<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC votes to loosen ownership rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-631292</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-631292</guid>
		<description>Is the FCC still refusing to allow low power community TV and radio licenses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the FCC still refusing to allow low power community TV and radio licenses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-629303</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-629303</guid>
		<description>Does anyone believe elimination of radio station
ownership rules in 1996 made for better radio? 
Looks to me like commercial radio is pretty much
down for the count. Why?, because programming
risk was removed from the equation. Same voices
and opinions were/are everywhere. 

So what will happen?  I think this will drive people even
faster to alternative ways to get news and entertainment,
just like what happened with radio and music.
So, this is good for new news outlets and bad for
old media, although I'm sure the suits who lobbied
for this change don't see it that way. But they also
don't see what's happening in the real world and
don't have a clue how to compete.

Agree, disagree?
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone believe elimination of radio station<br />
ownership rules in 1996 made for better radio?<br />
Looks to me like commercial radio is pretty much<br />
down for the count. Why?, because programming<br />
risk was removed from the equation. Same voices<br />
and opinions were/are everywhere. </p>
<p>So what will happen?  I think this will drive people even<br />
faster to alternative ways to get news and entertainment,<br />
just like what happened with radio and music.<br />
So, this is good for new news outlets and bad for<br />
old media, although I&#8217;m sure the suits who lobbied<br />
for this change don&#8217;t see it that way. But they also<br />
don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s happening in the real world and<br />
don&#8217;t have a clue how to compete.</p>
<p>Agree, disagree?<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mullah cimoc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-629174</link>
		<dc:creator>mullah cimoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-629174</guid>
		<description>mullah cimoc say aemeriki not having him free press.  for save ameriki nation  usa people must to make new federal communication law:

1.  each tv station and each the radio station must be own 100% by person live within physical area serve by tv station.  this call the local ownership.

2.  no single person to owning more than 1% of any one tv station stock certificate.  this make the diverse ownership.

3.  abolish him networks, abccbsnbcfox.  then to letting local own station form own networks with power from bottom up (flow from shareholder to board of director to ceo), not him top down like now in usa.

4.  this keep the free press and stop the rupert murdoch type man keep all ameriki so stupid if buy him corporation which to own so many station and newspaper and radio and keep ameriki the stupid people.

after follow mullah cimoc method benjamin frankling to be the proud.

for true info:  stop1984now@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mullah cimoc say aemeriki not having him free press.  for save ameriki nation  usa people must to make new federal communication law:</p>
<p>1.  each tv station and each the radio station must be own 100% by person live within physical area serve by tv station.  this call the local ownership.</p>
<p>2.  no single person to owning more than 1% of any one tv station stock certificate.  this make the diverse ownership.</p>
<p>3.  abolish him networks, abccbsnbcfox.  then to letting local own station form own networks with power from bottom up (flow from shareholder to board of director to ceo), not him top down like now in usa.</p>
<p>4.  this keep the free press and stop the rupert murdoch type man keep all ameriki so stupid if buy him corporation which to own so many station and newspaper and radio and keep ameriki the stupid people.</p>
<p>after follow mullah cimoc method benjamin frankling to be the proud.</p>
<p>for true info:  <a href="mailto:stop1984now@yahoo.com">stop1984now@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E. Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-629022</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E. Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-629022</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and I saw in the NY Times article that a bunch of waivers were made permanent. Does that include LA Times/KTLA, AZ Republic/KPNX, all the Tribune waivers, NY Post/WNYW-WWOR? And now that it's done, whither Congress? Are they mad enough to pass a bill forcing unconsolidation and divestiture of the waivers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and I saw in the NY Times article that a bunch of waivers were made permanent. Does that include LA Times/KTLA, AZ Republic/KPNX, all the Tribune waivers, NY Post/WNYW-WWOR? And now that it&#8217;s done, whither Congress? Are they mad enough to pass a bill forcing unconsolidation and divestiture of the waivers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-628988</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2007/12/18/fcc-votes-to-loosen-ownership-rules/#comment-628988</guid>
		<description>So what happens with Tribune in markets like Ct (ranked #30?)for example where they have two stations and a Newspaper? Will they need to sell off one or two properties?

Scott B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what happens with Tribune in markets like Ct (ranked #30?)for example where they have two stations and a Newspaper? Will they need to sell off one or two properties?</p>
<p>Scott B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
