<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rupert Murdoch bids for Dow Jones Company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: News Consumer</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293894</link>
		<dc:creator>News Consumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293894</guid>
		<description>CNBC has a five year exclusive contract with the WSJ, but that doesn't mean it can't be broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNBC has a five year exclusive contract with the WSJ, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it can&#8217;t be broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293793</guid>
		<description>I was amused by the simple fact that CNBC broke the story rather than Fox News. 

(Does CNBC still partner with WSJ? I don't watch 'em much lately.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was amused by the simple fact that CNBC broke the story rather than Fox News. </p>
<p>(Does CNBC still partner with WSJ? I don&#8217;t watch &#8216;em much lately.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293791</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293791</guid>
		<description>I'm curious of what they'd do with Marketwatch.  Perhaps it would morph into the primary site for the Fox Business Channel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious of what they&#8217;d do with Marketwatch.  Perhaps it would morph into the primary site for the Fox Business Channel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Safran</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293776</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Safran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293776</guid>
		<description>I'm looking forward to Homer Simpson's market analysis: "The D'oh! Industrial Average..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to Homer Simpson&#8217;s market analysis: &#8220;The D&#8217;oh! Industrial Average&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293764</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/05/01/rupert-murdoch-wants-the-street/#comment-293764</guid>
		<description>God, just imagine the implications of America's premiere source of business news being corrupted by the same sort of ideological zeal that has fueled Fox News.  While the WSJ opinion pages aren't taken seriously even now, at least the editorial department is clearly separated from the superb news department, perhaps by a planet or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, just imagine the implications of America&#8217;s premiere source of business news being corrupted by the same sort of ideological zeal that has fueled Fox News.  While the WSJ opinion pages aren&#8217;t taken seriously even now, at least the editorial department is clearly separated from the superb news department, perhaps by a planet or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
