<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: &#8216;Convergence&#8217; beginning to slow online sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-345642</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-345642</guid>
		<description>I think that the Borrell report is tainted.  We are having a block buster year with combined online and convergence sales up 62% over last year.  This is with a multi million dollar base.  Everyone has seen the reports that the combination of TV and Online has more impact for advertisers then pure online.  

Stations need to look at what they are selling and how they are selling.  If you target niche market opportunities as we have seen in Cory's most recent listing of special products you will have significant success.  

The trap that we fall into is to play the pure play game.  The best approach is to look locally and to develop a plan that fits the profile of the station and can deliver to the needs of the advertiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the Borrell report is tainted.  We are having a block buster year with combined online and convergence sales up 62% over last year.  This is with a multi million dollar base.  Everyone has seen the reports that the combination of TV and Online has more impact for advertisers then pure online.  </p>
<p>Stations need to look at what they are selling and how they are selling.  If you target niche market opportunities as we have seen in Cory&#8217;s most recent listing of special products you will have significant success.  </p>
<p>The trap that we fall into is to play the pure play game.  The best approach is to look locally and to develop a plan that fits the profile of the station and can deliver to the needs of the advertiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: !</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-345620</link>
		<dc:creator>!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-345620</guid>
		<description>still unclear how a dedicated sales staff can make a living at the rates online now is being offered at.

goog's automated process has no fringe bene's, vacation days, sick days, mileage allowance, etc.

but it lacks those important "touch points". i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still unclear how a dedicated sales staff can make a living at the rates online now is being offered at.</p>
<p>goog&#8217;s automated process has no fringe bene&#8217;s, vacation days, sick days, mileage allowance, etc.</p>
<p>but it lacks those important &#8220;touch points&#8221;. i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Day</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-344832</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-344832</guid>
		<description>Ahh.  Well... I eat my words.  That's is indeed a pretty tiny percentage.

(This is where I go hide)

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh.  Well&#8230; I eat my words.  That&#8217;s is indeed a pretty tiny percentage.</p>
<p>(This is where I go hide)</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.lostremote.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-344805</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-344805</guid>
		<description>Remember, that's of local ONLINE dollars, not total local ad dollars.

Local TV stations have something like 80% of local TV ad dollars, if not more, depending on local cable.

So 7.7% of local online dollars -- as we look to this new media to help save us from the declines in TV dollars -- is rather pathetic, IMHO.

Although it has grown and newspapers -- which are WAY ahead -- are losing some ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, that&#8217;s of local ONLINE dollars, not total local ad dollars.</p>
<p>Local TV stations have something like 80% of local TV ad dollars, if not more, depending on local cable.</p>
<p>So 7.7% of local online dollars &#8212; as we look to this new media to help save us from the declines in TV dollars &#8212; is rather pathetic, IMHO.</p>
<p>Although it has grown and newspapers &#8212; which are WAY ahead &#8212; are losing some ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Day</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-344739</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/05/what-local-media-websites-earn/#comment-344739</guid>
		<description>Only 7.7%?

In a vast media landscape - for any "new" medium to have 7.7% of ad spend seems like a big number.

Print
Radio
Direct Mail
Television
Billboard/outdoor
Non-local media (ie Google)
Television websites
Print websites
Other

...those are a lot of pie pieces.  For TV websites to take 7.7% seems like a rather large chunk for something that has only been around for just a decade or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 7.7%?</p>
<p>In a vast media landscape - for any &#8220;new&#8221; medium to have 7.7% of ad spend seems like a big number.</p>
<p>Print<br />
Radio<br />
Direct Mail<br />
Television<br />
Billboard/outdoor<br />
Non-local media (ie Google)<br />
Television websites<br />
Print websites<br />
Other</p>
<p>&#8230;those are a lot of pie pieces.  For TV websites to take 7.7% seems like a rather large chunk for something that has only been around for just a decade or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
