<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN&#8217;s YouTube debate scores big ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/25/cnns-youtube-debate-a-ratings-score/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/25/cnns-youtube-debate-a-ratings-score/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/25/cnns-youtube-debate-a-ratings-score/#comment-425556</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/25/cnns-youtube-debate-a-ratings-score/#comment-425556</guid>
		<description>Most of the video questions shown at the debate seem to have about an average of 1,000 views on YouTube. 

Dramatic Chipmunk has 2,000,000+ views. 'Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the video questions shown at the debate seem to have about an average of 1,000 views on YouTube. </p>
<p>Dramatic Chipmunk has 2,000,000+ views. &#8216;Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/25/cnns-youtube-debate-a-ratings-score/#comment-424958</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/25/cnns-youtube-debate-a-ratings-score/#comment-424958</guid>
		<description>From the Reuters story,

"Included in the latest viewership numbers were 407,000 viewers in the coveted adults 18-34 demographic, which topped the previous record of 368,000 for the New Hampshire debate."

an extra 40,000 18-34 of the coveted bunch is hardly a grand slam for CNN. 

A more interesting number would be the total draw for the various You Tube videos of the debate. Although I suspect they'll be equally dismal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Reuters story,</p>
<p>&#8220;Included in the latest viewership numbers were 407,000 viewers in the coveted adults 18-34 demographic, which topped the previous record of 368,000 for the New Hampshire debate.&#8221;</p>
<p>an extra 40,000 18-34 of the coveted bunch is hardly a grand slam for CNN. </p>
<p>A more interesting number would be the total draw for the various You Tube videos of the debate. Although I suspect they&#8217;ll be equally dismal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
