Comments on: FCC chief drops F-bomb after indecency ruling

By: jus_me

jus_me — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:55:41 +0000

The FCC says it can’t determine the sexual content of certain words because they are old prudes who only know the literal definitions. When Nicole Ritchie couldn’t get the cow shit (literal) out of her Prada, I’m thinking she was not considering fucking (having sex with) the cows. It’s an expression, shitheads (literal).

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:12:07 +0000

Dude, a bare breast isn’t porn. It’s baby food.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:15:37 +0000

Just for the record, this ruling is specific to expletives on live television.

I wonder if this could be applied to live porn, too, such as some Janet booby.

By: Katherine Westphal

Katherine Westphal — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:36:00 +0000

I believe there was a survey that said that more Americans believe in aliens than want the government to regulate the content on TV.

The FCC is never gong to fix the problems with TV content. The media moguls are too powerful, as evidenced by the ruling.

Parents have to take control. Learn how to use the v-chip. Keep track of the shows kids watch. Don’t put TV’s in kids’ bedrooms where parents can’t control what kids watch. Cut the cable, if necessary (that’ll limit the amount of indecent content kids are exposed to). And if all else fails, get rid of the TV.

By: Swift Loris

Swift Loris — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:28:56 +0000

Seriously, what would happen if a reporter read that statement, in full, on TV?

Probably be funnier if the naughty bits were conspicuously bleeped (Jon Stewart, you listening?). But I’d really love to see how the FCC would react if they weren’t.

By: Steve Safran

Steve Safran — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:17:21 +0000

At a fine of $325,000 per indecent incident, Martin owes himself $975,000.