<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch: Killing the NY Times &#8220;would be nice&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/18/murdoch-killing-the-ny-times-would-be-nice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/18/murdoch-killing-the-ny-times-would-be-nice/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rocker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/18/murdoch-killing-the-ny-times-would-be-nice/#comment-529418</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/18/murdoch-killing-the-ny-times-would-be-nice/#comment-529418</guid>
		<description>Competition from MSNBC was good for CNN? With Britney, Anna Nicole, etc, it seems more like a race to the bottom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competition from MSNBC was good for CNN? With Britney, Anna Nicole, etc, it seems more like a race to the bottom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/18/murdoch-killing-the-ny-times-would-be-nice/#comment-529408</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/18/murdoch-killing-the-ny-times-would-be-nice/#comment-529408</guid>
		<description>Maybe it doesn't need to be killed, but it does need to be challenged.  Gotten lazy...too much group-think going on in that operation.  A robust competitor can only be a good thing from a public information p.o.v.  I expect journalistic standards at the WSJ will remain at least as robust as at the Times.  Come to think of it, not a very high bar anymore, sadly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it doesn&#8217;t need to be killed, but it does need to be challenged.  Gotten lazy&#8230;too much group-think going on in that operation.  A robust competitor can only be a good thing from a public information p.o.v.  I expect journalistic standards at the WSJ will remain at least as robust as at the Times.  Come to think of it, not a very high bar anymore, sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marylou howell</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/18/murdoch-killing-the-ny-times-would-be-nice/#comment-529394</link>
		<dc:creator>Marylou howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/18/murdoch-killing-the-ny-times-would-be-nice/#comment-529394</guid>
		<description>In Murdochs  Austrailians dreams.  His newspaper will be just like the post a rag....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Murdochs  Austrailians dreams.  His newspaper will be just like the post a rag&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
