<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mediacom says Sinclair wants off its cable lineup - now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-159845</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 05:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-159845</guid>
		<description>so i just heard that because of this dispute, no one in eastern Iowa (Iowa City / Cedar Rpaids) will be able to view the Superbowl.

Is this true, is there another means aside from having directv to see it?

visiting the area from out of town, and very pissed i might not be able to see the game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so i just heard that because of this dispute, no one in eastern Iowa (Iowa City / Cedar Rpaids) will be able to view the Superbowl.</p>
<p>Is this true, is there another means aside from having directv to see it?</p>
<p>visiting the area from out of town, and very pissed i might not be able to see the game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-142754</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-142754</guid>
		<description>well the thing I can't understand is why Mediacom thinks Sinclair has a monoply - If I had the money I bring comcast  in my area an bankrupt Mediacom in a  couple of months</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well the thing I can&#8217;t understand is why Mediacom thinks Sinclair has a monoply - If I had the money I bring comcast  in my area an bankrupt Mediacom in a  couple of months</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristi</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-131428</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-131428</guid>
		<description>I'm not totally unsympathetic to MediaCom's situation.  However, it's FOX!!!  I could care less if MediaCom dropped 30 other channels.  And a big thanks to both MediaCom and Sinclair for doing this during the NFL playoffs.  I mean who would rather watch the Bears and the Saints when they could watch a 10-year-old Lindsay Lohan in a movie that was too crappy to make it in the theatres for more than a week?  Seriously, they take away FOX and replace it with Family Starz?  WTF?  I called MediaCom and they offered to send me an antenna.  Great solution.  The grainy resolution really adds the finishing touch to the sports watching experience.  My friends were so excited about it that it took them 30 seconds to decide to watch the game at somebody else's house.  So as great as the antenna idea is, here's my solution.  I'll watch the game at a friend's house (thank you DirectTV), steal the shows on Fox that I'd want to watch (thank you internet), and I'll drop MediaCom (thank you antenna!).  Both Sinclair and MediaCom can go the Hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not totally unsympathetic to MediaCom&#8217;s situation.  However, it&#8217;s FOX!!!  I could care less if MediaCom dropped 30 other channels.  And a big thanks to both MediaCom and Sinclair for doing this during the NFL playoffs.  I mean who would rather watch the Bears and the Saints when they could watch a 10-year-old Lindsay Lohan in a movie that was too crappy to make it in the theatres for more than a week?  Seriously, they take away FOX and replace it with Family Starz?  WTF?  I called MediaCom and they offered to send me an antenna.  Great solution.  The grainy resolution really adds the finishing touch to the sports watching experience.  My friends were so excited about it that it took them 30 seconds to decide to watch the game at somebody else&#8217;s house.  So as great as the antenna idea is, here&#8217;s my solution.  I&#8217;ll watch the game at a friend&#8217;s house (thank you DirectTV), steal the shows on Fox that I&#8217;d want to watch (thank you internet), and I&#8217;ll drop MediaCom (thank you antenna!).  Both Sinclair and MediaCom can go the Hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-128198</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-128198</guid>
		<description>I can see how each side wants what they want, but Sinclair should be happy to get ANYTHING from the cable companies. Considering Sinclair stations make the bulk of their money off of advertising on shows that are syndicated or network, they are not hurting so far as to demand so much from the cable companies.

Cable MSO's are used to shelling out 25-30 cents per subscriber for TLC, TBS, Comedy Central. But paying terrestrial channels for the right to rebroadcast is new. CBS is just starting to get into the mix. Back in the early 90's, "must carry" was the rule and cable balked at that (loss of channel space).

