<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook pulls back on Beacon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/30/facebook-pulls-back-on-beacon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/30/facebook-pulls-back-on-beacon/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mmmm....</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/30/facebook-pulls-back-on-beacon/#comment-601467</link>
		<dc:creator>mmmm....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/30/facebook-pulls-back-on-beacon/#comment-601467</guid>
		<description>bacon....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bacon&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/30/facebook-pulls-back-on-beacon/#comment-601362</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/30/facebook-pulls-back-on-beacon/#comment-601362</guid>
		<description>re; Beacon...why don't they just do it in the form of "one of your friends recently bought", instead of specifying exactly who.  I think that would be a lot less objectionable.  If they proceed as advertised, and change to opt-in instead of opt-out, the program is over (because no one will knowingly opt-in to that).  More likely, the change will be more legalistic...but most people "particpating" will still be doing so unaware.  That is an ultimately fruitless...and possibly very damaging...path for Facebook to pursue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re; Beacon&#8230;why don&#8217;t they just do it in the form of &#8220;one of your friends recently bought&#8221;, instead of specifying exactly who.  I think that would be a lot less objectionable.  If they proceed as advertised, and change to opt-in instead of opt-out, the program is over (because no one will knowingly opt-in to that).  More likely, the change will be more legalistic&#8230;but most people &#8220;particpating&#8221; will still be doing so unaware.  That is an ultimately fruitless&#8230;and possibly very damaging&#8230;path for Facebook to pursue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/30/facebook-pulls-back-on-beacon/#comment-601254</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/11/30/facebook-pulls-back-on-beacon/#comment-601254</guid>
		<description>Just another note that none of your top menu items work. I'd "drop you a line," but that link doesn't work, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another note that none of your top menu items work. I&#8217;d &#8220;drop you a line,&#8221; but that link doesn&#8217;t work, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
