Comments on: Tour WSJ.com’s video facilities http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/23/tour-wsjcoms-video-facilities/ Where TV Finds the Future Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:20:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: John http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/23/tour-wsjcoms-video-facilities/#comment-508272 John Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:15:33 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/23/tour-wsjcoms-video-facilities/#comment-508272 myfreepaysite.com/members myfreepaysite.com/members

]]> By: jim wilson http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/23/tour-wsjcoms-video-facilities/#comment-253032 jim wilson Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:00:21 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/23/tour-wsjcoms-video-facilities/#comment-253032 you know... the tech part of this is irrelevant... newspapers need to figure out what the HECK video they should shoot to start with they have no clue what should actually BE video... it's like someone reading the newspaper on radio... they NEED to grow a brain, not spend their time figuring out what Avid system to buy of course, using your brain to do anything other than "gotcha" journalism is hard work... so... we'll be seeing bad video from newspapers for years to come.. sadly you know…

the tech part of this is irrelevant… newspapers need to figure out what the HECK video they should shoot to start with

they have no clue what should actually BE video…

it’s like someone reading the newspaper on radio… they NEED to grow a brain, not spend their time figuring out what Avid system to buy

of course, using your brain to do anything other than “gotcha” journalism is hard work… so… we’ll be seeing bad video from newspapers for years to come.. sadly

]]> By: Steve http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/23/tour-wsjcoms-video-facilities/#comment-251707 Steve Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:58:54 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/03/23/tour-wsjcoms-video-facilities/#comment-251707 Too bad they didn't explain why they have both Avid and FCP -- is the Avid used for finishing? Too bad they didn’t explain why they have both Avid and FCP — is the Avid used for finishing?

]]>