<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designs MSNBC.com left behind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/12/designs-msnbccom-left-behind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/12/designs-msnbccom-left-behind/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/12/designs-msnbccom-left-behind/#comment-564053</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/12/designs-msnbccom-left-behind/#comment-564053</guid>
		<description>Don: Which of those others would you rather have? Why? It's that kind of discussion I was hoping the Alpha Channel post would generate.

Dave: The 'sample platter' designs didn't play well with user groups. Groups aren't the end all, but they do help with direction at a high level if done well. And on that point, it really doesn't matter which designs I personally prefer. It's not my website. I like whatever I think will be most effective for our users and advances our journalism. I'm confident the final msnbc.com homepage design does that. It's a clean vision with little to no compromises, which is exceedingly rare in redesigns. But if usage proves us wrong, we're standing by to make changes. With any luck, this is our last major redesign. I prefer quickly and constantly evolving in small ways that add up to big differences over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don: Which of those others would you rather have? Why? It&#8217;s that kind of discussion I was hoping the Alpha Channel post would generate.</p>
<p>Dave: The &#8217;sample platter&#8217; designs didn&#8217;t play well with user groups. Groups aren&#8217;t the end all, but they do help with direction at a high level if done well. And on that point, it really doesn&#8217;t matter which designs I personally prefer. It&#8217;s not my website. I like whatever I think will be most effective for our users and advances our journalism. I&#8217;m confident the final msnbc.com homepage design does that. It&#8217;s a clean vision with little to no compromises, which is exceedingly rare in redesigns. But if usage proves us wrong, we&#8217;re standing by to make changes. With any luck, this is our last major redesign. I prefer quickly and constantly evolving in small ways that add up to big differences over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/12/designs-msnbccom-left-behind/#comment-563831</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/12/designs-msnbccom-left-behind/#comment-563831</guid>
		<description>Yea... pretty risky. 

However, I wonder if the person posting these really likes 'design x' better than the current one. 

I like some of the "sample platter" designs better myself. They seem cleaner and less cluttered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea&#8230; pretty risky. </p>
<p>However, I wonder if the person posting these really likes &#8216;design x&#8217; better than the current one. </p>
<p>I like some of the &#8220;sample platter&#8221; designs better myself. They seem cleaner and less cluttered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Day</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/12/designs-msnbccom-left-behind/#comment-563139</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 06:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/12/designs-msnbccom-left-behind/#comment-563139</guid>
		<description>Wow. That is brave... you run the risk of people going "I like design X better."  Which is how I feel right now (but not about the cowbell design).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That is brave&#8230; you run the risk of people going &#8220;I like design X better.&#8221;  Which is how I feel right now (but not about the cowbell design).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
