<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Hey - more reasons not to try stuff on the web!&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/27/hey-more-reasons-not-to-try-stuff-on-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/27/hey-more-reasons-not-to-try-stuff-on-the-web/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brink</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/27/hey-more-reasons-not-to-try-stuff-on-the-web/#comment-469727</link>
		<dc:creator>Brink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/27/hey-more-reasons-not-to-try-stuff-on-the-web/#comment-469727</guid>
		<description>"Trying things." Yeah.

How about trying to give readers the most comprehensive, fact-based NEWS coverage (which is why they come to your site) instead of trying to pretend you're a "social notworking" site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Trying things.&#8221; Yeah.</p>
<p>How about trying to give readers the most comprehensive, fact-based NEWS coverage (which is why they come to your site) instead of trying to pretend you&#8217;re a &#8220;social notworking&#8221; site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/27/hey-more-reasons-not-to-try-stuff-on-the-web/#comment-469717</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/27/hey-more-reasons-not-to-try-stuff-on-the-web/#comment-469717</guid>
		<description>Some of the ideas were, "you're stupid to have even tried that," others were, "thanks for trying, but you did it wrong (and should have known better)," and the third class was, "thanks for trying,but if you keep trying, you'll do better next time (fail fast and learn from your mistakes)."

Overall the story was lacked direction, purpose or perspective.

Trying things and making mistakes isn't news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the ideas were, &#8220;you&#8217;re stupid to have even tried that,&#8221; others were, &#8220;thanks for trying, but you did it wrong (and should have known better),&#8221; and the third class was, &#8220;thanks for trying,but if you keep trying, you&#8217;ll do better next time (fail fast and learn from your mistakes).&#8221;</p>
<p>Overall the story was lacked direction, purpose or perspective.</p>
<p>Trying things and making mistakes isn&#8217;t news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Small</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/27/hey-more-reasons-not-to-try-stuff-on-the-web/#comment-469685</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Small</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/27/hey-more-reasons-not-to-try-stuff-on-the-web/#comment-469685</guid>
		<description>Right on. Besides, most bloggers just reposted the list without the narrative, making it yet another meaningless, overgeneralized "Top Tips" list.

Just because something fails for someone doesn't mean that thing always fails for everyone. Replace "fails" with "succeeds" and that last sentence still works. Either way, trendy tips that read like absolute rules of operation don't gibe with reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on. Besides, most bloggers just reposted the list without the narrative, making it yet another meaningless, overgeneralized &#8220;Top Tips&#8221; list.</p>
<p>Just because something fails for someone doesn&#8217;t mean that thing always fails for everyone. Replace &#8220;fails&#8221; with &#8220;succeeds&#8221; and that last sentence still works. Either way, trendy tips that read like absolute rules of operation don&#8217;t gibe with reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
