http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/21/flash-to-include-h264-video/ Where TV Finds the Future Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:37:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/21/flash-to-include-h264-video/#comment-463764 Will Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:47:16 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/21/flash-to-include-h264-video/#comment-463764 What Flash needs is a codec that has both good quality and reasonable demands on system resources. Right now it has neither, and H.264 won't address the latter. What Flash needs is a codec that has both good quality and reasonable demands on system resources. Right now it has neither, and H.264 won’t address the latter.

]]> http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/21/flash-to-include-h264-video/#comment-463500 Dave Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:09:58 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/21/flash-to-include-h264-video/#comment-463500 Looks like a response to the impending debut of Silverlight and its HD video capabilities. Looks like a response to the impending debut of Silverlight and its HD video capabilities.

]]> http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/21/flash-to-include-h264-video/#comment-463446 ~bc Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:12:22 +0000 http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/21/flash-to-include-h264-video/#comment-463446 This could be amazing, if done well. But that's a big "if." Adobe has a mixed track record: for example, some simple Flash files run much faster on an old PC than on a new Mac (with the same Intel architecture, just much more horsepower). Hopefully, Adobe will be addressing that, too. This could be amazing, if done well. But that’s a big “if.” Adobe has a mixed track record: for example, some simple Flash files run much faster on an old PC than on a new Mac (with the same Intel architecture, just much more horsepower). Hopefully, Adobe will be addressing that, too.

]]>