<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington state Senate passes shield law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/09/washington-state-senate-passes-shield-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/09/washington-state-senate-passes-shield-law/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: invitedmedia</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/09/washington-state-senate-passes-shield-law/#comment-213988</link>
		<dc:creator>invitedmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/09/washington-state-senate-passes-shield-law/#comment-213988</guid>
		<description>good luck with having "a law".

this current admin. has no respect for the rule of.

that silly old constitution.

it was over 200 years old for christ sake!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good luck with having &#8220;a law&#8221;.</p>
<p>this current admin. has no respect for the rule of.</p>
<p>that silly old constitution.</p>
<p>it was over 200 years old for christ sake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Gannon</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/09/washington-state-senate-passes-shield-law/#comment-213788</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/09/washington-state-senate-passes-shield-law/#comment-213788</guid>
		<description>So then this law wouldn't help the blogger from Tacoma. However, that's a pretty loose definition open to broad interpretation by the courts, particularly if you consider something that's online to be "published." The courts would if it was a libel case against an online posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So then this law wouldn&#8217;t help the blogger from Tacoma. However, that&#8217;s a pretty loose definition open to broad interpretation by the courts, particularly if you consider something that&#8217;s online to be &#8220;published.&#8221; The courts would if it was a libel case against an online posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
