<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: Traditional TV is pretty close to dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JoeMo</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-418639</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-418639</guid>
		<description>@jo_cstd - depends, if you are talking about the medium in which modern day television is being delivered you are almost certainly wrong.  Conceptually speaking television will be around for a long time, as long as lazy parents need cheap babysitters we will have television in some form (most likely IPTV in next few years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jo_cstd - depends, if you are talking about the medium in which modern day television is being delivered you are almost certainly wrong.  Conceptually speaking television will be around for a long time, as long as lazy parents need cheap babysitters we will have television in some form (most likely IPTV in next few years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo_cstd</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-418445</link>
		<dc:creator>jo_cstd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-418445</guid>
		<description>I disagree. 

TV is far from dead. The internet (IMHO) is more like a 'supplement' to television. It can never replace it fully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. </p>
<p>TV is far from dead. The internet (IMHO) is more like a &#8217;supplement&#8217; to television. It can never replace it fully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417830</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417830</guid>
		<description>fair enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fair enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417638</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417638</guid>
		<description>Detroit - I'm not sure we're disagreeing about anything except a single word.

Yes. The landscape is changing and I also regularly watch out-of-market and network streams. My point was that from the article, I'm not seeing anything new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Detroit - I&#8217;m not sure we&#8217;re disagreeing about anything except a single word.</p>
<p>Yes. The landscape is changing and I also regularly watch out-of-market and network streams. My point was that from the article, I&#8217;m not seeing anything new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedetroitchannel</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417627</link>
		<dc:creator>thedetroitchannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417627</guid>
		<description>lurker, ! is my alter id (as are 50-some other place-based domain names depending on the subject matter of the comment).

therefore, it was ME that posted i was watching thehawaiichannel.com .  which actually bolsters the googguy's postulation that the "traditional" broadcast is dying and  simultaneously the future is pretty bright; i have a longtime connection to the islands... as i do the windy city and south florida too. the "traditional" 60 mile radus that broadcasters fought so hard to protect is now wide open to "foreign" competition.

the only thing to hash out is to monetize my eyeballs... which we have just about fleshed out here several times over.

but i still watch a lot less "traditional" tv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lurker, ! is my alter id (as are 50-some other place-based domain names depending on the subject matter of the comment).</p>
<p>therefore, it was ME that posted i was watching thehawaiichannel.com .  which actually bolsters the googguy&#8217;s postulation that the &#8220;traditional&#8221; broadcast is dying and  simultaneously the future is pretty bright; i have a longtime connection to the islands&#8230; as i do the windy city and south florida too. the &#8220;traditional&#8221; 60 mile radus that broadcasters fought so hard to protect is now wide open to &#8220;foreign&#8221; competition.</p>
<p>the only thing to hash out is to monetize my eyeballs&#8230; which we have just about fleshed out here several times over.</p>
<p>but i still watch a lot less &#8220;traditional&#8221; tv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417611</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417611</guid>
		<description>Heck - If you want to take targeting ads to a niche audience all the way back, you could just look at PBS program sponsors. It isn't really a new concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck - If you want to take targeting ads to a niche audience all the way back, you could just look at PBS program sponsors. It isn&#8217;t really a new concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417606</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417606</guid>
		<description>tdc - I said "nonsense" because I'm not seeing anything in the article that hasn't already been known. 

As someone earlier said, they were watching Hawaii television via the web, but it's still television and its primary market is still Hawaii; "West Wing" stayed on for so long because it had high income viewers and before them, "Frasier" may have held that distinction; Sears product-placements and targets ads during Ty Pennington, etc. etc. etc.

