<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter featured on CSI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/19/twitter-featured-on-csi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/19/twitter-featured-on-csi/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fleetwood mack</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/19/twitter-featured-on-csi/#comment-581697</link>
		<dc:creator>fleetwood mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/19/twitter-featured-on-csi/#comment-581697</guid>
		<description>why is it that all the redesigns wind up looking the same. 

boxes and boxes.

quick look at the daily news screen grab you posted and for split nano-seconds it looks so much like the new abcnews design.

creative and darilngly different anyone?  or is that just impossible now.

too much risk in difference and no reward?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is it that all the redesigns wind up looking the same. </p>
<p>boxes and boxes.</p>
<p>quick look at the daily news screen grab you posted and for split nano-seconds it looks so much like the new abcnews design.</p>
<p>creative and darilngly different anyone?  or is that just impossible now.</p>
<p>too much risk in difference and no reward?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