Despite what you think, cable companies really do want to keep your rates low. They can't do that when every network on every channel is demanding payment. Dish and DirecTV are no different. It is not fair that Mediacom had to drop Sinclair's stations because one side won't budge and the other is being as flexible as possible. I applaud Mediacom for holding their ground and doing what they could to keep the stations on the lineup. They are still trying. I just wish Sinclair would realize that they are only hurting themselves by reducing the number of eyeballs they are reaching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how each side wants what they want, but Sinclair should be happy to get ANYTHING from the cable companies. Considering Sinclair stations make the bulk of their money off of advertising on shows that are syndicated or network, they are not hurting so far as to demand so much from the cable companies.</p>
<p>Cable MSO&#8217;s are used to shelling out 25-30 cents per subscriber for TLC, TBS, Comedy Central. But paying terrestrial channels for the right to rebroadcast is new. CBS is just starting to get into the mix. Back in the early 90&#8217;s, &#8220;must carry&#8221; was the rule and cable balked at that (loss of channel space).</p>
<p>Despite what you think, cable companies really do want to keep your rates low. They can&#8217;t do that when every network on every channel is demanding payment. Dish and DirecTV are no different. It is not fair that Mediacom had to drop Sinclair&#8217;s stations because one side won&#8217;t budge and the other is being as flexible as possible. I applaud Mediacom for holding their ground and doing what they could to keep the stations on the lineup. They are still trying. I just wish Sinclair would realize that they are only hurting themselves by reducing the number of eyeballs they are reaching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-127413</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-127413</guid>
		<description>better get settled before the Daytona 500 or i will cancel mediacom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>better get settled before the Daytona 500 or i will cancel mediacom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-126542</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-126542</guid>
		<description>media and the dish they both suck.  i cant the rabbit ears to work.  both can stick it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>media and the dish they both suck.  i cant the rabbit ears to work.  both can stick it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-126449</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-126449</guid>
		<description>I too will be looking for a refund on that hefty 150.00 a month bill from mediacom. Spread a little of your wealth you take from your customers so that they can have the channel, and or shows they are paying dearly for. No Football Playoffs, no Courttv, no CSI and etc, well guess who will be saving 150.00 a month. I will definitly be getting a dishtv for my home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too will be looking for a refund on that hefty 150.00 a month bill from mediacom. Spread a little of your wealth you take from your customers so that they can have the channel, and or shows they are paying dearly for. No Football Playoffs, no Courttv, no CSI and etc, well guess who will be saving 150.00 a month. I will definitly be getting a dishtv for my home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-126040</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-126040</guid>
		<description>I live in one of the affected areas.  This whole situation is ridiculous.  I refuse to get a dish.  I had one for a while, and it was OK for what it was.  But I have 5 tv's in my house.  Do the math.  That's an extra $20 a month to get service to all of them.  On top of what I would pay for dish service similar to my cable?  I don't think so.

Instead of paying that extra $20 a month, I took a different direction.  I've only ever had analog cable.  And I don't get my internet service from the cable company.  So I took a modulator that I had around for another project, an old VCR, an antenna that I had around, and I ordered a filter online the blocks out signals above channel 86.  I hooked up the antenna to the VCR, set the VCR to my missing channel and remodulated the output of the VCR to a channel above the analog cable (92) and now I'm sitting here watching the playoff game on at least 3 sets in my house.  Assuming this goes on into the spring, I'll actually put up a real antenna.  Then I don't care.  The could pull off all the broadcast stations.  I've got enough old VCR's sitting around to make my own mini head-end system.

I applaud Mediacom's attempt to hold the line, but they mishandled the whole thing in the first place.  Sinclair on the other hand is granted the right to broadcast by the public in the form of the FCC.  They are already paid handsomly through advertising dollars for something they do very badly in my area.  I don't have any complaint with them being compensated for rebroadcast rights, but they need to get their collective heads out of their lower regions.  Medicom is willing to submit to binding arbritration.  Sinclair is refusing for two reasons.  In their minds, they're punishing Mediacom for suing them.  And they know their demands are unreasonable and that they won't get what they want out of arbitration.  The only way it's going to be solved is for the government to follow through and change the laws so the FCC can force both paties in to binding arbitration.  So, in the mean time, we have choices.  Get a dish, get an antenna, or go without.  I wish everyone well in their quest to replace lost programming :)

