<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valleywag: Yahoo Newspaper Consortium in trouble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/11/valleywag-yahoo-newspaper-consortium-in-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/11/valleywag-yahoo-newspaper-consortium-in-trouble/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mel Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/11/valleywag-yahoo-newspaper-consortium-in-trouble/#comment-521852</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/11/valleywag-yahoo-newspaper-consortium-in-trouble/#comment-521852</guid>
		<description>cory,
you know the ole saying:
buy, build or partner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cory,<br />
you know the ole saying:<br />
buy, build or partner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/11/valleywag-yahoo-newspaper-consortium-in-trouble/#comment-520847</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/11/valleywag-yahoo-newspaper-consortium-in-trouble/#comment-520847</guid>
		<description>Ok, I'll jump in here.  Safran, it takes millions and millions of dollars and teams of top-notch engineers to build an ad network with the sophistication of Yahoo (not even to speak of Google).

Yes, the newspapers could've partnered among themselves conceptually, but it's the technology that puts it into action.  Newspapers don't have the money or expertise to build it, so they need to partner.

Partnering is smart when it's not your core competency and the barriers to entry are high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll jump in here.  Safran, it takes millions and millions of dollars and teams of top-notch engineers to build an ad network with the sophistication of Yahoo (not even to speak of Google).</p>
<p>Yes, the newspapers could&#8217;ve partnered among themselves conceptually, but it&#8217;s the technology that puts it into action.  Newspapers don&#8217;t have the money or expertise to build it, so they need to partner.</p>
<p>Partnering is smart when it&#8217;s not your core competency and the barriers to entry are high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
