<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSNBC putting Abrams back on the air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-503665</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-503665</guid>
		<description>While I've certainly been very critical of MSNBC, I think it's glib to just say that it's Bush Administration haters.

As they have moved towards a counterpoint to Fox, their ratings have increased, and that should tell them something. Aside from the politics, their best business move would be towards the left, which would set them apart from their competitors and give viewers a strong sense of their identity.

But that's not going to happen, since the network is under control of NBC News, and they value their "name" too much to allow strong partisan views to rule--no matter how good it would be for business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;ve certainly been very critical of MSNBC, I think it&#8217;s glib to just say that it&#8217;s Bush Administration haters.</p>
<p>As they have moved towards a counterpoint to Fox, their ratings have increased, and that should tell them something. Aside from the politics, their best business move would be towards the left, which would set them apart from their competitors and give viewers a strong sense of their identity.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not going to happen, since the network is under control of NBC News, and they value their &#8220;name&#8221; too much to allow strong partisan views to rule&#8211;no matter how good it would be for business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-503466</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-503466</guid>
		<description>MSNBC is a sinking ship.
They just need to accept that fact and move on to something else.  Maybe reformat the channel to a social networking - video hybrid.  

Afterall, what exactly is their "target" demographic??
Bush administration haters in need of nightly validation from Keith Olbermann?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSNBC is a sinking ship.<br />
They just need to accept that fact and move on to something else.  Maybe reformat the channel to a social networking - video hybrid.  </p>
<p>Afterall, what exactly is their &#8220;target&#8221; demographic??<br />
Bush administration haters in need of nightly validation from Keith Olbermann?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-502875</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-502875</guid>
		<description>I don't like Dan Abrams. Bad move, won't last very long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like Dan Abrams. Bad move, won&#8217;t last very long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-502359</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-502359</guid>
		<description>He's always on anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s always on anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-502323</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/09/24/msnbc-putting-abrams-back-on-the-air/#comment-502323</guid>
		<description>I don't understand MSNBC's decision to put Abrams back on the air in primetime. As a fill-in for Scarborough, he's a been almost unwatchable. Perhaps they think he'll be helpful for a potential OJ trial, but watching him try and talk pop culture is not unlike watching my grandmother try and freestyle rap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand MSNBC&#8217;s decision to put Abrams back on the air in primetime. As a fill-in for Scarborough, he&#8217;s a been almost unwatchable. Perhaps they think he&#8217;ll be helpful for a potential OJ trial, but watching him try and talk pop culture is not unlike watching my grandmother try and freestyle rap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
