<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News is a process, not a finished product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/15/news-is-a-process-not-a-finished-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/15/news-is-a-process-not-a-finished-product/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brink</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/15/news-is-a-process-not-a-finished-product/#comment-569701</link>
		<dc:creator>Brink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/15/news-is-a-process-not-a-finished-product/#comment-569701</guid>
		<description>Just another example of how we legitimize sloppy coverage of news on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another example of how we legitimize sloppy coverage of news on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/15/news-is-a-process-not-a-finished-product/#comment-569393</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/15/news-is-a-process-not-a-finished-product/#comment-569393</guid>
		<description>The real secret of TMZ is that it was able to combine the deep pockets of its owners with a deniability that makes it almost impossible for news channels and online news operations to ignore.

It's common practice for otherwise careful journalists to use TMZ.com as an easy way to introduce unsourced, salacious celebrity news. Using the phrase "TMZ reports" offers up denialability to every Britney Spears tidbit or Paris Hilton sighting.

Yes, TMZ does get things right. But it often gets them wrong. And even more frequently, it offers up a series of posts that are obviously coming from one side of a celebrity story. 

Okay, I'm going to stop ranting now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real secret of TMZ is that it was able to combine the deep pockets of its owners with a deniability that makes it almost impossible for news channels and online news operations to ignore.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s common practice for otherwise careful journalists to use TMZ.com as an easy way to introduce unsourced, salacious celebrity news. Using the phrase &#8220;TMZ reports&#8221; offers up denialability to every Britney Spears tidbit or Paris Hilton sighting.</p>
<p>Yes, TMZ does get things right. But it often gets them wrong. And even more frequently, it offers up a series of posts that are obviously coming from one side of a celebrity story. </p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m going to stop ranting now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
