<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of the Media: In which category is your site?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/12/state-of-the-media-2007-in-which-category-is-your-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/12/state-of-the-media-2007-in-which-category-is-your-site/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GowPaureFaura</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/12/state-of-the-media-2007-in-which-category-is-your-site/#comment-1168189</link>
		<dc:creator>GowPaureFaura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/12/state-of-the-media-2007-in-which-category-is-your-site/#comment-1168189</guid>
		<description>Многие азартные игроки, как за рубежом, так и у нас в стране, привлекали и привлекают математический аппарат (в частности, теорию вероятности) в попытке создать выигрышную стратегию для числовых лотерей, к которым относятся Спортлото и популярная во всем мире лотерея Кено. Большинство из них основывается на многоуровневом анализе большой выборки результатов предыдущих тиражей, как например предлагает делать Георг Гоулдман</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Многие азартные игроки, как за рубежом, так и у нас в стране, привлекали и привлекают математический аппарат (в частности, теорию вероятности) в попытке создать выигрышную стратегию для числовых лотерей, к которым относятся Спортлото и популярная во всем мире лотерея Кено. Большинство из них основывается на многоуровневом анализе большой выборки результатов предыдущих тиражей, как например предлагает делать Георг Гоулдман</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Salas</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/12/state-of-the-media-2007-in-which-category-is-your-site/#comment-228337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Salas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/12/state-of-the-media-2007-in-which-category-is-your-site/#comment-228337</guid>
		<description>...but getting back to the point of the post, I'd hope that our work at KUAM would be in the High Achievers category.  We make a ton of content available through a plethora of channels.

(A guy can dream in lieu of hard data, right?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but getting back to the point of the post, I&#8217;d hope that our work at KUAM would be in the High Achievers category.  We make a ton of content available through a plethora of channels.</p>
<p>(A guy can dream in lieu of hard data, right?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/12/state-of-the-media-2007-in-which-category-is-your-site/#comment-225109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/12/state-of-the-media-2007-in-which-category-is-your-site/#comment-225109</guid>
		<description>I find the whole original content issue to be tricky.  The time I spend rewriting my news stories for the web tells me that I'm producing "original" content.  Often that content posts before the TV story, sometimes after the story airs.  Fewer people are watching our TV products.  Doesn't it make sense to put that product on-line?  

Of course, in the "jack of all trade" type of website (mine is one of those), it's hard to find the original content being created (blogs, videoblogs, slideshows, etc.).

If "original" content means crappy stories that don't even come close to making the cut to go on TV, what's the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the whole original content issue to be tricky.  The time I spend rewriting my news stories for the web tells me that I&#8217;m producing &#8220;original&#8221; content.  Often that content posts before the TV story, sometimes after the story airs.  Fewer people are watching our TV products.  Doesn&#8217;t it make sense to put that product on-line?  </p>
<p>Of course, in the &#8220;jack of all trade&#8221; type of website (mine is one of those), it&#8217;s hard to find the original content being created (blogs, videoblogs, slideshows, etc.).</p>
<p>If &#8220;original&#8221; content means crappy stories that don&#8217;t even come close to making the cut to go on TV, what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
