<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comcast selectively blocking internet traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/#comment-532830</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/#comment-532830</guid>
		<description>must be a tdc wannabe on the loose.

you can tell by the punctuation that ain't ME!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>must be a tdc wannabe on the loose.</p>
<p>you can tell by the punctuation that ain&#8217;t ME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/#comment-530119</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/#comment-530119</guid>
		<description>I should have known something was up. I know this sounds cheap, but we were using them to push to a streaming server for a live stream for a TV station for a few months as a backup until our T-1's could be installed.

Their service was getting so spotty in our area a few weeks ago, and we had to bite the bullet and get T-1 lines for most of critical net needs. 

At one point a speed test showed we well over 768k for an upload spead, but it keep bottlenecking just pushing a 300k stream. Crashing our encoder.

Comcast no longer has an issue with our stream, but they have been relegated to backup Critical Data traffic, and we use or T-1's for things like Clipmail, Streaming, and ENG. 

We also use it for regular traffic (email/web surfing, because they can burst to 12Mbps and we do not want to overload the T-1s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have known something was up. I know this sounds cheap, but we were using them to push to a streaming server for a live stream for a TV station for a few months as a backup until our T-1&#8217;s could be installed.</p>
<p>Their service was getting so spotty in our area a few weeks ago, and we had to bite the bullet and get T-1 lines for most of critical net needs. </p>
<p>At one point a speed test showed we well over 768k for an upload spead, but it keep bottlenecking just pushing a 300k stream. Crashing our encoder.</p>
<p>Comcast no longer has an issue with our stream, but they have been relegated to backup Critical Data traffic, and we use or T-1&#8217;s for things like Clipmail, Streaming, and ENG. </p>
<p>We also use it for regular traffic (email/web surfing, because they can burst to 12Mbps and we do not want to overload the T-1s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/#comment-529616</link>
		<dc:creator>Net Neutrality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/#comment-529616</guid>
		<description>Forgot to start off the previous comment by stating that Net Neutrality goes well beyond just file sharing.  Big ISP's want to have full control over which sites they'll let you visit (or at least visit with any descent speed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to start off the previous comment by stating that Net Neutrality goes well beyond just file sharing.  Big ISP&#8217;s want to have full control over which sites they&#8217;ll let you visit (or at least visit with any descent speed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/#comment-529614</link>
		<dc:creator>Net Neutrality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/19/comcast-selectively-blocking-internet-traffic/#comment-529614</guid>
		<description>It's a serious danger.  How would if affect your station if you local cable giant decided to corner the market on local news by limiting it's internet customers to only a 56K connection to your all tv, radio, and newspaper website, but provided full throttle access to its own service? Don't laugh, that's what they want to do is to be able to limit high bandwidth to themselves and their preferred partners only!

Click the link for FAQ on Net Neutrality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a serious danger.  How would if affect your station if you local cable giant decided to corner the market on local news by limiting it&#8217;s internet customers to only a 56K connection to your all tv, radio, and newspaper website, but provided full throttle access to its own service? Don&#8217;t laugh, that&#8217;s what they want to do is to be able to limit high bandwidth to themselves and their preferred partners only!</p>
<p>Click the link for FAQ on Net Neutrality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
