<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paper publisher: TV news is less than high-quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/26/paper-publisher-decries-tv-news-as-less-than-high-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/26/paper-publisher-decries-tv-news-as-less-than-high-quality/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brink</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/26/paper-publisher-decries-tv-news-as-less-than-high-quality/#comment-595388</link>
		<dc:creator>Brink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/26/paper-publisher-decries-tv-news-as-less-than-high-quality/#comment-595388</guid>
		<description>The saddest part is that his comment was relevant 25 years ago.

This whole new "internet" thingy is what print needs to worry about now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The saddest part is that his comment was relevant 25 years ago.</p>
<p>This whole new &#8220;internet&#8221; thingy is what print needs to worry about now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/26/paper-publisher-decries-tv-news-as-less-than-high-quality/#comment-593543</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/26/paper-publisher-decries-tv-news-as-less-than-high-quality/#comment-593543</guid>
		<description>Gee, there's a surprise, a newspaper that thinks it's better than TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, there&#8217;s a surprise, a newspaper that thinks it&#8217;s better than TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/26/paper-publisher-decries-tv-news-as-less-than-high-quality/#comment-593526</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/26/paper-publisher-decries-tv-news-as-less-than-high-quality/#comment-593526</guid>
		<description>I don't pay for a print paper, so why would I pay for it online? Even in some small backwater in Idaho. As for the TV crack, methinks thou doesth protest too much. If that's true, explain Larry King's old USA TODAY column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t pay for a print paper, so why would I pay for it online? Even in some small backwater in Idaho. As for the TV crack, methinks thou doesth protest too much. If that&#8217;s true, explain Larry King&#8217;s old USA TODAY column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
