<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspaper-TV partnerships strained by online video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/11/newspaper-tv-partnerships-strained-by-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/11/newspaper-tv-partnerships-strained-by-online/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: invitedmedia</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/11/newspaper-tv-partnerships-strained-by-online/#comment-124563</link>
		<dc:creator>invitedmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/11/newspaper-tv-partnerships-strained-by-online/#comment-124563</guid>
		<description>mouse, you're both in the crosshairs of "ebay, craigslist, google local, yahoo local".

why either of "you" continue to cut deals with them is beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mouse, you&#8217;re both in the crosshairs of &#8220;ebay, craigslist, google local, yahoo local&#8221;.</p>
<p>why either of &#8220;you&#8221; continue to cut deals with them is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anony Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/11/newspaper-tv-partnerships-strained-by-online/#comment-124538</link>
		<dc:creator>Anony Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/11/newspaper-tv-partnerships-strained-by-online/#comment-124538</guid>
		<description>Yawn. Somebody on the Post commented that TV stations would be gone in 5 to 10 years, because newspaper sites do video better. Uh, yeah, right. Frankly, you can get better video at YouTube off a cell phone in an Iraqi torture chamber than some of the stuff our newspaper bretheren are doing. 

If anybody is going to be gone soon, it'll be newspapers because you don't need all that staff to put out bridge columns and Doonesbury strips in the classifieds.

Bottom line, once newspapers move all their products to online, then they'll get to experience competition like we have in the TV industry for years. No more markets with one big newspaper information provider. There'll be lots of little guys (local TV, local radio, local blogs) and lots of big guys (eBay, Craigslist, Google local, Yahoo local) to take your audience away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn. Somebody on the Post commented that TV stations would be gone in 5 to 10 years, because newspaper sites do video better. Uh, yeah, right. Frankly, you can get better video at YouTube off a cell phone in an Iraqi torture chamber than some of the stuff our newspaper bretheren are doing. </p>
<p>If anybody is going to be gone soon, it&#8217;ll be newspapers because you don&#8217;t need all that staff to put out bridge columns and Doonesbury strips in the classifieds.</p>
<p>Bottom line, once newspapers move all their products to online, then they&#8217;ll get to experience competition like we have in the TV industry for years. No more markets with one big newspaper information provider. There&#8217;ll be lots of little guys (local TV, local radio, local blogs) and lots of big guys (eBay, Craigslist, Google local, Yahoo local) to take your audience away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/11/newspaper-tv-partnerships-strained-by-online/#comment-124505</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/11/newspaper-tv-partnerships-strained-by-online/#comment-124505</guid>
		<description>I feel that if I want to read an article's worth of copy, I'll head straight to a newspaper site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that if I want to read an article&#8217;s worth of copy, I&#8217;ll head straight to a newspaper site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
