<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backfence.com begins backpedaling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/16/backfencecom-begins-backpedaling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/16/backfencecom-begins-backpedaling/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/16/backfencecom-begins-backpedaling/#comment-128638</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/16/backfencecom-begins-backpedaling/#comment-128638</guid>
		<description>Drawn in to read, maybe. But my experience with this sort of thing has found that most people don't want to have to work to contribute. They'd rather just read.

Hyper local news will work with community input in some places, but I think most attempts will require paid contributors/journalists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drawn in to read, maybe. But my experience with this sort of thing has found that most people don&#8217;t want to have to work to contribute. They&#8217;d rather just read.</p>
<p>Hyper local news will work with community input in some places, but I think most attempts will require paid contributors/journalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swift Loris</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/16/backfencecom-begins-backpedaling/#comment-128225</link>
		<dc:creator>Swift Loris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/16/backfencecom-begins-backpedaling/#comment-128225</guid>
		<description>From the potential user's perspective (i.e., mine), I suspect that readers are more likely to become contributors when they see others like themselves contributing.

It might be worth a try to seed the site with ringers, quietly hiring a dozen or so community residents (NOT professional writers) to start the ball rolling by making posts and generating conversations among themselves on their own pet topics, keeping them at it for however long it takes to motivate others to join in.

There was an article in the NYTimes yesterday about a company called AmericanTowns.com that's trying to start local sites all over the country. I was surprised to find a site already in existence for my town, but disappointed to see that it had been set up to look as though it were a going concern when there was as yet no local participation, and where the as-yet empty areas reserved for reader contributions were a couple of layers deep into the site. It wasn't at all inviting.

If readers can see immediately--prominently on the home page--that their fellow community members are creating content, I think they're much more likely to be drawn in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the potential user&#8217;s perspective (i.e., mine), I suspect that readers are more likely to become contributors when they see others like themselves contributing.</p>
<p>It might be worth a try to seed the site with ringers, quietly hiring a dozen or so community residents (NOT professional writers) to start the ball rolling by making posts and generating conversations among themselves on their own pet topics, keeping them at it for however long it takes to motivate others to join in.</p>
<p>There was an article in the NYTimes yesterday about a company called AmericanTowns.com that&#8217;s trying to start local sites all over the country. I was surprised to find a site already in existence for my town, but disappointed to see that it had been set up to look as though it were a going concern when there was as yet no local participation, and where the as-yet empty areas reserved for reader contributions were a couple of layers deep into the site. It wasn&#8217;t at all inviting.</p>
<p>If readers can see immediately&#8211;prominently on the home page&#8211;that their fellow community members are creating content, I think they&#8217;re much more likely to be drawn in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/16/backfencecom-begins-backpedaling/#comment-128092</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/16/backfencecom-begins-backpedaling/#comment-128092</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Media analysts agree that many readers are looking for hyperlocal content&lt;/i&gt;

They left out the part that the readers want someone else to create the content, as they're too busy to do it themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Media analysts agree that many readers are looking for hyperlocal content</i></p>
<p>They left out the part that the readers want someone else to create the content, as they&#8217;re too busy to do it themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
