<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hearst-Argyle expands Google partnership to sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/28/hearst-argyle-expands-google-partnership-to-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/28/hearst-argyle-expands-google-partnership-to-sales/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rocker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/28/hearst-argyle-expands-google-partnership-to-sales/#comment-601373</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/28/hearst-argyle-expands-google-partnership-to-sales/#comment-601373</guid>
		<description>re; the "$500 problem"...one of the things I think TV stations are going to have to get used to is figuring out how to get $500-$5000/year out of hundreds or thousands of advertisers, as opposed to an average of some number of $hundreds of thousands out of a relative handful of accounts.  I don't really see that as a problem, I see it as an opportunity.  But the old sales model won't work any better than the old production/distribution model.  Sure it was nice to have 8-10 sales people each handling a small list....ah, waxing nostalgic again...  (this is another area where newspapers have a head start, btw).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re; the &#8220;$500 problem&#8221;&#8230;one of the things I think TV stations are going to have to get used to is figuring out how to get $500-$5000/year out of hundreds or thousands of advertisers, as opposed to an average of some number of $hundreds of thousands out of a relative handful of accounts.  I don&#8217;t really see that as a problem, I see it as an opportunity.  But the old sales model won&#8217;t work any better than the old production/distribution model.  Sure it was nice to have 8-10 sales people each handling a small list&#8230;.ah, waxing nostalgic again&#8230;  (this is another area where newspapers have a head start, btw).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/28/hearst-argyle-expands-google-partnership-to-sales/#comment-599547</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/28/hearst-argyle-expands-google-partnership-to-sales/#comment-599547</guid>
		<description>btw- 

terry mackin continues to impress me; "all three screens".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw- </p>
<p>terry mackin continues to impress me; &#8220;all three screens&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/28/hearst-argyle-expands-google-partnership-to-sales/#comment-599540</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/28/hearst-argyle-expands-google-partnership-to-sales/#comment-599540</guid>
		<description>i read this release yesterday and it managed to take htv shares off two consecutive days of 52 week lows.

i have to ask though, with friends that use google adwords with great success spending less than $500 per month, what can a salesperson (and thereby the company) ever stand to make off this exercise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read this release yesterday and it managed to take htv shares off two consecutive days of 52 week lows.</p>
<p>i have to ask though, with friends that use google adwords with great success spending less than $500 per month, what can a salesperson (and thereby the company) ever stand to make off this exercise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
