<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN jumps ahead of MSNBC in web rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/15/cnn-jumps-ahead-of-msnbc-in-web-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/15/cnn-jumps-ahead-of-msnbc-in-web-rankings/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: background</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/15/cnn-jumps-ahead-of-msnbc-in-web-rankings/#comment-365489</link>
		<dc:creator>background</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 20:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/15/cnn-jumps-ahead-of-msnbc-in-web-rankings/#comment-365489</guid>
		<description>Yep, the IB numbers (minus the NBCOO sites) are rolled into the CNN digital numbers beginning with the latest round of numbers. There's supposed to also be some subset breakout of the overall IB numbers, but having not seen the monthly report, I'm not sure that happened.

This helps to explain CNN's attraction to the deal, since it dramatically boosts their overall numbers, and options for national advertisers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the IB numbers (minus the NBCOO sites) are rolled into the CNN digital numbers beginning with the latest round of numbers. There&#8217;s supposed to also be some subset breakout of the overall IB numbers, but having not seen the monthly report, I&#8217;m not sure that happened.</p>
<p>This helps to explain CNN&#8217;s attraction to the deal, since it dramatically boosts their overall numbers, and options for national advertisers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/15/cnn-jumps-ahead-of-msnbc-in-web-rankings/#comment-365179</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/15/cnn-jumps-ahead-of-msnbc-in-web-rankings/#comment-365179</guid>
		<description>These figures are the number of unique users who visit the site each month. Is that correct?

How meaningful are they without average number of visits per user &#38; average time per visit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These figures are the number of unique users who visit the site each month. Is that correct?</p>
<p>How meaningful are they without average number of visits per user &amp; average time per visit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/15/cnn-jumps-ahead-of-msnbc-in-web-rankings/#comment-361543</link>
		<dc:creator>Net Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/06/15/cnn-jumps-ahead-of-msnbc-in-web-rankings/#comment-361543</guid>
		<description>Add USA Today.com + Gannett Newspapers.com + Gannett TV.com = #4 this month.   All the rest add the sum of its parts, so this is a fair metric/comparison.  And, yes, I am among those partial to Gannett and its growing online/digital story...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add USA Today.com + Gannett Newspapers.com + Gannett TV.com = #4 this month.   All the rest add the sum of its parts, so this is a fair metric/comparison.  And, yes, I am among those partial to Gannett and its growing online/digital story&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
