ONA: Blogging ethics
Steve Safran October 18th, 2007
Amy Webb blogs this evening’s session on “blogging ethics” (there are ethics?) and it’s a topic that will raise some eyebrows. From Amy’s notes:
Very proud to announce that we’re developing a set of working blogging guidelines here at ONA that we’re hoping newsrooms will take and adapt for their own use.
Says someone from Bloomberg (I think - can’t hear): We’re all professional. We should never want to be accused of being not fair or not credible if we’re professional journalists. Why would we “spout uninformed opinion?” Journos shouldn’t blog. Employers shouldn’t necessarily allow blogging… It’s not “freedom of speech.” If you want total freedom, then don’t work for a large news organization.
Says me (Amy): Oddly, no one seems miffed by this statement. I think she’s missing the point here, and taking things to extreme levels.
Really? How did that get by without someone taking a swing? As it is, any discussion of a blogger code of ethics gets the ol’ one-two punch. But someone making a blanket statement like “journos shouldn’t blog” without being challenged by a room full of journalists?


1 Comment Add your own
1. mcw | October 20th, 2007 at 8:41 pm
Who had a chance to speak up? It wasn’t a discussion as much as random thoughts. And when a moderator labels some questions ‘good’ and is the only one with a mike can a good dicussion result?
Why would blogging ethics differ from journalism ethics?
The session raised questions and offered ideas to consider but I can’t see how ONA can succeed with this policy or guidelines
Leave a Comment
(Please keep URLs out of the comment body or the spam filter will block you.)Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed