<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New AOL.com looks a lot like Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/#comment-293115</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/#comment-293115</guid>
		<description>The funniest part about this is that Yahoo's current homepage grid is almost exactly MSN's as of a few years ago (just google "MSN homepage designs").</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funniest part about this is that Yahoo&#8217;s current homepage grid is almost exactly MSN&#8217;s as of a few years ago (just google &#8220;MSN homepage designs&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/#comment-290993</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/#comment-290993</guid>
		<description>It is a complete clone. But, Yahoo! is pretty easy to read and navitage, IMHO. So, it's not a BAD thing. It's just an unoriginal thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a complete clone. But, Yahoo! is pretty easy to read and navitage, IMHO. So, it&#8217;s not a BAD thing. It&#8217;s just an unoriginal thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/#comment-290934</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/#comment-290934</guid>
		<description>WOW. It is a complete clone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. It is a complete clone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Creedle</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/#comment-290843</link>
		<dc:creator>George Creedle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/04/27/new-aolcom-looks-a-lot-like-yahoo/#comment-290843</guid>
		<description>When will websites learn about white space and different sized text. I cannot look at Yahoo because it looks like a jumbled mess (now AOL, too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will websites learn about white space and different sized text. I cannot look at Yahoo because it looks like a jumbled mess (now AOL, too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