With hundreds of channels and video-on-demand, there's a multitude of ways to reach a targeted niche audience and that's pretty much common knowledge. It didn't take a Google executive to tell anyone, nor was he needed to say that advertisers should try to make ads that people won't skip (something that's been around for over a decade) and his Adwords plug really was just that and nothing more. If anything, how would "Google, keyword moon &#38; stars" really differ from "for more of The Apprentice, go to Yahoo.com"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tdc - I said &#8220;nonsense&#8221; because I&#8217;m not seeing anything in the article that hasn&#8217;t already been known. </p>
<p>As someone earlier said, they were watching Hawaii television via the web, but it&#8217;s still television and its primary market is still Hawaii; &#8220;West Wing&#8221; stayed on for so long because it had high income viewers and before them, &#8220;Frasier&#8221; may have held that distinction; Sears product-placements and targets ads during Ty Pennington, etc. etc. etc.</p>
<p>With hundreds of channels and video-on-demand, there&#8217;s a multitude of ways to reach a targeted niche audience and that&#8217;s pretty much common knowledge. It didn&#8217;t take a Google executive to tell anyone, nor was he needed to say that advertisers should try to make ads that people won&#8217;t skip (something that&#8217;s been around for over a decade) and his Adwords plug really was just that and nothing more. If anything, how would &#8220;Google, keyword moon &amp; stars&#8221; really differ from &#8220;for more of The Apprentice, go to Yahoo.com&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417586</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417586</guid>
		<description>"spouting nonsense". ?

that's a relative term- see the story below where  "a study found"  broadband users actually watch more network tv.

right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;spouting nonsense&#8221;. ?</p>
<p>that&#8217;s a relative term- see the story below where  &#8220;a study found&#8221;  broadband users actually watch more network tv.</p>
<p>right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417584</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417584</guid>
		<description>If people would quit hiring these Googleheads for speeches, then maybe they'd stop spouting nonsense.

Uh... Target your content and your advertising and because a Google Search wouldn't be an audience measure by itself, buy Adwords, so they can treat it like AOL did their keywords in the 90s and that'll help Google become a portal... er... almost a monopoly... ah...maintain their dominance. (Yeah, that's the ticket)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people would quit hiring these Googleheads for speeches, then maybe they&#8217;d stop spouting nonsense.</p>
<p>Uh&#8230; Target your content and your advertising and because a Google Search wouldn&#8217;t be an audience measure by itself, buy Adwords, so they can treat it like AOL did their keywords in the 90s and that&#8217;ll help Google become a portal&#8230; er&#8230; almost a monopoly&#8230; ah&#8230;maintain their dominance. (Yeah, that&#8217;s the ticket)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hussman</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417511</link>
		<dc:creator>Hussman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417511</guid>
		<description>I got an idea... how about the big 4 (or 6) repurpose some of their cable offerings and offer them as digital channels for affiliates. BLAM! 10 *free* channels right there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got an idea&#8230; how about the big 4 (or 6) repurpose some of their cable offerings and offer them as digital channels for affiliates. BLAM! 10 *free* channels right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grandma 'Mo'</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417433</link>
		<dc:creator>grandma 'Mo'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417433</guid>
		<description>no sweater for you this christmas!

coal in your stocking too!!!

sob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no sweater for you this christmas!</p>
<p>coal in your stocking too!!!</p>
<p>sob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeMo</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417404</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417404</guid>
		<description>I don't think "traditional" television is dying, I think the public is just fed up with high cable bills, crappy service and cookie cutter reality tv shows, none of which are all that real.  I have 250+ channels and I only watch about 10 of them on a regular basis; I mean seriously, who needs a knitting channel anyways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8220;traditional&#8221; television is dying, I think the public is just fed up with high cable bills, crappy service and cookie cutter reality tv shows, none of which are all that real.  I have 250+ channels and I only watch about 10 of them on a regular basis; I mean seriously, who needs a knitting channel anyways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417083</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417083</guid>
		<description>Yup... smaller and blurier! Sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup&#8230; smaller and blurier! Sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: !</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417054</link>
		<dc:creator>!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/17/google-traditional-tv-is-pretty-close-to-dead/#comment-417054</guid>
		<description>traditional broadcast may be dying but it's after midnight here and i am enjoying the stream of the 6pm news out of hawaii.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>traditional broadcast may be dying but it&#8217;s after midnight here and i am enjoying the stream of the 6pm news out of hawaii.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
