number of comments, but I've sort of have to lump this thing in with the Walmart Parking Lot bandwagon; The "Wnter" blog obviously has a short shelf-life, if they don't run out of humor or reasons to post, the calendar will just get them. I mean, unless "Winter" starts smiting people or trying to extort money from parts of the country, it doesn't really have very far to go.

Perhaps the "blogroll" and the fact that the agency is identified as the one conducting the "interview" is pretty subtle, but the thing isn't obviously being written by a season and by using the third person, they're sort of covering their ass. It looks to me like an effort to get some links and maybe produce an agency buzz, something that's apparently working. Maybe they could go a little further with a copyright notice or something, but the consumer does sort of have to take some responsibility for themselves. After all, you can't really call it deliberately misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know that I really like LR and if I didn&#8217;t say it enough, I&#8217;m sure you could tell from my number of comments, but I&#8217;ve sort of have to lump this thing in with the Walmart Parking Lot bandwagon; The &#8220;Wnter&#8221; blog obviously has a short shelf-life, if they don&#8217;t run out of humor or reasons to post, the calendar will just get them. I mean, unless &#8220;Winter&#8221; starts smiting people or trying to extort money from parts of the country, it doesn&#8217;t really have very far to go.</p>
<p>Perhaps the &#8220;blogroll&#8221; and the fact that the agency is identified as the one conducting the &#8220;interview&#8221; is pretty subtle, but the thing isn&#8217;t obviously being written by a season and by using the third person, they&#8217;re sort of covering their ass. It looks to me like an effort to get some links and maybe produce an agency buzz, something that&#8217;s apparently working. Maybe they could go a little further with a copyright notice or something, but the consumer does sort of have to take some responsibility for themselves. After all, you can&#8217;t really call it deliberately misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
