<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT, Gannett, Tribune report declines, Google up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ContextWeb Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-283013</link>
		<dc:creator>ContextWeb Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-283013</guid>
		<description>It's too early to suggest is Yahoo is 'done for' but it certainly seems like they're a bit slow on the uptake.  

I agree about Yahoo 'building knockoffs' instead of smart acquisitions.  I think they have made some lower dollar level such as mybloglog which are a step in the right direction. But as for big ideas.. they seem to have cement shoes.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too early to suggest is Yahoo is &#8216;done for&#8217; but it certainly seems like they&#8217;re a bit slow on the uptake.  </p>
<p>I agree about Yahoo &#8216;building knockoffs&#8217; instead of smart acquisitions.  I think they have made some lower dollar level such as mybloglog which are a step in the right direction. But as for big ideas.. they seem to have cement shoes.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-282110</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-282110</guid>
		<description>dunno, depends on what you use to define a \'technology\' company. yesterday, i replied in the comments to the trib local post that web 2.0 is about providing online services. google is clearly working a strategy of providing advertising services (on pretty much all platforms), helping micro and macro publishers monetize their content in various ways using tools rather than putting all their eggs in the basket that focuses on retaining users on their pages. 

yahoo seems to be pushing a strategy of mega content aggregation, as well as offering personalization, socialization, and other such services/tools to retain users on their pages. while google does offer similar personalization tools, they seem to regard them more as entrepreneurial experiments and their core search business is designed as a hit and run. 

although they are online pioneers, yahoo is very reactive in the service space. if there is a myspace, yahoo develops their own knockoff version of it. meanwhile, google is growing new businesses the murdoch way, through smart acquisitions. yahoo\'s has had hits there too, though, such as flickr. 

i wondered how wall street would react when yahoo announced the newspaper consortium deal. would investors and analysts find the equivalent of an online superstore of content attractive? seems like they have spoken for now, but time will tell if the long tail strategy and the megaaggregator strategy either compliment or conflict with each other. 

as for the right now, clearly google is not so interested in making their own content, but they are very interested in helping you with yours. socially speaking, we all like people who offer us help, listen to us, and seem more interested in what we have to say than what they have to say. based on what we are seeing and hearing, google may be the most evolved and enlightened company from top to bottom, inside and out, anywhere in the world today. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dunno, depends on what you use to define a \&#8217;technology\&#8217; company. yesterday, i replied in the comments to the trib local post that web 2.0 is about providing online services. google is clearly working a strategy of providing advertising services (on pretty much all platforms), helping micro and macro publishers monetize their content in various ways using tools rather than putting all their eggs in the basket that focuses on retaining users on their pages. </p>
<p>yahoo seems to be pushing a strategy of mega content aggregation, as well as offering personalization, socialization, and other such services/tools to retain users on their pages. while google does offer similar personalization tools, they seem to regard them more as entrepreneurial experiments and their core search business is designed as a hit and run. </p>
<p>although they are online pioneers, yahoo is very reactive in the service space. if there is a myspace, yahoo develops their own knockoff version of it. meanwhile, google is growing new businesses the murdoch way, through smart acquisitions. yahoo\&#8217;s has had hits there too, though, such as flickr. </p>
<p>i wondered how wall street would react when yahoo announced the newspaper consortium deal. would investors and analysts find the equivalent of an online superstore of content attractive? seems like they have spoken for now, but time will tell if the long tail strategy and the megaaggregator strategy either compliment or conflict with each other. </p>
<p>as for the right now, clearly google is not so interested in making their own content, but they are very interested in helping you with yours. socially speaking, we all like people who offer us help, listen to us, and seem more interested in what we have to say than what they have to say. based on what we are seeing and hearing, google may be the most evolved and enlightened company from top to bottom, inside and out, anywhere in the world today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invitedmedia</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-282083</link>
		<dc:creator>invitedmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-282083</guid>
		<description>neither.

both will have to adapt to each other.

the problem lies in where one typically either "does business" with the other or sues them if things don't go their way.

i'll let you decide to which i refer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neither.</p>
<p>both will have to adapt to each other.</p>
<p>the problem lies in where one typically either &#8220;does business&#8221; with the other or sues them if things don&#8217;t go their way.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll let you decide to which i refer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-282068</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-282068</guid>
		<description>What is the better play? A technology company finding themselves in the media business, or a media company finding themselves in the technology business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the better play? A technology company finding themselves in the media business, or a media company finding themselves in the technology business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-282033</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/20/ny-times-gannett-tribune-report-declines/#comment-282033</guid>
		<description>this makes yahoo's dive earlier this week even more interesting. it certainly makes a statement about what wall street values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this makes yahoo&#8217;s dive earlier this week even more interesting. it certainly makes a statement about what wall street values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
