<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Networks to hit $120M in web video ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/29/report-networks-to-hit-120m-in-web-video-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/29/report-networks-to-hit-120m-in-web-video-ads/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/29/report-networks-to-hit-120m-in-web-video-ads/#comment-603412</link>
		<dc:creator>James Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/29/report-networks-to-hit-120m-in-web-video-ads/#comment-603412</guid>
		<description>It would interest me to see the facts behind this claim.  Are advertisers just shooting in the dark or is this real?
Jim Simpson
jsimpson@imediate.tv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would interest me to see the facts behind this claim.  Are advertisers just shooting in the dark or is this real?<br />
Jim Simpson<br />
<a href="mailto:jsimpson@imediate.tv">jsimpson@imediate.tv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/29/report-networks-to-hit-120m-in-web-video-ads/#comment-601366</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/29/report-networks-to-hit-120m-in-web-video-ads/#comment-601366</guid>
		<description>Granted, the information is sketchy and proprietary, but I haven't heard anything bandied about to suggest that the volume of video impressions on the network sites this year would have allowed for a number like $120 m.  Seems very high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, the information is sketchy and proprietary, but I haven&#8217;t heard anything bandied about to suggest that the volume of video impressions on the network sites this year would have allowed for a number like $120 m.  Seems very high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
