Comments on: Networks’ answer to YouTube getting plug pulled? http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/20/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/ Where TV Finds the Future Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:14:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Liey http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/20/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-698822 Liey Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:20:39 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-698822 Wow, thanks for the excellent information! Wow, thanks for the excellent information!

]]> By: thedetroitchannel http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/20/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-103270 thedetroitchannel Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:34:56 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-103270 why take it back? he was seen wearing a tall top hat only a few weeks ago. so the corporate hat is a distinct possibility. why take it back?

he was seen wearing a tall top hat only a few weeks ago.

so the corporate hat is a distinct possibility.

]]> By: Dan http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/20/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-103209 Dan Wed, 20 Dec 2006 19:18:35 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-103209 I take it back, the corporate hat part, spirit of the holidays and all. Dan I take it back, the corporate hat part,
spirit of the holidays and all.

Dan

]]> By: Safran http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/20/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-102574 Safran Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:18:31 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-102574 I believe I may not have explained myself well enough if that's your takeaway. I wrote that they would have a very hard time pulling this off, and indeed that was so. There could have been a market for their content if they had done what we've espoused all along: opened their content wide, and given us all the ability to embed and share the way YouTube does. I don't disapprove of the nets getting together to do this - if they do it right. And I see no hidrance to creativity online. Creativity is boundless now. However it was clear that this was an unlikely venture. I've never been accused of wearing the corporate hat, though. New one for me. I believe I may not have explained myself well enough if that’s your takeaway. I wrote that they would have a very hard time pulling this off, and indeed that was so. There could have been a market for their content if they had done what we’ve espoused all along: opened their content wide, and given us all the ability to embed and share the way YouTube does.

I don’t disapprove of the nets getting together to do this - if they do it right. And I see no hidrance to creativity online. Creativity is boundless now. However it was clear that this was an unlikely venture.

I’ve never been accused of wearing the corporate hat, though. New one for me.

]]> By: Dan http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/20/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-102534 Dan Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:54:19 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-102534 Steve, you want these guys to get together? That is insane. Why is it good for even less creativity and even less risks between companies? I don't get your comments at all. This is clearly not good for anyone for there to be LESS voices. Take your corporate hat off dude. Think like a writer or producer or director for a second. You want all of us to have to go through ONE owner to get something out there? Dan Steve, you want these guys to get together?
That is insane. Why is it good for even less
creativity and even less risks between companies?
I don’t get your comments at all.
This is clearly not good for anyone for there to be LESS
voices. Take your corporate hat off dude.
Think like a writer or producer or director for a second.
You want all of us to have to go through ONE owner
to get something out there?

Dan

]]> By: Charlie Sierra http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/20/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-102520 Charlie Sierra Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:31:25 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/19/networks-answer-to-youtube-in-danger-of-getting-plug-pulled/#comment-102520 Two points: 1) The obsession with YouTube.com clearly highlights their real problem which is lack of attention or even respect for their audience, you know the customers. 2) WRT to your last question, the answer is never. Thats not how the business game is played. Very quickly: There are only 3 real strategies in business, 1) Innovation, 2) Immitation and 3) Frustration. Big companies can only manage 2 and 3, cuz a big company that could do 1, would close the door to the real innovators in this world, ie. entreprenuers, and that would suck. Its just one of God's little checks and balances thingies. tic. Two points:
1) The obsession with YouTube.com clearly highlights their real problem which is lack of attention or even respect for their audience, you know the customers.

2) WRT to your last question, the answer is never. Thats not how the business game is played.

Very quickly: There are only 3 real strategies in business, 1) Innovation, 2) Immitation and 3) Frustration. Big companies can only manage 2 and 3, cuz a big company that could do 1, would close the door to the real innovators in this world, ie. entreprenuers, and that would suck.

Its just one of God’s little checks and balances thingies. tic.

]]>