In case anyone's interested, I got the filter and modulator from a company called Smarthome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in one of the affected areas.  This whole situation is ridiculous.  I refuse to get a dish.  I had one for a while, and it was OK for what it was.  But I have 5 tv&#8217;s in my house.  Do the math.  That&#8217;s an extra $20 a month to get service to all of them.  On top of what I would pay for dish service similar to my cable?  I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Instead of paying that extra $20 a month, I took a different direction.  I&#8217;ve only ever had analog cable.  And I don&#8217;t get my internet service from the cable company.  So I took a modulator that I had around for another project, an old VCR, an antenna that I had around, and I ordered a filter online the blocks out signals above channel 86.  I hooked up the antenna to the VCR, set the VCR to my missing channel and remodulated the output of the VCR to a channel above the analog cable (92) and now I&#8217;m sitting here watching the playoff game on at least 3 sets in my house.  Assuming this goes on into the spring, I&#8217;ll actually put up a real antenna.  Then I don&#8217;t care.  The could pull off all the broadcast stations.  I&#8217;ve got enough old VCR&#8217;s sitting around to make my own mini head-end system.</p>
<p>I applaud Mediacom&#8217;s attempt to hold the line, but they mishandled the whole thing in the first place.  Sinclair on the other hand is granted the right to broadcast by the public in the form of the FCC.  They are already paid handsomly through advertising dollars for something they do very badly in my area.  I don&#8217;t have any complaint with them being compensated for rebroadcast rights, but they need to get their collective heads out of their lower regions.  Medicom is willing to submit to binding arbritration.  Sinclair is refusing for two reasons.  In their minds, they&#8217;re punishing Mediacom for suing them.  And they know their demands are unreasonable and that they won&#8217;t get what they want out of arbitration.  The only way it&#8217;s going to be solved is for the government to follow through and change the laws so the FCC can force both paties in to binding arbitration.  So, in the mean time, we have choices.  Get a dish, get an antenna, or go without.  I wish everyone well in their quest to replace lost programming <img src='http://www.lostremote.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In case anyone&#8217;s interested, I got the filter and modulator from a company called Smarthome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-125602</link>
		<dc:creator>lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 06:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-125602</guid>
		<description>I no longer get coverage on my favorite basketball team, because you money-hungrey excecs refuse to negotiate a small problem.  I do however recieve a bunch of other crappy stations that I never watch.  Think about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I no longer get coverage on my favorite basketball team, because you money-hungrey excecs refuse to negotiate a small problem.  I do however recieve a bunch of other crappy stations that I never watch.  Think about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misti</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-125584</link>
		<dc:creator>Misti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 06:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-125584</guid>
		<description>I want my C W back! I miss Not watching my show Supernatural! It's not fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want my C W back! I miss Not watching my show Supernatural! It&#8217;s not fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-124634</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-124634</guid>
		<description>How can you people start jerking channels during football
playoffs? Many people like myself have gone out and bought new big screen high def televisions to enjoy the programing you offer, now you want to TAKE IT BACK!!!!!!!This situation better be straightened out by the Daytona 500 or there is going to be a dish sitting in my yard!! And I know many other people feel the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you people start jerking channels during football<br />
playoffs? Many people like myself have gone out and bought new big screen high def televisions to enjoy the programing you offer, now you want to TAKE IT BACK!!!!!!!This situation better be straightened out by the Daytona 500 or there is going to be a dish sitting in my yard!! And I know many other people feel the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-122343</link>
		<dc:creator>carol kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-122343</guid>
		<description>like most people i don't have a good understanding of the problems going on other then money conflicts. i do understand that i have lost my abc channel &#38; i'm mad! if this can't be resolved then i'll be looking for an alternative to cable.
                       thanks 
                         c. kohler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like most people i don&#8217;t have a good understanding of the problems going on other then money conflicts. i do understand that i have lost my abc channel &amp; i&#8217;m mad! if this can&#8217;t be resolved then i&#8217;ll be looking for an alternative to cable.<br />
                       thanks<br />
                         c. kohler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themediacomchannel</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-122011</link>
		<dc:creator>themediacomchannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-122011</guid>
		<description>Don't hold your breath, Sue...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t hold your breath, Sue&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-121839</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-121839</guid>
		<description>I expect to see a refund in my cable bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect to see a refund in my cable bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-121296</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 05:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/05/mediacom-says-sinclair-wants-off-its-cable-lineup-now/#comment-121296</guid>
		<description>Cox communications and Belo's WWL-TV are doing the same thing here in New Orleans as well.  WWL-TV is the CBS affiliate and has the Super Bowl this year and since the Saints have a really good chance of going for the first time, both companies are waiting to see who blinks first.  Also, Cox and Belo have been negotiation for years on the CBS HD feed and I suspect that Cox is doing this so they can (hopefully) get CBS HD.  Won't bother me, I have DirecTV and HD OTA :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cox communications and Belo&#8217;s WWL-TV are doing the same thing here in New Orleans as well.  WWL-TV is the CBS affiliate and has the Super Bowl this year and since the Saints have a really good chance of going for the first time, both companies are waiting to see who blinks first.  Also, Cox and Belo have been negotiation for years on the CBS HD feed and I suspect that Cox is doing this so they can (hopefully) get CBS HD.  Won&#8217;t bother me, I have DirecTV and HD OTA <img src='http://www.lostremote.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
