<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big media&#8217;s crush on social networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131964</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131964</guid>
		<description>I thought "(blah-blah) 2.0" was still the preferred buzzword, or is that soooooo 2006 of me and am I behind the times?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought &#8220;(blah-blah) 2.0&#8243; was still the preferred buzzword, or is that soooooo 2006 of me and am I behind the times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discreet_chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131570</link>
		<dc:creator>discreet_chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131570</guid>
		<description>Whew - That time my post took, but now I see that you do need the www in front for the url to work, so if you cut and paste, you'll need to add it.

And, as I said in my first attempt (where I had simply coded my name, but today marks the third and fourth time that recoding my name caused the messageboard to eat my comment), but anyway; I googled-up a  random reprint of what looks to be an official release because it was quicker and easier for me to use Yahoo!, rather than go to the horses' mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew - That time my post took, but now I see that you do need the www in front for the url to work, so if you cut and paste, you&#8217;ll need to add it.</p>
<p>And, as I said in my first attempt (where I had simply coded my name, but today marks the third and fourth time that recoding my name caused the messageboard to eat my comment), but anyway; I googled-up a  random reprint of what looks to be an official release because it was quicker and easier for me to use Yahoo!, rather than go to the horses&#8217; mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discreet_chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131568</link>
		<dc:creator>discreet_chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131568</guid>
		<description>OK - This is getting ridiculous because this marks the third time that I've tried to point toward a reprint of the "Heroes: 360" press release. The first two times, I tried coding my name and neither time worked, so now I'm using brackets. Once again, if this eventually ends-up being a dupe with or without moderation, I apologize.

superherohype[dot]com/news[dot]php?id=5110</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK - This is getting ridiculous because this marks the third time that I&#8217;ve tried to point toward a reprint of the &#8220;Heroes: 360&#8243; press release. The first two times, I tried coding my name and neither time worked, so now I&#8217;m using brackets. Once again, if this eventually ends-up being a dupe with or without moderation, I apologize.</p>
<p>superherohype[dot]com/news[dot]php?id=5110</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discreet_chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131561</link>
		<dc:creator>discreet_chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131561</guid>
		<description>"Social Networking" has to be THE preferred buzzword for the new year. I don't know, maybe it's because I'm old and cynical, but I read the fellow's post to say that they're going to make their show sites more supportive of the product, by adding forums, live chats and stuff along those lines. Well, bully for them and if they do successfully provide changing and interactive content, then perhaps there will be an increase in return traffic.

Hopefully they'll avoid the old Didney kids thing of charging for membership and perhaps they'll make their content more valuable to the viewer. After all, as a blogger, I do find it kind of ridiculous that I often find a better reference to a specific episode or show on non-NBC sites and by using the resources of iVillage, they may have a leg-up on some of what the other networks are currently offering.

Otherwise and finally, I will say that among all the official NBC show sites that I've seen, I do like the improvements to the one for SNL. And, I also have to wonder if the referenced "first launch on one of our biggest properties early next year" is the "Heroes: 360 Degrees" that we've seen a few ads about and I'm gathering will go live tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Social Networking&#8221; has to be THE preferred buzzword for the new year. I don&#8217;t know, maybe it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m old and cynical, but I read the fellow&#8217;s post to say that they&#8217;re going to make their show sites more supportive of the product, by adding forums, live chats and stuff along those lines. Well, bully for them and if they do successfully provide changing and interactive content, then perhaps there will be an increase in return traffic.</p>
<p>Hopefully they&#8217;ll avoid the old Didney kids thing of charging for membership and perhaps they&#8217;ll make their content more valuable to the viewer. After all, as a blogger, I do find it kind of ridiculous that I often find a better reference to a specific episode or show on non-NBC sites and by using the resources of iVillage, they may have a leg-up on some of what the other networks are currently offering.</p>
<p>Otherwise and finally, I will say that among all the official NBC show sites that I&#8217;ve seen, I do like the improvements to the one for SNL. And, I also have to wonder if the referenced &#8220;first launch on one of our biggest properties early next year&#8221; is the &#8220;Heroes: 360 Degrees&#8221; that we&#8217;ve seen a few ads about and I&#8217;m gathering will go live tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Geidner</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131483</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Geidner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/01/21/big-medias-crush-on-social-networking/#comment-131483</guid>
		<description>I think you missed a part of what the Internet is or at least should be. It shouldn't just be a way for "users to communicate and share via similar content across similar networks." It should also be used to open a user to new information and allow them to interact with different ideas and concepts. 

But beyond that, I think including social networking aspects into news sites, especially on the local level is imperative. Local TV and newspaper sites need to start building community through their sites by engaging users in stories from the community, connecting them to other people in the community, and allowing users to get involved in the community. Just an idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you missed a part of what the Internet is or at least should be. It shouldn&#8217;t just be a way for &#8220;users to communicate and share via similar content across similar networks.&#8221; It should also be used to open a user to new information and allow them to interact with different ideas and concepts. </p>
<p>But beyond that, I think including social networking aspects into news sites, especially on the local level is imperative. Local TV and newspaper sites need to start building community through their sites by engaging users in stories from the community, connecting them to other people in the community, and allowing users to get involved in the community. Just an idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
