<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Vs. Thinking&#8217; Watch: OPA in London</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-472296</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-472296</guid>
		<description>Steve-- My full research from March regarding TPM's role in the AG story is here:

http://civilities.net/TalkingPointsMeme

They deserve tremendous credit, but at the time, some of the credit they were given was a bit over-the-top. As always, there were other "big" stories that the rest of the media-- and many blogs-- were focusing on: Libby trial, Walter Reed, the 2008 campaign, the Iraq surge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve&#8211; My full research from March regarding TPM&#8217;s role in the AG story is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://civilities.net/TalkingPointsMeme" rel="nofollow">http://civilities.net/TalkingPointsMeme</a></p>
<p>They deserve tremendous credit, but at the time, some of the credit they were given was a bit over-the-top. As always, there were other &#8220;big&#8221; stories that the rest of the media&#8211; and many blogs&#8211; were focusing on: Libby trial, Walter Reed, the 2008 campaign, the Iraq surge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-471489</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 04:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-471489</guid>
		<description>Wasn't it KHOU in Houston that exposed the problem with Firestone tires on Ford Explorers? Sounds like a TV station breaking a big story to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t it KHOU in Houston that exposed the problem with Firestone tires on Ford Explorers? Sounds like a TV station breaking a big story to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Safran</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-471132</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Safran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-471132</guid>
		<description>Roll Call broke that story. "The Official Newspaper of Capitol Hill Since 1955."

Sounds like a shady organization to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roll Call broke that story. &#8220;The Official Newspaper of Capitol Hill Since 1955.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like a shady organization to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-471117</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-471117</guid>
		<description>Not as much as Dan Rather. I thought Gonzales was a group effort, personally.

Where did the first word on Sen. Craig's bathroom trip come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not as much as Dan Rather. I thought Gonzales was a group effort, personally.</p>
<p>Where did the first word on Sen. Craig&#8217;s bathroom trip come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Gahran</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470993</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470993</guid>
		<description>Great post, Steve. As I look toward my grueling upcoming travel schedule of the next few months, which includes speaking gigs at several journalism conferences, I too am weary of the "vs thinking," especially regarding online media. 

I just let our fellow journalists know of your "Vs. thinking watch" over at Poynter's E-Media Tidbits.

http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&#38;aid=129161

Keep up the good work,

- Amy Gahran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Steve. As I look toward my grueling upcoming travel schedule of the next few months, which includes speaking gigs at several journalism conferences, I too am weary of the &#8220;vs thinking,&#8221; especially regarding online media. </p>
<p>I just let our fellow journalists know of your &#8220;Vs. thinking watch&#8221; over at Poynter&#8217;s E-Media Tidbits.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=129161" rel="nofollow">http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=129161</a></p>
<p>Keep up the good work,</p>
<p>- Amy Gahran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Safran</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470776</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Safran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470776</guid>
		<description>Oooh... interesting point. See, I first heard about the Gonzales thing on NPR, days before it broke elsewhere. (They interviewed one of the fired attorneys who was about to break the scandal wide open.) So I didn't associate it with bloggers being the primary engine of the story. Do the rest of the LR Faithful see Gonzales as a "blogger bringdown?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh&#8230; interesting point. See, I first heard about the Gonzales thing on NPR, days before it broke elsewhere. (They interviewed one of the fired attorneys who was about to break the scandal wide open.) So I didn&#8217;t associate it with bloggers being the primary engine of the story. Do the rest of the LR Faithful see Gonzales as a &#8220;blogger bringdown?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470770</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470770</guid>
		<description>bloggers are beholden to no one. 

tv is beholden to its advertisers. 

its advertisers are beholden to ....

you get the picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bloggers are beholden to no one. </p>
<p>tv is beholden to its advertisers. </p>
<p>its advertisers are beholden to &#8230;.</p>
<p>you get the picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470765</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470765</guid>
		<description>Anonymous made my first point.  My second point is when was the last time network or local news could make a similar kind of "we brought down...." claim.  Blogs and papers can do it but TV?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous made my first point.  My second point is when was the last time network or local news could make a similar kind of &#8220;we brought down&#8230;.&#8221; claim.  Blogs and papers can do it but TV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470757</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/08/28/vs-thinking-watch-opa-in-london/#comment-470757</guid>
		<description>Bloggers: "We brought down Alberto Gonzales!"

Remember, the rest of the press paid no attention to the mass firings of attorneys.  It took months of exclusive reporting on Talking Points Memo before the rest of the media realized there was a story there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloggers: &#8220;We brought down Alberto Gonzales!&#8221;</p>
<p>Remember, the rest of the press paid no attention to the mass firings of attorneys.  It took months of exclusive reporting on Talking Points Memo before the rest of the media realized there was a story there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
