Comments on: Now Diller disses YouTube http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/ Where TV Finds the Future Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:47:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Ralph Riccardi http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-168079 Ralph Riccardi Thu, 08 Feb 2007 21:24:08 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-168079 Doesn't IAC/Diller have a huge investment in Brightcove? Doesn’t IAC/Diller have a huge investment in Brightcove?

]]> By: Steve http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-168029 Steve Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:12:19 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-168029 JMT, You don't think the algorithm kings at Google aren't working on ways to better sort through YouTube's content? JMT,

You don’t think the algorithm kings at Google aren’t working on ways to better sort through YouTube’s content?

]]> By: JMT http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-167879 JMT Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:58:31 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-167879 Yes--those tools already ARE everywhere. Anyone can create a video-sharing site incredibly easily using Brightcove, Revver, EggNetwork or countless others...or by paying for hosting and bandwidth and keeping all the ad revenue. What I find perplexing is that each network has not yet created its own YouTube completer to stream all content. Why must they collaborate on a single site? What we will see, I am convinced, is an emergence of countless niche YouTubes with better-defined parameters. Steve, Google is Google because of its patented algorithm and unrivaled computing system. That’s starkly different from YouTube's sole value proposition--the fact that it is popular because it was early. Yes–those tools already ARE everywhere. Anyone can create a video-sharing site incredibly easily using Brightcove, Revver, EggNetwork or countless others…or by paying for hosting and bandwidth and keeping all the ad revenue.

What I find perplexing is that each network has not yet created its own YouTube completer to stream all content. Why must they collaborate on a single site?

What we will see, I am convinced, is an emergence of countless niche YouTubes with better-defined parameters.

Steve, Google is Google because of its patented algorithm and unrivaled computing system. That’s starkly different from YouTube’s sole value proposition–the fact that it is popular because it was early.

]]> By: Steve http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-167830 Steve Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:46:59 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-167830 Yeah, that Google's not going to last. Those search tools will be everywhere. Yeah, that Google’s not going to last. Those search tools will be everywhere.

]]> By: thedetroitchannel http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-167430 thedetroitchannel Thu, 08 Feb 2007 06:29:14 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/02/07/now-diller-disses-youtube/#comment-167430 "those tools are going to be everywhere". takes one to know one. “those tools are going to be everywhere”.

takes one to know one.

]]>