<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch: WSJ.com expected to be free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: News Consumer</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/#comment-564676</link>
		<dc:creator>News Consumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/#comment-564676</guid>
		<description>Thre's more to the value of the content than merely the subscription or ad dollars that content might generate.  Th WSJ is one of the few media companies that has a public image as a premiere news source.  By giving away that content they may ultimately be devaluing it.  It's a tricky trade-off - give it away so more people will read it and thereby driving up ad revenues, or keep it subscription and maintain the image as a high-value source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thre&#8217;s more to the value of the content than merely the subscription or ad dollars that content might generate.  Th WSJ is one of the few media companies that has a public image as a premiere news source.  By giving away that content they may ultimately be devaluing it.  It&#8217;s a tricky trade-off - give it away so more people will read it and thereby driving up ad revenues, or keep it subscription and maintain the image as a high-value source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike jones</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/#comment-564311</link>
		<dc:creator>mike jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/#comment-564311</guid>
		<description>It's going to take a long time to make up that revenue that he's throwing away. Diversification of revenue is never a bad thing, particularly when the ad market wanes.

He should put most things free, but create a premium product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going to take a long time to make up that revenue that he&#8217;s throwing away. Diversification of revenue is never a bad thing, particularly when the ad market wanes.</p>
<p>He should put most things free, but create a premium product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/#comment-564230</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/#comment-564230</guid>
		<description>There is no doubt that they will make a considerable amount off ads. They provide alot of content that could be available to even more outlets. MAKE IT FREE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt that they will make a considerable amount off ads. They provide alot of content that could be available to even more outlets. MAKE IT FREE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/#comment-564118</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/13/murdoch-wsjcom-expected-to-be-free/#comment-564118</guid>
		<description>If they can get 15 million monthly users as a mostly* free site, that should be good for at least $100m in revenue.

*Even free, there are probably some upsell possibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they can get 15 million monthly users as a mostly* free site, that should be good for at least $100m in revenue.</p>
<p>*Even free, there are probably some upsell possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
