<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google &#8216;hugely dangerous&#8217; to newspaper industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/07/google-hugely-dangerous-to-newspaper-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/07/google-hugely-dangerous-to-newspaper-industry/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/07/google-hugely-dangerous-to-newspaper-industry/#comment-553333</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/07/google-hugely-dangerous-to-newspaper-industry/#comment-553333</guid>
		<description>with all due respect, aside from the $750 a share stock price (which makes them dangerous in all sorts of ways) whatever becomes of SLOW TO ADAPT newspapers (and tv for that matter) has little to do with google and more to do with clinging to the past.

BTW- cnn seems to be carrying headlines on their home screen from far more locals than only weeks ago. what gives? i thought that deal was exclusive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with all due respect, aside from the $750 a share stock price (which makes them dangerous in all sorts of ways) whatever becomes of SLOW TO ADAPT newspapers (and tv for that matter) has little to do with google and more to do with clinging to the past.</p>
<p>BTW- cnn seems to be carrying headlines on their home screen from far more locals than only weeks ago. what gives? i thought that deal was exclusive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
