<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSNBC.com had huge numbers covering bridge collapse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/06/msnbccom-had-huge-numbers-covering-bridge-collapse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/06/msnbccom-had-huge-numbers-covering-bridge-collapse/</link>
	<description>Where TV Meets Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:17:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: invitedmedia</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/06/msnbccom-had-huge-numbers-covering-bridge-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-445551</link>
		<dc:creator>invitedmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 05:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/06/msnbccom-had-huge-numbers-covering-bridge-collapse/#comment-445551</guid>
		<description>why wouldn&#039;t ib comment on traffic?

anything would be considered a success far as i&#039;m concerned as the site prior was nothing but a placeholder. but something tells me the numbers were far more impressive.

kinda scary for ib&#039;s tv partners as it&#039;s a sign you don&#039;t really need a station on the ground to have a destination packed with relevant content.

please grace us with some numbers!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why wouldn&#8217;t ib comment on traffic?</p>
<p>anything would be considered a success far as i&#8217;m concerned as the site prior was nothing but a placeholder. but something tells me the numbers were far more impressive.</p>
<p>kinda scary for ib&#8217;s tv partners as it&#8217;s a sign you don&#8217;t really need a station on the ground to have a destination packed with relevant content.</p>
<p>please grace us with some numbers!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/06/msnbccom-had-huge-numbers-covering-bridge-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-445238</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/06/msnbccom-had-huge-numbers-covering-bridge-collapse/#comment-445238</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m usually pretty vocal about revealing scoop sources, but in this case it doesn&#039;t really feel like it was &quot;scooped&quot; information.

Anyway, love that quote in there from Nancy about my old colleagues: &quot;[they] usually donâ€™t go out of the doors.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m usually pretty vocal about revealing scoop sources, but in this case it doesn&#8217;t really feel like it was &#8220;scooped&#8221; information.</p>
<p>Anyway, love that quote in there from Nancy about my old colleagues: &#8220;[they] usually donâ€™t go out of the doors.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

