<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABCNews.com to update its redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Escutia</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-574456</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Escutia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-574456</guid>
		<description>I like it... &lt;em&gt;except&lt;/em&gt; for the black background on the header and main navigation.  It's too dark and colorless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it&#8230; <em>except</em> for the black background on the header and main navigation.  It&#8217;s too dark and colorless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-572680</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 05:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-572680</guid>
		<description>Looks like the new look is live. It still seems a bit crunched/cluttered, but it's a hell of a lot better than it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the new look is live. It still seems a bit crunched/cluttered, but it&#8217;s a hell of a lot better than it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swift Loris</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-571985</link>
		<dc:creator>Swift Loris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-571985</guid>
		<description>Ditto, adm. I can read a lot faster than I can watch. Give me some basis for deciding whether it's worth spending the additional time on a video, or forget it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto, adm. I can read a lot faster than I can watch. Give me some basis for deciding whether it&#8217;s worth spending the additional time on a video, or forget it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gay</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-571743</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-571743</guid>
		<description>Wow, doesn't that new look have a strong similarity to cnn.com?  Big picture, long headline list, watch video images above a square ad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, doesn&#8217;t that new look have a strong similarity to cnn.com?  Big picture, long headline list, watch video images above a square ad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adm</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-571622</link>
		<dc:creator>adm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/16/abcnewscom-to-update-its-redesign/#comment-571622</guid>
		<description>"More content for you to grab and go with" and "a greater emphasis on video" are in opposition to each other, aren't they? Esp. if they mean streaming video. The quickest way to get information and to "grab" it -- whatever that means -- is to get it via text.

I know this is an unpopular idea these days, but I really prefer the main stories on a news site to be text-based, with the *option* for video. Unfortunately for me, CNN goes in the opposite direction, putting up all those video links when all I really want is a quick textual run-down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;More content for you to grab and go with&#8221; and &#8220;a greater emphasis on video&#8221; are in opposition to each other, aren&#8217;t they? Esp. if they mean streaming video. The quickest way to get information and to &#8220;grab&#8221; it &#8212; whatever that means &#8212; is to get it via text.</p>
<p>I know this is an unpopular idea these days, but I really prefer the main stories on a news site to be text-based, with the *option* for video. Unfortunately for me, CNN goes in the opposite direction, putting up all those video links when all I really want is a quick textual run-down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
