<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox Business anchor or porn star?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: News Consumer</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-543615</link>
		<dc:creator>News Consumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-543615</guid>
		<description>Some of these female news readers are downright embarrassing, they have zero credentials to be presenting business news.  It's painful to watch.  The folks the WSJ should be afraid that if/when Murdock figures out a way to merge these two opperations, the tawdry tactics will rub off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of these female news readers are downright embarrassing, they have zero credentials to be presenting business news.  It&#8217;s painful to watch.  The folks the WSJ should be afraid that if/when Murdock figures out a way to merge these two opperations, the tawdry tactics will rub off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-541294</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-541294</guid>
		<description>I'm with Mike, the only reason I did as well as I did was because TVNewser had sent me to FBN's site already. Also, you could largely tell from facial expressions whether this was someone presenting something of a teleprompter or just being, um, porny. Dagen McDowell was tough, but I figured it was more likely an unflattering screen grab than what it actually looked like. And the background of Rebecca Gomez's pic was rather deceptive. In fact, Radar switched around the backgrounds of several of these photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Mike, the only reason I did as well as I did was because TVNewser had sent me to FBN&#8217;s site already. Also, you could largely tell from facial expressions whether this was someone presenting something of a teleprompter or just being, um, porny. Dagen McDowell was tough, but I figured it was more likely an unflattering screen grab than what it actually looked like. And the background of Rebecca Gomez&#8217;s pic was rather deceptive. In fact, Radar switched around the backgrounds of several of these photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Escutia</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-540328</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Escutia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-540328</guid>
		<description>I got 9 out of 10 right, but then, I'd perused FBN's pre-launch site a few weeks ago, so it was a matter of which faces I recognized.  "Nope, don't recognize that one.  Must be a porn star." ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got 9 out of 10 right, but then, I&#8217;d perused FBN&#8217;s pre-launch site a few weeks ago, so it was a matter of which faces I recognized.  &#8220;Nope, don&#8217;t recognize that one.  Must be a porn star.&#8221; <img src='http://www.lostremote.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-539767</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-539767</guid>
		<description>It's kind of obvious after you run through this quiz that the whole "beauty queen" thing is just a marketing tool. When they're side by side, there's really no question about which ones are the journalists and who makes money from their looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kind of obvious after you run through this quiz that the whole &#8220;beauty queen&#8221; thing is just a marketing tool. When they&#8217;re side by side, there&#8217;s really no question about which ones are the journalists and who makes money from their looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safran</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-539638</link>
		<dc:creator>Safran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/10/26/fox-business-anchor-or-porn-star/#comment-539638</guid>
		<description>Trick question. Both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trick question. Both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
